Organic Process Research & Development 1998, 2, 379−381
A Practical Synthesis of Cycloheptane-1,3-dione
John A. Ragan,* Teresa W. Makowski, David J. am Ende, Pamela J. Clifford, Gregory R. Young, Alyson K. Conrad, and
Shane A. Eisenbeis
Process Research and DeVelopment, Pfizer Central Research, Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut 06340
Abstract:
Scheme 1
A three-step synthesis of cycloheptane-1,3-dione has been
developed which avoids the use of heavy metal or explosive
reagents and provides access to multigram quantities of this
material.
We recently required a practical synthesis of cyclohep-
tane-1,3-dione (1) for preparation of multikilogram quantities
of a potential drug candidate. Several literature preparations
of this compound were identified, but none were deemed
suitable for large scale preparation of clinical drug supplies
Scheme 2
1-7
(
e.g., several used heavy metal or potentially explosive
1
3
reagents, such as ethyl diazoacetate, PhHg(CBr
OCH , or Hg(OAc) ). Reported herein is a three-step
3
), ClCH
2
-
5
6
3 2
synthesis of cycloheptane-1,3-dione from cyclopentanone,
which proceeds in 58-64% overall yield and requires no
purification of intermediates.
Discussion
expansion from cyclopentanone (Scheme 2). Our plan was
Several synthetic approaches were considered prior to
identification of the ultimately successful route. For ex-
ample, Wacker oxidation of cyclohepten-3-one with tert-
1
1
to utilize the known [2 + 2] adduct 3 of dichloroketene
and 1-(trimethylsiloxy)cyclopentene, which contains the
requisite seven carbon atoms and has the proper 1,3-oxygen
substitution for cycloheptane-1,3-dione. This strategy has
2
butylhydroperoxide and PdCl was found to be selective for
the desired 1,3-diketone, as anticipated on the basis of a
literature report.8 However, a tert-butyl impurity contami-
nated the product diketone and adversely affected the
subsequent steps in the sequence.
Another route investigated was Noyori’s palladium-
mediated rearrangement of 2,3-epoxycycloheptanone to
cycloheptane-1,3-dione (Scheme 1).4 As per the original
1
2
direct precedent in the work of Pak et al., who reported a
two-step conversion of 3-trimethylsiloxy-2,2-dichlorocy-
clobutanones into 1,3-diketones via Bu
rination to the 3-trimethylsiloxycyclobutanone, followed by
Bu NF-induced desilylation and ring opening to the 1,3-
diketone.
for the strategy, Bu
3
SnH-mediated dechlo-
4
13-15
While this work provides excellent precedent
SnH was clearly unacceptable for our
3
3 4
report, using 4-8 mol % of Pd(Ph P) and 1,2-bis(diphe-
purposes due to both handling toxicity and potential con-
tamination of clinical drug supplies.
nylphosphino)ethane (dpe), complete conversion to the
desired diketone was realized in 12-16 h. We also found
that using BINAP in place of dpe allowed the catalyst load
to be reduced to 2-3 mol % without adversely affecting the
rate of rearrangement.9 Ultimately, however, the cost of
reagents and access to the epoxide were deemed prohibitive
for a multikilogram campaign.
A shorter, more practical synthesis of cycloheptane-1,3-
dione was realized upon consideration of a two carbon ring
Zinc-acetic acid is a well precedented reagent for
1
6
reduction of 2,2-dichloroketones. While numerous ex-
amples of 2,2-dichlorocyclobutanone reductions are found
10
(9) Most experiments were performed with (S)-BINAP, and (R)-BINAP was
equally effective. To our surprise, racemic BINAP led to incomplete
conversion (<20%). Remarkably, using the same bottles of (S)- and (R)-
BINAP which worked well at 3 mol %, an “artificial” racemate from 1.5
mol % each of the (S)- and (R)-enantiomers also failed. These results have
yet to be adequately explained (and are particularly perplexing since the
substrate is racemic and the product diketone is achiral).
*
To whom correspondence should be sent. Phone (860) 441-6334.
(
(
(
1) Eistert, B.; Haupter, F.; Schank, K. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1963, 665, 55-67.
(10) The epoxide was prepared in three steps from cycloheptanone: (i) Br
THF-H O; (ii) Li CO , LiBr, DMF; (iii) H , NaOH, MeOH.
(11) Krepski, L. R.; Hassner, A. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3173-3179.
2
,
2) Maclean, I.; Sneeden, R. P. A. Tetrahedron 1965, 21, 31-34.
2
2
3
2 2
O
3) Hutmacher, H.-M.; Kruger, H.; Musso, H. Chem. Ber. 1977, 110, 3118-
3
125.
(12) Pak, C. S.; Kim, S. K.; Lee, H. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 6011-
(4) Suzuki, M.; Watanabe, A.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 2095-
6014.
2
096.
(13) Pak, C. S.; Kim, S. K. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 1954-1957.
(14) Brady, W. T.; Lloyd, R. M. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 2560-2564.
(
(
(
5) Nishiguchi, I.; Hirashima, T. Chem. Lett. 1981, 551-554.
6) Bhusan, V.; Chandrasekaran, S. Synth. Commun. 1984, 14, 339-345.
7) Vankar, Y. D.; Chaudhuri, N. C.; Rao, C. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28,
(15) Footnote 11 in ref 13 states that dechlorination of 3 (Bu
3
SnH) followed by
desilylation with Bu NF does, indeed, form cycloheptane-1,3-dione. No
4
5
51-554.
experimental details are provided.
(16) Noyori, R.; Hayakawa, Y. Org. React. 1983, 29, 163-344.
(
8) Tsuji, J.; Nagashima, H.; Hori, K. Chem. Lett. 1980, 257-260.
1
0.1021/op9802069 CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society and Royal Society of Chemistry
Vol. 2, No. 6, 1998 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
379
Published on Web 10/07/1998