1
284
SALOMATINA et al.
The barriers to conformational transitions were cal-
(2aR,4aR,5S,7aR,7bS)-5-Hydroxy-2,2,4a-tri-
methyldecahydrocyclobuta[e]indene-7a-carbalde-
culated by the PM3 method; the heats of formation of
carbocations and the barriers to rearrangements were
calculated by the AM1 method. The B3LYP/6-31G*
calculations were performed using GAMESS program
2
0
1
hyde (Va). [α] = –10.0° (c = 2.1, CHCl ). H NMR
5
80
3
1
5
spectrum, δ, ppm (J, Hz): 1.05 s (C H ), 1.10 s
(C H ), 1.14 s (C H ), 1.21 d.d (10-H, J = 11,
3
1
2
14
3
3
10,9
[
7] at the Information Technologies Department,
J10,10' = 10), 1.28–1.50 m (4H, 2-H, 3-H), 1.52 m
(1-H), 1.54 d.d (10'-H, J = 10, J10',9 = 7), 1.66 m (6-H),
Novosibirsk State University.
1
.72–1.87 m (7-H), 2.13 m (6'-H, J6',6 = 13, J6',5 = 8),
Caryophyllene isolated from clove oil was used,
α] = –13.8° (c = 4.3, CHCl3).
580
20
2.30 d.d.d (9-H, J9,1 = 12, J9,10 = 11, J = 7), 3.73 d.d
9,10'
[
1
3
(5-H, J5,6 = 9, J5,6' = 8), 9.51 s (13-H). C NMR spec-
Isomerization of caryophyllene into isocaryo-
phyllene [8]. A mixture of 20 g of caryophyllene and
.2 g of finely powdered selenium was heated for 5 h
1
2
3
trum, δ , ppm: 46.71 d (C ), 23.00 t (C ), 30.93 t (C ),
C
4
5
6
7
4
6
1
8.53 s (C ), 80.39 d (C ), 29.90 t (C ), 19.41 t (C ),
0.04 s (C ), 35.49 d (C ), 37.55 t (C ), 39.63 s (C ),
9.70 q (C ), 205.87 d (C ), 20.83 q (C ), 30.37 q
0
8
9
10
11
at 180–190°C under argon. The crude product, 19 g,
was subjected to column chromatography on silica gel
using hexane as eluent to isolate 16 g (80%) of iso-
12
13
14
15
+
(
C ). Found: m/z 236.11748 [M] . C H O . Calcu-
15 24 2
lated: M 236.11762.
2
5
0
caryophyllene (I), [α] = –15.0° (c = 5.4, CHCl3).
80
We failed to distinguish signals from some protons
Isocaryophyllene diepoxide (III) was synthesized
according to the procedure described in [2]. Treatment
of 6.70 g (0.032 mol) of isocaryophyllene (I) with
a solution of monoperoxyphthalic acid (0.0385 mol) in
diethyl ether (c = 0.0007 M), followed by recrys-
tallization from hexane, gave 2.50 g (35%) of 4β,5β-
monoepoxide II. Epoxidation of the latter afforded
1
for each compound in the H NMR spectrum of mix-
ture VI/VII due to their superposition.
{
(1R,4R,6S,9S,10R)-4,12,12-Trimethyl-5-oxa-
4
,6
tricyclo[8.2.0.0 ]dodec-9-yl}acetaldehyde (VI).
