Table 2 Enantioselective catalytic phase-transfer alkylation
This work was supported by grants from Aminogen Co.,
Korea, via the Research Center of New Drug Development of
Seoul National University and the Research Institute of
Pharmaceutical Sciences in the College of Pharmacy of Seoul
National University.
% eeb
Config.c
Entry
RX
Time/h
% Yielda
Notes and references
a
b
c
CH3I
CH3CH2I
CH3(CH2)4CH2I
3
10
5
72
50
64
90 (S)
92 (S)
99 (S)
‡ All new compounds gave satisfactory analytical and spectral data.
Selected data for 4: mp 181 °C (decomp.); [a]25D 2156 (c 0.320, CHCl3);
IR (KBr) 3437, 2922 cm21; dH (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 9.03 (d, J = 4.4 Hz,
2 H), 8.35 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 8.15 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 3 H), 7.97 (d, J = 7.5
Hz, 2 H), 7.90–7.86 (m, 2 H), 7.81–7.76 (m, 3 H), 7.72 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 2 H),
6.53 (s, 2 H), 6.22–6.16 (m, 2 H), 5.78–5.70 (m, 2 H), 5.49 (d, J = 17.2 Hz,
2 H), 5.37–5.28 (m, 4 H), 5.20–5.14 (m, 4 H), 4.99 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 2 H),
4.46 (dd, J = 12.5, 5.3 Hz, 2 H), 4.06–4.03 (m, 6 H), 3.82–3.76 (m, 2 H),
3.69–3.64 (m, 2 H), 3.51–3.40 (m, 2 H), 2.84–2.75 (m, 2 H), 2.34–2.26 (m,
2 H), 2.15–2.00 (m, 4 H), 1.92–1.81 (m, 2 H), 1.51–1.42 (m, 2 H); dC (100
MHz, DMSO-d6) 150.6, 148.4, 141.7, 139.3, 138.3, 135.9, 134.6, 130.3,
130.0, 129.9, 128.8, 127.9, 125.4, 124.1, 120.0, 118.0, 116.9, 72.3, 69.7,
68.2, 63.4, 59.3, 51.2, 37.2, 26.3, 24.5, 21.2; MS (ESI): 772 [M]2+; HRMS
(ESI) calcd for [C52H60N4O2]2+: 772.4716, found: 772.4739.
d
e
4
4
86
88
94 (S)
97 (S)
f
3
5
92
94
90 (S)
95 (S)
g
h
i
5
8
87
75
95 (S)
96 (S)
Representative procedure for enantioselective catalytic alkylation of 6
under phase-transfer conditions (benzylation): to a mixture of N-(diphenyl-
methylene)glycine tert-butyl ester 6 (50 mg, 0.17 mmol) and chiral catalyst
4 (8 mg, 0.0085 mmol) in toluene–CHCl3 (v/v = 7+3, 0.75 mL) was added
benzyl bromide (0.1 mL, 0.85 mmol). The reaction mixture was then cooled
(220 °C), 50% aq. KOH (0.25 mL) was added, and the reaction mixture was
stirred at 220 °C until the starting material had been consumed (5 h). The
suspension was diluted with ether (20 mL), washed with water (2 3 5 mL),
dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the
residue by flash column chromatography on silica gel (hexane+EtOAc =
50+1) afforded the desired product 7g (61 mg, 94% yield) as a colorless oil.
The enantioselectivity was determined by chiral HPLC analysis (DAICEL
j
6
8
5
98
90
96
95 (S)
90 (S)
90 (S)
k
l
a Isolated yield of purified material. b Enantiopurity was determined by
HPLC analysis of the alkylated imine 7 using a chiral column (DAICEL
Chiralcel OD) with hexane–propan-2-ol (500/2 for 7a, 7b, 7g, 7h, 7j, 7k, 7l;
500/1 for 7c, 7d, 7e, 7f; 500/5 for 7i) as solvent. c Absolute configuration
was determined by comparison of the HPLC retention time with the
authentic samples independently synthesized by the reported proce-
dure.4–7
Chiralcel OD, hexane+propan-2-ol = 500+2.5, flow rate = 1.0 ml min21
,
23 °C, l = 254 nm; retention times R (minor) 12.2 min, S (major) 22.5 min,
95% ee). The absolute configuration was determined by comparison of the
HPLC retention time with the authentic sample synthesized by the reported
procedure.4–7
1 (a) E. V. Dehmlow and S. S. Dehmlow, Phase Transfer Catalysis, 3rd
edn., VCH, Weinheim, 1993 and references therein; (b) A. Nelson,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 1583.
