Scheme 1
Table 1. Three-Component Reaction of Methyl
Phenyldiazoacetate with Aniline and Imine Catalyzed by
Dirhodium(II) Acetate
sulfide intercepts the metal carbene, and aziridination takes
4,5
place via nucleophilic addition of a sulfur ylide to an imine.
The insertion of a metal carbenoid generated from a diazo
compound into an N-H bond, which leads to C-N bond
formation (Scheme 2), is a known process.1 There have been
,6
yield,a
%
isomer ratio of 5b
entry
Ar
R
4:5b
threo:erythro
Scheme 2
a
b
c
d
e
C6H5
H
H
H
H
H
68
72
76
72
58
60:40
64:36
54:46
31:69
14:86
9:91
6:94
4:96
4:96
4:96
p-FC6H4
p-ClC6H4
p-CF3C6H4
p-NO2C6H4
a
Isolated yield of 4 + 5 after column chromatography purification.
b
1
Determined by H NMR of crude product.
numerous demonstrations of the versatility of this reaction.
For example, this approach has been particularly fruitful in
7
the synthesis of penicillins and related â-lactams.
Further investigation revealed that the concentration of
imine was an important factor for driving the reaction to
A novel three-component reaction is reported here. By
reaction of phenyldiazoacetate with both imine and amine
in the presence of dirhodium acetate catalyst, no aziridine
product is obtained. Instead, we find a 1,2-diamine product.
For example, treatment of phenyldiazoacetate 1 with a
mixture of equal amounts of arylamine 2 and imine 3 with
dirhodium acetate catalyst gives N-H insertion product 4
8
and 1,2-diamines 5 in good yield (Table 1). While the
product ratio is dependent on electronic features from aryl
substitution of the corresponding amine (Table 1), diaste-
reoselectivity of 5 is consistently high.
As seen from Table 1, the more electron withdrawing is
the substituent attached to the arylamine, the higher is the
ratio of diamines product 5 over N-H insertion 4 (Table 1,
entries c, d, and e). The structure and relative configuration
of major diastereomer 5a was confirmed by single-crystal
9
X-ray analysis to be erythro (Figure 1).
Figure 1. X-ray structure of erythro-5a.
(
4) (a) Li, A. H.; Dai, L. X.; Aggarwal, V. K. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97,
341. (b) Aggarwal, V. K. Synlett 1998, 329.
5) (a) Aggarwal, V. K.; Ferrara, M.; O’Brien, C. J.; Thompson, A.; Jones,
2
(
R. V. H.; Fieldhouse, R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 1635. (b)
Aggarwal, V. K.; Alonso, E.; Fang, G. Y.; Ferrara, M.; Hynd, G.; Porcelloni,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1433.
diamine formation (Table 2). As expected from such a
competitive process, increasing the initial concentration of
(
6) For reviews of this area, see: (a) Maas, G. Top. Curr. Chem. 1987,
1
37, 75. (b) Davies, H. M. L. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost,
(9) (a) Crystal data for 5a(erythro): C28H25N3O4, MW ) 467.51,
orthorhombic, space group Pna2(1), a ) 26.465(5) Å, b ) 9.181(1) Å, c
B. M., Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1991; Vol. 4, Chapter 4.8. (c) Padwa,
A.; Krumpe, K. E. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 5385. (d) Kirmse, G. Carbene
Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Academic: New York, 1971; pp 409-412. (e) Aller,
E.; Buck, R. T.; Drysdale, M. J.; Ferris, L.; Haigh, D.; Moody, C. J.; Pearson,
N. D.; Sanghera, J. B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 2879.
3
3
) 9.973(2) Å, V ) 2423.2(9) Å , Z ) 4, pcalcd ) 1.281 Mg/m , F(000) )
-
1
984, λ ) 0.71073 Å, T ) 296(2) K, µ(Mo KR) ) 0.087 mm . Data for
the structure were collected on a Siemens P-4X four-circle diffractometer.
Intensity measurements were performed on a crystal (dimensions 0.58 ×
0.56 × 0.30 mm) in the range 3.08 < 2θ < 55.98°. Of the 3568 measured
reflections, 3077 were independent (Rint ) 0.0087). The structure was solved
by direct methods (SHELXS-97) and refined by full-matrix least-squares
(7) (a) Lama, L. D.; Christensen, B. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19, 4233.
(
b) Salzmann, T. N.; Ratcliffe, R. W.; Christensen, B. G.; Bouffard, F. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 6161. (c) Melillo, D. G.; Shinkai, I.; Liu, T.;
Ryan, K.; Sletzinger, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 2783.
2
on F . The final refinements converged at R1 ) 0.0366 for I > 2σ(I), wR2
(
8) For review and recent reports on 1,2-diamines synthesis, see: (a)
Lucet, D.; Gall, T. Le.; Mioskowski, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
581. (b) Westermann, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 151.
) 0.0720 for all data. The final difference Fourier synthesis gave a min/
-
3
max residual electron density of -0.126/+0.139 eÅ . (b) CCDC-211231
2
contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data
3924
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 21, 2003