1
15
H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm (J, Hz): 0.94 s (C H ),
3
1
4
12
0
.97 s (C H ), 1.29 s (C H ), 1.22–1.35 m (2-H, 3-H),
3 3
2
0
1.34 d.d (10-H, J10,10' = 10, J10,9 = 10), 1.55 d.d (10'-H,
J = 10, J10',9 = 8), 2.48 m (9-H), 2.58 d.d.d (8-H, J8,9
11, J8,7 = 6, J8,7' = 3), 2.63 d.d (5-H, J5,6 = 12, J = 3),
2
1
(
1
1
.57 g (95.5%) of compound III, [α] = –21.1° (c =
580
1
=
.9, CHCl ). H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm (J, Hz): 0.88 s
3
14
15
12
5,6'
C H ), 0.91 s (C H ), 1.26 s (C H ), 1.78 m (1β-H),
3 3 3
13
9
.54 s (13-H), 1.48–2.15 m (other protons). C NMR
.28–1.38 m (3-H, 2-H), 1.42–1.62 m (7-H, 2'-H, 6-H),
.88–2.03 m (7'-H, 3'-H, 9-H, 6'-H), 1.32 d.d (10-H,
1
2
spectrum, δ , ppm: 49.67 d (C ), 25.97 t (C ), 34.53 t
C
3
4
5
6
(
(
(
C ), 61.17 s (C ), 63.79 d (C ), 23.53 t (C ), 18.81 t
C ), 49.25 d (C ), 37.44 d (C ), 34.91 t (C ), 36.13 s
C ), 22.09 q (C ), 202.30 d (C ), 21.01 q (C ),
J10,10' = 10, J10,9 = 10), 1.48 d.d (10'-H, J = 10, J10',9
=
7
8
9
10
8
), 2.41 d (13-H, J13,13' = 5), 2.54 d.d (13'-H, J = 5, 1),
.63 d.d.d (5-H, J5, 6 = 11, J5, 6' = 2.5, J = 1).
11
12
13
14
2
5, 3'
1
5
13
1
29.80 q (C ).
C NMR spectrum, δ , ppm: 48.10 d (C ), 25.73 t
C
2
3
4
5
(
(
(
(
C ), 33.45 t (C ), 60.89 s (C ), 64.10 d (C ), 23.55 t
C ), 30.94 t (C ), 58.33 s (C ), 40.78 d (C ), 34.71 t
C ), 33.82 s (C ), 22.30 q (C ), 55.58 t (C ), 22.41 q
C ), 29.58 q (C ). Found: m/z 236.11748 [M] .
{(1R,4R,6S,9S,10R)-4,12,12-Trimethyl-5-oxa-
6
7
8
9
4,6
tricyclo[8.2.0.0 ]dodec-9-yl}acetic acid (VII).
10
11
12
13
1
15
H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm (J, Hz): 0.92 s (C H ),
3
1
4
15
+
14
12
0.93 s (C H ), 1.31 s (C H ), 2.42 m (9-H), 2.67 d.d
3 3
C H O . Calculated: M 236.11762.
(5-H, J5,6 = 12, J5,6' = 3), 3.73 d.d.d (8-H, J8,9 = 11,
15
24
2
J
= 6, J8,7' = 4), 1.22–2.08 m (other protons).
8
,7
Isomerization of isocaryophyllene diepoxide (III)
over β-zeolite. A solution of 0.40 g of compound III in
0 ml of methylene chloride was added to 0.70 g of
freshly calcined β-zeolite. The mixture was stirred for
0 min and filtered. According to the GLC data, the
mixture contained compounds IV, Va, and VI at a ratio
of 3:2:1. The product mixture, 0.39 g, was subjected
to column chromatography on silica gel (gradient
elution with hexane–diethyl ether, 0 to 80% of the
latter) to isolate 0.07 g (18%) of compound IV, 0.12 g
1
3
1
C NMR spectrum, δ , ppm: 48.75 d (C ), 25.90 t
C
2
3
4
5
(
C ), 34.60 t (C ), 61.26 s (C ), 63.67 d (C ), 23.64 t
1
6
7
8
9
(
C ), 20.88 t (C ), 41.64 d (C ), 39.27 d (C ), 34.87 t
1
0
11
12
13
(
C ), 36.13 s (C ), 22.09 q (C ), 179.55 s (C ),
5
1
4
15
2
0.98 q (C ), 29.80 q (C ).
Transformations of isocaryophyllene diepoxide
(III) under homogeneous conditions. a. In the system
acetone–water–sulfuric acid. Compound III, 0.20 g,
was dissolved in 3 ml of a mixture of acetone, water,
and sulfuric acid at a ratio of 50:6:1 (by volume).
After 2 h, the mixture was treated with a saturated
aqueous solution of Na CO and extracted with diethyl
(
31%) of Va, and 0.04 g of mixture VI/VII (1:0.4).
The spectral parameters of compound IV were re-
ported in [1].
2
3
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 41 No. 9 2005