New Copper Complex on Fe3O4 Nanoparticles as a Highly Efcient Reusable Nanocatalyst…
was separated by magnetic decantation, washed with eth-
anol and, then, dried at 90 °C in an oven for 4 h. After-
wards, the Schif-Base ligand supported on heterogeneous
Fe3O4 was obtained by the reaction of O-bisMe-furaldehyde
(5,5′-Oxybis(5-methylene-2-furaldehyde)) (2.5 mmol) with
the amine groups on the surface of Fe3O4@APTMS (1 g) in
ethanol (20 mL) overnight and under nitrogen atmosphere
and refux conditions. The target Fe3O4@Schif-base was
obtained by magnetic separation, washed with ethanol, and
dried at 80 °C in an oven for 4 h. Finally, In order to pre-
pare Fe3O4@Schif-Base-Cu organometallic complex, the
obtained Fe3O4@Schif-base (0.1 g) was dispersed in 30 mL
ethanol by sonication for 30 min and, then, Cu(NO3)2·3H2O
(0.5 g) was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction mix-
ture was stirred at 80 °C for 24 h. Then, the fnal product
(Fe3O4@Schif-Base-Cu) was separated using an external
magnet, washed with water and ethanol and dried at 80 °C
in an oven for 4 h.
J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.67 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.43 (d, J=16.8 Hz, 1H),
2.29 (m, 4H), 2.17 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 1.98 (d, J=16.0 Hz,
1H), 1.15 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (s, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H). 13
C
NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ=194.2, 166.9, 157.3, 149.2,
144.6, 140.0, 128.4, 113.1, 110.1, 103.9, 59.0, 54.8, 50.3, 34.9,
32.1, 29.1, 26.5, 18.2, 14.2.
2.3.3 Ethyl 4‑(3,4‑dimethoxyphenyl)‑2,7,7‑trimethyl‑5‑
oxo‑1,4,5,6,7,8‑hexahydroquinoline‑3‑carboxylate
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 9.02 (s, 1H, NH),
6.77–6.74 (m, 2H), 6.63 (dd, J=2.0 & 8.4 Hz 1H), 4.79 (s,
1H), 4.02 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.66 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.65 (s,
3H, OCH3), 2.44 (d, J=17.2 Hz, 1H), 2.30–2.26 (m, 4H),
2.19 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H), 2.00 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H), 1.17
(t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.01 (s, 3H), 0.88 (s, 3H). 13C NMR
(50 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ=194.2, 166.8, 149.3, 147.9, 146.9,
144.5, 140.4, 119.2, 111.7, 111.4, 110.0, 103.8, 59.0, 55.4,
55.3, 50.3, 35.1, 32.1, 29.2, 26.4, 18.2, 14.2.
2.2 General Procedure for the Synthesis of Polyhyd‑
roquinolines
2.3.4 Ethyl 2,7,7‑trimethyl‑5‑oxo‑4‑(4‑(trifuoromethyl)
phenyl)‑1,4,5,6,7,8‑hexahydroquinoline‑3‑carboxy‑
A mixture of aldehyde (1 mmol), dimedon (1 mmol), ethy-
lacetoacetate (1 mmol) and ammonium acetate (1.3 mmol)
was dissolved in 3 mL water in the presence of Fe3O4@
Schif-Base-Cu catalyst (0.25 mol% of Cu) and stirred at
refux conditions. The progress of the reaction was mon-
itored by TLC. After the completion of the reaction, the
catalyst was separated by a magnet and washed with etha-
nol. Then, the solvent was evaporated and, fnally, all the
products were recrystallized in ethanol.
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ=9.17 (s, 1H, NH), 7.57
(d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (d, J= 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.93 (s, 1H),
3.99 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.45 (d, J=16.4 Hz, 1H), 2.32 (m,
4H), 2.19 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H), 2.00 (d, J= 16.0 Hz, 1H),
1.13 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (s, 3H), 0.83 (s, 3H). 13C NMR
(50 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ=194.1, 166.6, 151.8, 149.8, 145.7,
128.2, 124.7, 124.6, 109.3, 102.8, 59.1, 50.1, 36.3, 32.1,
29.0, 26.5, 18.3, 14.1.
2.3 Selected Spectral Data
2.3.1 Ethyl 4‑(4‑chlorophenyl)‑2,7,7‑trimethyl‑5‑oxo‑1,4,5
,6,7,8‑hexahydroquinoline‑3‑carboxylate (Table 2
Entry 1)
2.3.5 Ethyl 4‑(4‑cyanophenyl)‑2,7,7‑trimethyl‑5‑oxo‑1,4,
5,6,7,8‑hexahydroquinoline‑3‑carboxylate (Table 2
Entry 6)
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ=9.12 (s, 1H, NH) 7.25
(d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.16 (d, J= 8.4 Hz, 2H), 4.83 (s, 1H),
3.99 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.43 (d, J=17.2 Hz, 1H), 2.25–2.28
(m, 4H), 2.19 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 1.99 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H),
1.13 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (s, 3H), 0.83 (s, 3H). 13C NMR
(50 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ=194.1, 166.5, 149.5, 146.5, 145.3,
130.2, 129.2, 127.6, 109.6, 103.0, 59.0, 50.1, 35.6, 32.1,
29.0, 26.4, 18.3, 4.1.
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ=9.19 (s, 1H, NH), 7.68
(d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, J= 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.90 (s, 1H),
3.98 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.44 (d, J=17.2 Hz, 1H), 2.30–2.26
(m, 4H), 2.19 (d, J=16.4 Hz, 1H), 1.99 (d, J=16.4 Hz, 1H),
1.12 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (s, 3H), 0.81 (s, 3H).13C NMR
(50 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ=194.1, 166.3, 152.8, 149.9, 146.0,
131.8, 128.5, 119.0, 109.1, 108.5, 102.4, 59.1, 50.1, 36.7,
32.1, 29.0, 26.4, 18.3, 14.1.
2.3.2 Ethyl 4‑(4‑methoxyphenyl)‑2,7,7‑trimethyl‑5‑oxo‑1,4,
5,6,7,8‑hexahydroquinoline‑3‑carboxylate (Table 2
Entry 3)
2.3.6 Ethyl 4‑(3,4‑dihydroxyphenyl)‑2,7,7‑trimethyl‑5‑oxo‑
1,4,5,6,7,8‑hexahydroquinoline‑3‑carboxylate
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ=9.00 (s, 1H, NH), 7.05 (d,
J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.74 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 4.78 (s, 1H), 3.99 (q,
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ=8.94 (s, 1H, NH), 8.56
(s, 1H, OH), 8.45 (s, 1H, OH), 6.57 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.51
1 3