X. Li et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 7351–7356
7355
Table 1 (continued)
Compd
R1R2N–
NS3/4A
1a IC50
(nM)a
Replicon
gt1b transient replicon, EC50 (nM)c,d
EC50 (nM)b
1a
1b
wt
A156S
A156T
A156V
D168A
D168V
R155K
Telaprevir
TMC-435350
Danoprevir
500
10
0.7
540
2
2
372
1
1.5
34
1
0.2
883
0.3
2
1136
86
10
1965
344
8
638
149
39
207
140
26
1778
56
82
a
b
c
FRET assay with HCV NS3 1a protease domain, as described in Ref. 19.
Replicon assay performed as described in Ref. 20.
gt1b transient replicon assay performed as described in Ref. 12.
nd: not determined.
d
cyanoguanidine 25 showed slightly reduced activity in the enzyme
assay and replicon essay, compared to urea 12 or 13.
amide, cyclic carbamide and amide, pyruvic amide, oxamate, oxala-
mide and cyanoguanidine. According to our SAR investigation, most
of these compounds were remarkably potent and exhibited single-
digit to sub-nanomolar activity in the enzymatic assay and cell-
based replicon assay. Variation of P4-substitution does not seem
to significantly impact the antiviral activity (except for cyclic carba-
mate and amide). This suggests that the NS3/4A enzyme tolerates
many P4 substituents, which therefore can be further used to mod-
ulate drug properties. Furthermore, these potent inhibitors with
different P4 capping groups were found to show different potency
profiles against a panel of HCV PI-resistant mutants. In particular,
ureas 12 and 13 were quite potent on all the PI-resistant mutants
in Table 1, and as such this motif was additionally explored leading
to compounds with exciting anti-HCV activity profile.12
The PI-resistant mutant transient replicon assay provides
important information on mutation sensitivity to the inhibitor,
and inhibitory activity against mutants may offer additional
advantage for sufficient coverage of all relevant NS3 PI-resistant
mutants. Although many compounds with different P4 capping
groups were equipotent in the cell-based assay, they exhibited
quite different potency profile against a panel of HCV PI-resistant
mutants. As shown in Table 1, carbamate 10 and ureas 12–13
exhibited much better potency profile compared to amine 11.
a-Methoxy amide 15 or 16 was equipotent in the stable replicon
assay compared to urea, but they were less active against the panel
of PI-resistant mutants (especially A156T, A156V, R155K). Again,
cyclic carbamate 17 or amide 18 was much less potent against
the panel of PI-resistant mutants, compared to their linear counter-
parts. Cyanoguanidine 25 was much less active against PI-resistant
mutants than urea 12 or 13. On the other hand, oxalamide 24
showed comparable potency profile against the panel of PI-
resistant mutants, which warrants further optimization.
Selected compounds were evaluated in the in vivo rat PK model.
Representative PK data for compounds 10, 13 and 15 are shown in
Table 2. In general, these inhibitors showed high plasma clearance
and low oral exposure in rats. Carbamate 10 showed a 3-fold lower
clearance and thus 3-fold higher rat exposure, compared to urea
13. Urea 13 and methoxy carboxamide 15 exhibited similar plasma
clearance and exposure. These results provide a basis for further
optimization of these potent inhibitors to achieve desirable physi-
cochemical properties and favorable liver concentration following
oral administration.
References and notes
1. (a) De Francesco, R.; Migliaccio, G. Nature 2005, 436, 953; (b) Brown, R. S.
Nature 2005, 436, 973; (c) Alter, M. J. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 13, 2436.
2. Njoroge, F. G.; Chen, K. X.; Shih, N. Y.; Piwinski, J. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 50.
3. Lin, C.; Kwong, A. D.; Perni, R. B. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets 2006, 6, 3.
4. Pearlman, B. L. Am. J. Med. 2004, 117, 344.
5. Rong, L.; Dahari, H.; Ribeiro, R. M.; Perelson, A. S. Sci. Transl. Med. 2010, 2, 30–
32.
6. Seiwert, S. D.; Andrews, S. W.; Jiang, Y.; Serebryany, V.; Tan, H.; Kossen, K.;
Rajagopalan, P. T.; Misialek, S.; Stevens, S. K.; Stoycheva, A.; Hong, J.; Lim, S. R.;
Qin, X.; Rieger, R.; Condroski, K. R.; Zhang, H.; Do, M. G.; Lemieux, C.; Hingorani,
G. P.; Hartley, D. P.; Josey, J. A.; Pan, L.; Beigelman, L.; Blatt, L. M. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 4432.
