Y.-J. Bian et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 17 (2010) 58–60
59
Table 1
OH
O
C
Optimization of the allylation reaction of C6H5CHO mediated by SnCl2 in water under
ultrasonic irradiation with various conditions.
SnCl2/H2O
CH2
CH
CH2
Br
CH
CH2
R1
R2
C
CH2
R2
Entry
Reaction system
Time/h
Isolated yield/%
R1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:1:1
benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:1:1
benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:1:1
benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:1:1
benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:1:1
benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:1:1
benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:1:1
benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:2:1
benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:3:1
benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:4:1
benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:3:1
benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:3:2
1
2
3
4
5
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
38
45
60
72
76
77
75
80
86
85
86
85
1 (a-h)
2 (a-h)
Scheme 1.
1 mmol) and H2O (4 mL). The mixture was irradiated in the water
bath of an ultrasonic cleaner under an air conditions at 25–30 °C
for 5 h or stirring 24 h (monitored by TLC). After the completion
of the reaction, the resulting suspension was filtered. The filtrate
was extracted with ethyl acetate (3Â10 mL). The combined organic
layers were washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution and
brine, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate for 12 h and fil-
tered. Ethyl acetate was evaporated under reduced pressure to give
the crude product, which was separated by column chromatogra-
phy on silica (200–300 mesh), eluted with petroleum ether or a
mixture of petroleum ether and diethyl ether. All the products
were confirmed by IR, MS, 1H NMR, spectral data.
9
10
11
12
Isolated yield based on the substrate; H2O: 4 ml; Ultrasound irradiation: 40 kHZ.
Table 2
The allylation reactions of aromatic aldehydes and ketones mediated in SnCl2–H2O
system under ultrasound irradiation or stirring.
Entry
Substrate
Isolated yield (%)
Stirring (24 h)
2a 1H NMR: dH2.40 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.90–2.98 (br, 1H), 4.58 (t,
J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.02–5.05 (m, 1H), 5.04–5.06 (m, 1H), 5.64–5.70 (m,
Ultrasound (5 h)
1H), 7.25–7.68 (m, 5H). MS m/z (%): 148 (M+). IR (KBr)
m: 3405,
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
C6H5CHO
4-ClC6H4CHO
furfural
cinnamaldehyde
3, 4-(OCH2O)C6H3CHO
4-CH3OC6H4CHO
C6H5COC6H5
84
77
58
71
77
84
–
86
76
59
73
79
84
–
1191, 990 cmÀ1
.
2b 1H NMR: dH2.41 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.03–3.10 (br, 1H), 4.57 (t,
J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.05–5.08 (m, 1H), 5.10 (m, 1H), 5.68–5.72 (m, 1H),
7.18 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H). MS m/z (%): 182
(M+). IR (KBr) : 3406, 1195, 985 cmÀ1
m .
1g
1h
C6H5COCH3
21
31
2c 1H NMR: dH 1.90–2.15 (br, 1H), 2.63 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.72 (t,
J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.15–5.18 (m, 1H), 5.15–5.20 (m, 1H), 5.76–5.82 (m,
1H), 6.28–6.36 (m, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H), 7.26–7.40 (m, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H). MS
Ultrasound irradiation time for 5 h and stirring for 24 h.
m/z (%): 138 (M+). IR (KBr) : 3401, 1192, 992 cmÀ1
m .
ing homoallylic alcohols(2a, 2b, 2d, 2e, 2f) was only 84%, 77%, 71%,
77% and 84%, respectively. The data indicates that the reaction time
gets reduced remarkably under ultrasound irradiation condition. In
order to expose the effects of carbonyl group of ketone, we choose
benzophenone (1g) and acetophenone (1h) as substrates. It is
found that there were no products with benzophenone as sub-
strate. While acetophenone as substrate the corresponding prod-
ucts were obtained only in 31% and 21% yield under ultrasound
irradiation or stirring respectively. We can infer that the steric hin-
drance around the carbonyl group may inhibit the allylation
reactions.