2 I. Ojima, Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, 2nd edn., Wiley-VCH, New
York, 2000 and references therein.
enantioselectivity from 1b to 4 implies that the Cinchona unit
(CD+) is located near the B site. Consequently, as the direction
B is sterically hindered by the counter Cinchona unit in 4, the E-
enolate of 6 forms an ion-pair with 4 from the less hindered
direction A. We expect that as the re-face of the enolate can be
effectively blocked by the formation of the ion-pair, the alkyl
halide can approach only the si-face of E-enolate, to give the S-
form. The lack of a difference in the enantioselectivity between
the para-dimer 5 and the monomer 1b implies that the Cinchona
units of the para-dimer 5 do not sterically affect each other. In
the case of the ortho-dimer 3, the severe steric repulsion
between the two Cinchona units may lead to a less efficient
conformation for enantioselectivity. Generally, the lower tem-
perature (220 °C) yielded higher enantioselectivity (Table 1).
Catalyst 4 was chosen for the further investigation of the
enantioselective phase-transfer alkylation with various alkyl
halides. Table 2 indicates the results obtained for the alkylation
of 6 with various alkyl halides, using catalyst 4 under the same
reaction conditions as in Table 1, except for the temperature
(220 °C). The very high enantioselectivities (90–99% ee)
shown in Table 2 indicate that catalyst 4 is a very efficient
enantioselective phase-transfer catalyst for the synthesis of
natural and unnatural a-amino acids.
3 H. C. Kolb, M. S. VanNieuwenhze and K. B. Sharpless, Chem. Rev.,
1994, 94, 2483 and references therein.
4 (a) M. J. O’Donnell, W. D. Benett and S. Wu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989,
111, 2353; (b) K. B. Lipkowitz, M. W. Cavanaugh, B. Baker and M. J.
O’Donnell, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 5181; (c) M. J. O’Donnell and S.
Wu, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1992, 3, 591; (d) M. J. O’Donnell, S. Wu
and J. C. Huffman, Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 4507; (e) M. J. O’Donnell, S.
Wu, I. Esikova and A. Mi, U.S. Patent 5 554 753, September 10, 1996;
(f) M. J. O’Donnell, I. A. Esikova, A. Mi, D. F. Shullenberger and S. Wu,
in Phase-Transfer Catalysis, ed. M. E. Halpern, ACS Symposium Series
659, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1997, ch. 10; (g)
M. J. O’Donnell, F. Delgado and R. Pottorf, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55,
6347.
5 (a) B. Lygo and P. G. Wainwright, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 8595; (b)
B. Lygo, J. Crosby and J. A. Peterson, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 1385;
(c) B. Lygo, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 1389; (d) B. Lygo, J. Crosby
and J. A. Peterson, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 8671; (e) B. Lygo, J.
Crosby, T. R. Lowdon and P. G. Wainwright, Tetrahedron, 2001, 57,
2391; (f) B. Lygo, J. Crosby, T. R. Lowdon, J. A. Peterson and P. G.
Wainwright, Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 2403.
6 (a) E. J. Corey, F. Xu and M. C. Noe, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119,
12414; (b) E. J. Corey, M. C. Noe and F. Xu, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39,
5347; (c) E. J. Corey, Y. Bo and J. Busch-Peterson, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1998, 120, 13000.
7 (a) T. Ooi, M. Kameda and K. Maruoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121,
6519; (b) T. Ooi, M. Takeuchi, M. Kameda and K. Maruoka, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 5228.
8 N. Baba, J. Oda and M. Kawaguchi, Agric. Biol. Chem., 1986, 50,
3113.
9 The optimal solvent condition was determined by benzylation of 6 at
220 °C using 4. Toluene–CHCl3 (v/v, 7+3) gave the highest enantiose-
lectivity (95% ee) compared to toluene (87% ee), CH2Cl2 (85% ee),
CHCl3 (90% ee), and toluene–CH2Cl2 (v/v, 7+3, 93% ee).
In conclusion, we prepared the dimeric Cinchona alkaloid
ammonium salt catalysts 3–5 to enhance catalytic efficiency by
the dimerization effect. Among the dimeric catalysts, the meta-
isomer (4) showed the highest catalytic activity (90–99% ee) in
the alkylation of 6. The high catalytic efficiency, the easy
preparation, and the lower preparation cost relative to 2a,b
could make 4 a practical catalyst in industrial synthetic
processes for natural and unnatural chiral a-amino acids.
Applications to other various types of phase-transfer catalytic
reactions using 4 are currently being investigated.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 1244–1245
1245