352
A. Yardan et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 137 (2015) 351–356
magnetization relaxation, magnetization hysteresis and quantum
tunneling of the magnetization (QTM) [14,15].
slowly to the mixture with constant stirring. The solution was fil-
tered and then allowed to stand at room temperature for three
days. Blue crystals of complex 2 were collected by filtration and
dried in an air atmosphere. Calcd. Found for 2 (C23H32Cl2N4NiO4Zn)
Yield: 0.39 g. (62%), C, 44.3; H, 5.13; N, 8.98. Found: C, 43.7; H,
5.02; N, 8.82%.
Salen type tetradentate (ONNO) Schiff base ligands derived
from N,N0-bis(salicylidene)-1,3-diaminopropane (H2L), have been
used for complexation in recent years [16,17]. Salen-type Schiff
base complexes themselves can act as ligand-complexes and can
chelate a second metal substrate using phenolate oxygen atoms
of the Schiff base ligand to construct extended homo- or hetero-
polynuclear complexes [18–22].
X-ray structure determination
Recently, the structural characterization of homodinuclear
ZnAZnCl2 [23,24], ZnAZnBr2 [25], CoACoCl2 [26], CuACuCl2 [27]
and heterodinuclear NiAHgCl2 [28,29], NiAHgBr2 [30], NiAZnCl2
[31,32], NiAZnBr2 [33], NiACoCl2 [34], NiACoBr2 [34], ZnACdBr2
[35], ZnAHgI2 [36] ONNO type Schiff base complexes have been
reported. To the best of our knowledge, the structural characteriza-
tion of the phenoxo-bridged heterodinuclear ZnANiCl2, ONNO type
Schiff base complex, (2), is described here for the first time.
This work reports the synthesis of two new phenoxo-bridged
heterodinuclear NiIIAHgII (1) and ZnIIANiII (2) complexes along
with their characterization, single crystal X-ray structures and
thermal studies.
Intensity data for suitable single crystals of 1 and 2 were col-
lected using an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur-3 single crystal X-ray
diffractometer equipped with
a
Mo
Ka radiation source
(k = 0.71073 Å at 296 K). Data collection and data reductions were
performed using the CRYSALIS CCD and CRYSALIS RED programs
[37]. The structures were solved by direct methods and refined
using full-matrix least-squares against F2 using SHELXTL [38]. All
non-hydrogen atoms were assigned anisotropic displacement
parameters and refined without positional constraints. Hydrogen
atoms were included in idealised positions with isotropic displace-
ment parameters constrained to 1.5 times the Uequiv of their
attached carbon atoms for methyl hydrogens, and 1.2 times the
Uequiv of their attached carbon atoms for all others. The Level B
Alerts result from the C3, C6, C8, C9, C23 atoms for complex 1
and the C20 atom for complex 2 which were refined isotropically
due to its high thermal motion. The absolute structure was deter-
mined on the basis of the Flack parameter [39] x = 0.063(9) for 1
and 0.042(16) for 2. A Flack parameter value close to 0 is indicative
of a non-centrosymmetric structure.
Details of the data collection parameters and crystallographic
information for the complexes are summarized in Table 1. Selected
bond lengths and angles are listed in Table 2 for complex 1 and
Table 3 for complex 2, respectively. Hydrogen bond geometries
of the complexes are shown in Table 4. Molecular drawings were
obtained using MERCURY [40]. The crystal structures of 1 and 2
along with the atom numbering scheme are given in Figs. 1 and
3, respectively. Packing diagrams are displayed in Fig. 2 for 1 and
in Fig. 4 for 2.
Experimental section
Materials and methods
All reagents and solvents were purchased from Merck, Aldrich
or Carlo Erba and used without further purification. Elemental
analyses for the ligand and complex were carried out using stan-
dard methods with a Eurovector 3018 CHNS analyzer. IR spectra
were recorded using a Perkin–Elmer 1600 series automatic record-
ing FT-IR spectrophotometer with the KBr disk technique over the
range 400–4000 cmꢂ1. The thermogravimetry/differential thermal
analysis (TG/DTA) measurements were undertaken using a Perkin
Elmer Diamond DTA/TG thermal analyzer. In this study, thermo-
gravimetric curves were obtained using a flow rate of the nitrogen
carrier gas (at 3 bar) of 200 mL/min and a heating rate of 20 °C/min
and with ceramic crucibles.
Synthesis
Table 1
Synthesis of complex 1
Crystal data and structure refinements for 1 and 2.
N,N0-bis(salicylidene)-1,3-propanediamine (H2L) was prepared
by reacting a basic ethanolic solution of salicylaldehyde and 1,3-
diamino propane as described previously in the literature [33]. Tri-
ethylamine (Et3N) was added dropwise to the solution of Schiff
base ligand (1 mmol, 0.282 g) in 20 mL DMF. A solution of NiCl2.6-
H2O (1 mmol, 0.237 g) in ethanol (20 mL) was added to the DMF
solution. The solution was stirred at the boiling point under an
air atmosphere. A solution of HgCl2 (1 mmol, 0.271 g) in ethanol
(20 mL) was added to the resulting solution and this too was stir-
red at the boiling point under an air atmosphere. The solution was
filtered and then allowed to stand at room temperature for five
days. Green crystals of complex 1 were collected by filtration and
dried in an air atmosphere. Calcd. Found for 1 (C23H30Cl2HgN4-
NiO4): Yield: 0.51 g. (68%), C, 36.4; H, 3.96; N, 7.40. Found: C,
35.7; H, 4.12; N, 7.58%.
1
2
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
C
23H30Cl2HgN4NiO4
C23H32Cl2N4NiO4Zn
623.51 g molꢂ1
Monoclinic
756.71 g molꢂ1
Monoclinic
Cc
Cc
a = 10.5428 (11) Å
b = 15.1258 (19) Å
c = 17.350 (3) Å
b = 97.479 (13)°
2743.3 (6) Å3
4
a = 10.4994 (5) Å
b = 15.1545 (7) Å
c = 17.1967 (6) Å
b = 98.709 (4)°
2704.7 (2) Å3
4
Volume
Z
Density (calculated)
Absorption
coefficient
h range for data
collection
1.832 g.cmꢂ3
6.51 mmꢂ1
1.531 g cmꢂ3
1.82 mmꢂ1
3.9–27.6°
3.9–28.8°
Index ranges
ꢂ10 6 h 6 13,
ꢂ19 6 k 6 19,
ꢂ22 6 l 6 22
6649
ꢂ8 6 h 6 14
ꢂ20 6 k 6 20
ꢂ23 6 l 6 23
7114
Synthesis of complex 2
Reflections collected
Independent
reflections
Complexes 1 and 2 were prepared using similar methods.
Equivalent amounts of triethylamine (Et3N) was added dropwise
to deprotonate the phenolic OH group of the solution Schiff base
ligand (1 mmol, 0.282 g) in DMF (20 mL). To a solution of ZnCl2
(1 mmol, 0.135 g) in ethanol was added to the resulting solution
and it was stirred at boiling point under an air atmosphere. A solu-
tion of NiCl2.6H2O (1 mmol, 0.237 g) in ethanol (20 mL) was added
3773 [Rint = 0.076]
4386 [Rint = 0.024]
Refinement method
Full-matrix least-squares Full-matrix least-squares
on F2
on F2
S = 0.96
R1 = 0.041, wR2 = 0.115
0.042(16)
Goodness-of-fit on F2 S = 0.71
R indices [I > 2
r
(I)]
R1 = 0.046, wR2 = 0.068
0.063(9)
Flack parameter