Organic Letters
Letter
aliphatic gem-difluoroalkene 1a as the substrate. In addition,
this reaction could not provide the triborylated and
tetraborylated compounds, which were produced via copper
catalysis reported by the Shi group.8 1,2-Bis(boryl)alkanes are
an important class of synthons that have attracted much
attention due to their versatile transformation. Several
important methods for the synthesis of 1,2-bis(boryl)alkanes
from alkenes or alkynes have been reported.11 Although
significant progress has been developed, the iron-catalyzed
synthesis of 1,2-bis(boryl)alkanes is still attractive.
diboron 2a, a 63% yield was provided (Table 1, entry 9). Other
solvents were also investigated, and this reaction proceeded
well in ether solvents (for details, see the Supporting
Information). Dioxane could provide the desired product in
47% yield, and THF was the best choice (Table 1, entries 9
and 10). Some additives as proton resources were added to
improve the efficiency of this conversion (Table 1, entries 11−
methanol was used as the additive, 68% yield was obtained
using JohnPhos as the ligand (Table 1, entry 12). Gratifyingly,
the best result (85% yield upon 1H NMR) was provided when
tert-butyl alcohol was used (Table 1, entry 13), and only 64%
of the isolated yield was obtained due to the instability of alkyl
1,2-bis(boronates) 3a in our catalytic system. Control
experiments demonstrated the importance of additive, and
only 53% yield was obtained in the absence of tert-butyl
alcohol (Table 1, entry 14). Only the moderate yield was
provided without ligands, and no desired product was observed
in the absence of the iron catalyst, which demonstrated the
necessity of iron catalysts (Table 1, entries 15 and 16). Some
transition metals, such as copper, palladium, and nickel
sources, were also tested, but no desired product was observed
After establishing the optimized reaction conditions, we set
out to evaluate the scope of the iron-catalyzed diborylation of
gem-difluoroalkenes. As shown in Table 2, various unactivated
aliphatic gem-difluoroalkenes could undergo this transforma-
tion smoothly, and the corresponding products were afforded
in moderate isolated yields. Substrates containing an aromatic
ring at the carbon chain performed this diborylation well,
affording the desired products in moderate yields. Gratifyingly,
this reaction showed excellent functional group tolerance. For
instance, CF3, F, Cl, Br, OBn, carboxylate, TIPS, and
carbamate were well-tolerated in this catalytic system (3d,
3e, 3i, 3j, 3n, 3o, 3r, 3s, and 3t). gem-Difluoroalkenes with a
fluoro or chloro group on the aromatic ring reacted well, and
58% yield was delivered (3i, 3j). In addition, substrates bearing
a chloro or bromo group underwent this transformation
smoothly, and the diborylated products were obtained in
moderate yields (3n, 3o). The saturated linear substrate could
also perform this diborylation, and 56% yield was obtained
(3u). The heteroaromatic ring could be tolerated as well, and
the desired product was produced in 60% yield (3m).
Substrates with a substituted alkyl group near the gem-
difluoroalkenyl group performed this conversion well, and the
diborylated products were generated in moderate yields (3k,
3l). The excellent value of this iron-catalyzed 1,2-diborylation
reaction was further exhibited in its application in biomole-
cules. Citronellol, myrac aldehyde, and diacetone-D-glucose-
derived gem-difluoroalkenes performed this transformation
smoothly, as shown in Table 2, and the alkenyl group could
be well-tolerated, affording the desired 1,2-diborylated
products in moderate yields (3v, 3w, 3x).
Encouraged by these results, other iron salts were tested in
the presence of dppp (Table 1, entries 1−4; for details, see the
Table 1. Representative Results for the Optimization of the
a
Iron-Catalyzed Defluoroborylation of 1a
b
yield
entry
[Fe]
ligand
dppp
dppp
dppp
dppp
Xantphos
Mephos
TMEDA
P(o-tol)3
P(o-tol)3
P(o-tol)3
P(o-tol)3
solvent
additive
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Fe(acac)3
Fe(OAc)2
Fe(OTO3
FeBr2
Fe(OAc)2
Fe(OAc)2
Fe(OAc)2
Fe(OAc)2
Fe(OAc)2
Fe(OAc)2
Fe(OAc)2
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
dioxane
THF
28
50
12
46
36
50
40
60
63
47
61
c
9
c
10
l1
c
MeOH
(2.0 equiv)
MeOH
(2.0 equiv)
t-BuOH
(5.0 equiv)
c
12
Fe(OAc)2
Fe(OAc)2
JohnPhos
JohnPhos
JohnPhos
THF
THF
68
d
13
85 (64)
d
14
Fe(OAc)2
Fe(OAc)2
THF
THF
53
63
d
15
t-BuOH
(5.0 equiv)
t-BuOH
d
16
JohnPhos
THF
0
providing the desired product 3a in 50% yield (Table 1, entry
2). Poor yields were obtained using high-valent iron salts, such
as Fe(acac)3 or Fe(OTf)3 (Table 1, entry 1 and entry 3).
Subsequently, when Fe(OAc)2 was used as the catalyst, other
ligands were carefully screened. The bidentate or monodentate
phosphine ligands and nitrogen-based ligands could promote
this transformation smoothly (Table 1, entries 5−8; for details,
obtained using tri(o-tolyl)phosphine as the ligand (Table 1,
entry 8). By slightly increasing the loading of bis(pinacolato)-
In the previous work,8 the unactivated gem-dibromoalkenes
were not suitable for copper-catalyzed borylation. Encouraged
by the results of the iron-catalyzed 1,2-diborylation of
unactivated gem-difluoroalkenes, we wondered whether the
fluorine group was necessary for our developed protocol.
Therefore, according to the literature, the unactivated gem-
dibromoalkene 1a′ and gem-dichloroalkene 1a′′ were synthe-
sized to perform this conversion. As shown in Scheme 2, the
1
excellent yields determined by H NMR were observed, but
moderate isolated yields were obtained due to the instability of
5566
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 5565−5570