62
T. Rajabloo et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 607 (2014) 61–66
m
X
controllable impact factors that influence the band-gap energy.
Finally, the results of this program coincide with the experiments
at optimum conditions.
SST
¼
Y2i ꢀ mðYT Þ2
ð7Þ
j¼1
In Eq. (7), m represents the number of experiments; and, YT obtains from
P
m
YT
¼
iꢀ1Yi=m. The factorial sum of squares, SSF, can be calculated by Eq. (8):
2. Experimental procedures
L
X
m
SSF
¼
ðYFL ꢀ YT Þ2
ð8Þ
L
Cobalt chloride (CoCl2), sodium thiosulphate (Na2S2O3), and sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS) (an anionic surfactant with a polar group [18]) have been dissolved
in solvents. Moreover, pure ethanol and its mixtures have been prepared using dis-
tilled water in different v/v percentages as the solvents. These solvents are harmless
and readily available. Then, the content of the reactor has been filtered and the
black precipitates washed several times with distilled water. The final product
has been dried at 60 °C. Finally, the effect of heat treatment on some of the selected
samples has been investigated. The reaction parameters at different levels, shown
in Table 1, have been implemented using the Taguchi method. Then, the results
of 16 experiments have been applied into the formula of the Taguchi method to
anticipate the number of other tests.
k¼1
Here, YFK is the average value of the measurement results of a certain factor in
the kth level. Additionally, the variance of error, VEr, can be obtained by Eq. (9)
[26,27]:
P
D
SST
ꢀ
F¼ASSF
VEr
¼
ð9Þ
m
The Fuzzy Logic Toolbox of MATLAB is a proper tool for the ANFIS processing
section of the research. We implemented 1024 (45) tests, obtained from Eq. (4),
as the ANFIS inputs. Eq. (10) has been used to normalize all of the input data:
The final synthesized materials have been analyzed by X-ray powder diffraction
(XRD), Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR), Ultraviolet Visible (UV–vis.), and Field
Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM). In addition, to calculate band-
gap energy of the final products, the Taus formula has been applied (Eq. (1)) [19,20]:
Xi ꢀ Xmin
Xn
¼
ð10Þ
Xmax ꢀ Xmin
In this stage, we should divide the initial data into the train, validation, and test
Bðhv
ꢀ Eg Þꢀn=2
sets. It is important to utilize the input selection method based on the special ANFIS
properties. The ANFIS model with the smallest root mean squared error (RMSE)
achieves a lower RMSE after one epoch of training when more epochs of training
are given. For this purpose, Jang’s method was selected. Some codes in MATLAB
have been used to make train/validation/test sets, and then these sets trained for
one epoch. The smallest RMSE among 1000 runs has been obtained after one epoch
of training. In addition, various kinds of membership functions (MFs) have been uti-
lized in order to find the optimum ANFIS parameters for the training data. One time,
MFs were the same and the numbers of MFs were equal. Then, the other procedure
with various kinds and different numbers of MFs has been implemented. Due to the
proven high training efficiency for ANFIS [29], bell shaped MFs and the hybrid
method as the learning algorithm have been selected. Finally, the ANFIS model
has been utilized for plotting the interaction effects.
a
¼
ð1Þ
h
v
In this equation, the term hv is the photon energy, Eg stands for the band-gap
energy, and B is a constant that is related to the type of sample. The number n liaises
with the stimulated electron type. The other parameters of this equation were com-
puted by the Butler equations (Eq. (2)) [21,22]:
T ¼ expðꢀ
atÞ
ð2Þ
Here, T is the transition coefficient, and t shows the thickness of the sample
under radiation of UV–vis. All of the necessary calculations for the optimizations
and predictions have been performed based on the Taguchi method by related
equations [22], as shown below:
First, Eq. (3) gives the S/N ratio for the little better status [23–26]:
S=N ¼ ꢀ10log10ðy2Þ
ð3Þ
3. Results and discussion
In Eq. (3), y refers to the amount of band-gap energy. These 16 experiments are
representative of 1024 (45) tests, which will be estimated through the prediction
formula of the Taguchi method, Eq. (4) [24]:
3.1. Experimental results
n
X
The FTIR analysis has been implemented to determine the prod-
uct elements.
ðS=NÞp ¼ ðS=NÞm
þ
½ðS=NÞi ꢀ ðS=NÞm
ꢁ
ð4Þ
i¼1
The FTIR spectra of the samples without heat-treatment indi-
cate that there are no Co-O bond vibrations [25]. As shown in
Fig. 1, the appearance of one strong band (due to the S–O modes)
at about 970 cmꢀ1 is detectable, which is due to the formation of
CoS2.
The achieved XRD patterns showed that all of the materials
without calcinations were in an amorphous state because there
were no appropriate conditions for crystallization (see Fig. 2). On
the other hand, amorphous structures can be due to the atmo-
spheric conditions. The samples under heat-treatment were crys-
talline and the XRD pattern depicted the existence of CoS2
In Eq. (4), (S/N)m is the total mean of the S/N ratio. (S/N)i is the mean S/N ratio at
the predicted level, and n represents the number of main design parameters that
affect the quality characteristics. The analysis of the mean (ANOM) statistical
approach is necessary to construct the main effects. Therefore, we should calculate
the mean of the S/N ratio of each factor at a certain level [27,28]. For example,
v
el¼i
Eq. (5) shows Mlfeactor¼1, which is the mean of the S/N ratio of factor I at level i:
nIj
X
1
nIj
le
v
el¼i
level¼i
M
¼
½S=N
ꢁ
ð5Þ
factor¼1
factor¼1
j
j¼1
where nIi represents the number of appearances of factor I at level i, and ½S=Nlfeactor¼1ꢁ
v
el¼i
j
is the S/N ratio of factor I at level i. The mean of the S/N ratios of other factors at a
certain level, by Eq. (5), have been also determined. In addition to ANOM, the anal-
ysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical method has been used to analyze the influence of
each controllable factor on the band-gap energy of the products. Moreover, the for-
mula for the percentage contribution of each factor,
qF, is (Eq. (6)):
SSF ꢀ ðDOFF ꢀ VEr
Þ
qF
¼
ꢂ 100
ð6Þ
SST
In Eq. (6), DOFF represents the degree of freedom for each factor. DOFF was equal
to three for all factors in this research. The equation to calculate the total sum of
squares, SST, is shown here (Eq. (7)):
Table 1
Controllable factors and levels.
Factor
Description
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
A
B
C
D
E
Tr (°C)
S/Co
Solvent (%)
Surfactant (g)
Tc (°C)
60
0.25
70
0
70
1
80
5
75
4
90
10
330
80
8
100
20
0a
300
360
a
Without calcinations.
Fig. 1. FTIR spectrum of sample 8.