7. Raboisson, P.; de Kock, H.; Rosenquist, A.; Nilsson, M.; Salvador-Oden, L.; Lin, T.
I.; Roue, N.; Ivanov, V.; Wähling, H.; Wickström, K.; Hamelink, E.; Edlund, M.;
Vrang, L.; Vendeville, S.; Van de Vreken, W.; McGowan, D.; Tahri, A.; Hu, L.;
Boutton, C.; Lenz, O.; Delouvroy, F.; Pille, G.; Surleraux, D.; Wigerinck, P.;
Samuelsson, B.; Simmen, K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 4853.
8. McCauley, J. A.; McIntyre, C. J.; Rudd, M. T.; Nguyen, K. T.; Romano, J. J.; Butcher,
J. W.; Gilbert, K. F.; Bush, K. J.; Holloway, M. K.; Swestock, J.; Wan, B. L.; Carroll,
S. S.; Dimuzio, J. M.; Graham, D. J.; Ludmerer, S. W.; Mao, S. S.; Stahlhut, M. W.;
Fandozzi, C. M.; Trainor, N.; Olsen, D. B.; Vacca, J. P.; Liverton, N. J. J. Med. Chem.
2010, 53, 2443.
In summary, we described the synthesis and antiviral activity of
a novel series of HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitors with various P4
capping groups, which include urea, carbamate, methoxy-carbox-
9. Bordeleau, J.; Bos, M.; Bousquet, Y.; Cordingley, M. G.; Duan, J.; Forgione, P.;
Garneau, M.; Ghiro, E.; Gorys, V.; Goulet, S.; Halmos, T.; Kawai, S. H.; Naud, J.;
Poupart, M.-A.; White, P. W. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 6466.
10. Pasquinelli, C.; McPhee, F.; Eley, T.; Villegas, C.; Sandy, K.; Sheridan, P.; Persson,
A.; Huang, S.-P.; Hernandez, D.; Sheaffer, A. K.; Scola, P.; Marbury, T.; Lawitz, E.;
Goldwater, R.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.; DeMicco, M.; Wright, D.; Charlton, M.;
Kraft, W. K.; Lopez-Talavera, J.-C.; Grasela, D. M. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
1838, 2012, 56.
Table 2
PK parameters of selected inhibitors in male Sprague–Dawley ratsa
Compounds
10
13
15
11. For a recent review on HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitors, see: (a) Flisiak, R.;
Parfieniuk, A. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2010, 19, 63; (b) Kwong, A. D.; McNair,
L.; Jacobson, I.; George, S. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2008, 8, 522; (c) Chen, K. X.;
Njoroge, F. G. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2009, 10, 821; (d) Reiser, M.; Timm, J.
Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2009, 7, 537.
12. Kazmierski, W. M.; Hamatake, R.; Duan, M.; Wright, L. L.; Smith, G. K.; Jarvest,
R. L.; Ji, J.-J.; Cooper, J. P.; Tallant, M. D.; Crosby, R. M.; Creech, K.; Li, X.; Zhang,
S.; Zhang, Y.-K.; Liu, Y.; Ding, C. Z.; Zhou, Y.; Plattner, J. J.; Baker, S. J.; Bu, W.;
Liu, L. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 3021.
13. Seiwert, S. D.; Beigelman, L.; Buckman, B.; Stoycheva, A. D.; Porter, S. B.;
Bradford, W. Z.; Serebryany, V. US 20090269305.
14. Ding, C. Z.; Zhang, Y.-K.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Plattner, J. J.; Baker, S.
J.; Liu, L.; Duan, M.; Jarvest, R. L.; Ji, J.; Kazmierski, W. M.; Tallant, M. D.; Wright,
L. L.; Smith, G. K.; Crosby, R. M.; Wang, A. A.; Ni, Z.-J.; Zou, W.; Wright, J. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 7317.
CL (mL/h/kg), iv
AUC (h g/mL), iv
AUC0–inf (h g/mL), po
Terminal t1/2 (h)
%Absorptionb
%Fc
2736
0.381
0.201
1.63
14.5
10.0
9093
0.127
0.0487
1.40
19
8635
0.117
0.0491
0.99
16.5
8.2
l
l
7.4
a
Compounds 13 and 15 were dosed orally at a dose of 5 mg/kg (n = 3) and
intravenously at a dose of 1 mg/kg (n = 3), and compound 10 was dosed orally at a
dose of 6.15 mg/kg (n = 3) and intravenously at a dose of 1.23 mg/kg (n = 3).
Calculated from portal vein drug concentrations after oral administration as
compared to that after IV administration.
b
c
Calculated from jugular vein drug concentrations after oral administration as
compared to that after IV administration.