2d 1H NMR: dH 2.02 (1H, s), 2.40–2.50 (2H, m), 4.32–4.44 (1H, t),
5.14–5.26 (2H, m), 5.78–5.88 (1H, m), 6.60–6.72 (1H, m), 7.18–7.40
(5H, m). MS m/z (%): 174 (M+). IR (KBr) : 3400, 1642, 988 cmÀ1
m .
2e 1H NMR: dH 2.40 (t, J=6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.49–2.60 (br, 1H), 4.56 (t,
J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 5.08 (m, 1H), 5.10 (m, 1H), 5.68–5.76 (m, 1H), 5.90
(s, 2H), 6.68–6.74 (m, 2H), 6.80 (s, 1H). MS m/z (%): 192 (M+). IR
(KBr) m .
: 3420, 1192, 990 cmÀ1
2f 1H NMR: dH 2.43 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.79–2.86 (br, 1H), 3.76 (s,
3H), 4.61 (t, J = 6.6, 1H), 5.04–5.09 (m, 1H), 5.08–5.12 (m, 1H),
5.72–5.82 (m, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.8, 2H), 7.21(d, J = 8.8, 2H). MS m/
z (%): 178 (M+). IR (KBr)
m: 3410, 1191, 991.
2h 1H NMR: dH 1.23–1.42 (s, 3H), 1.48–1.73 (s, 1H), 2.26–2.60
(d, 2H), 4.62–5.08 (d, 2H), 5.16–5.69 (m, 1H), 6.86–7.39 (m, 5H).
4. Conclusion
MS m/z (%): 162 (M+). IR (KBr)
m: 3430, 1192, 990.
Based on those results, we demonstrated that ultrasound irradi-
ation can speed up markedly the allylation reaction of aromatic
aldehydes and ketones with SnCl2–H2O system. Compared with tra-
ditional stirring methods, ultrasonic irradiation is more convenient
and efficient. More importantly, the allylation reaction was carried
out in water, so the environmental concerns were improved.
3. Result and discussion
With our optimized the conditions, we screened the reaction of
benzaldehyde with allyl bromide in a variety of SnCl2–H2O reaction
system (Table 1). From the result in Table 1, the optimized reaction
conditions are: benzaldehyde:allyl bromide:SnCl2 = 1:3:1, time:
5 h.
Acknowledgement
In order to demonstrate the positive effect of ultrasound irradi-
ation on the reaction, the same reaction in Entries(a–h) (Table 2)
also has been researched under stirring.
The project was supported by Science and Technology Founda-
tion of Hebei Province (04213041) and Science Foundation of He-
bei Lang Fang Normal College.
As shown in Scheme 1 and Table 2, the allylation reaction was
carried out under ultrasonic irradiation or stirring giving higher
yield. For example, benzaldehyde (1a), p-Cl-benzaldehyde (1b),
Cinnamaldehyde (1d), Piperonal (1e) and p-CH3O-benzaldehyde
(1f) reacted with allyl bromide in SnCl2–H2O system giving 86%,
76%, 73%, 79% and 84% yield of the corresponding homoallylic alco-
hols (2a, 2b, 2d, 2e, 2f) under ultrasonic irradiation for 5 h.
Whereas in case with stirring for 24 h, the yield of the correspond-
References
[1] B.J. Wakefield, in: A.R. Katritzky, O. Meth-Cohn, C.W. Rees (Eds.),
Organomagnesium Methods in Organic Synthesis, Best Synthetic Methods
Series, Academic Press, San Diego, 1995.
[2] C.L. Zhou, Z.G. Zha, Z.Y. Wang, J.H. Wu, Simple and clean synthesis: tin-
mediated allylation of carbonyl compound in water, Chin. J. Chem. 20 (2002)
718–721.