ISSN 0036ꢀ0236, Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2012, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 574–578. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2012.
Original Russian Text © A.V. Ruseikina, L.A. Solov’ev, O.V. Andreev, 2012, published in Zhurnal Neorganicheskoi Khimii, 2012, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 638–642.
PHYSICAL METHODS
OF INVESTIGATION
Crystal Structure of EuLaCuS3
A. V. Ruseikinaa, L. A. Solov’evb, and O. V. Andreeva
a Tyumen State University, ul. Semakova 10, Tyumen, 625003 Russia
b Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences,
ul. Karla Marksa 42, Krasnoyarsk, 660049 Russia
Received January 20, 2011
Abstract—The crystal structure of the EuLaCuS3complex sulfide synthesized for the first time has been
solved by Xꢀray powder diffraction. Crystals are orthorhombic, space group Pnma
a
,
Ba2MnS3ꢀtype structure,
= 4, and ρcalc = 5.669 g/cm3. The La
and Eu atoms are randomly disordered over two crystallographic positions with a coordination number of 7,
and the Eu(La)–S bond lengths range from 2.892(6) to 3.078(6) Å. The CuS4 tetrahedra with Cu–S interꢀ
= 8.1297(3) Å, b = 4.0625(1) Å, c = 15.9810(4) Å, V , Z
= 527.80(3) Å3
atomic distances of 2.358(5)–2.40(1) Å form chains running along the b axis.
DOI: 10.1134/S0036023612030254
Some powder Xꢀray diffraction data on the crystalꢀ the initial sulfides mixed in the ratio 2EuS : 1La2S3 :
chemical characteristics of the SrLaCuS3 complex
sulfide are available from [1]: orthorhombic crystal
Cu2S in a graphite crucible placed into a sealed evacuꢀ
ated doubleꢀwalled quartz ampoule. The ampoule was
heated in an electrical furnace up to 1570 K and
allowed to stay for 30 min. Cooling was conducted in
the switchꢀoff furnace. The samples were annealed in
sealed evacuated quartz ampoules at 970 K for 3000 h.
system, space group Рnmа, a = 11.157(2) Å, b =
4.1003(6) and = 11.545(2) Å. In a singleꢀcrystal
Å
,
c
Xꢀray diffraction experiment, the crystal structure of
PbLaCuS3 was solved by Brennan and Ibers [2]. Crysꢀ
tals are orthorhombic, space group Pnma
8.091(3) = 4.093(1) and = 15.996(5) Å. The
ratio of the ionic radii of sevenꢀcoordinated ions
Sr2+: Pb2+: Eu2+ = 1.21 : 1.23 : 1.2 Å [3]) allows us
, a =
Å,
b
Å
,
c
The identity of the synthesized compound was
confirmed by microstructural analysis (a METAM PB
microscope) and Xꢀray powder diffraction (PANalytiꢀ
cal X’Pert PRO diffractometer equipped with a PIXcel
detector, CoКα radiation, graphite monochromator,
298 K). A powdery sample was prepared by pounding
with addition of octane in an agate mortar. The Xꢀray
diffraction pattern was taken within the diffraction
(
r
r
r
to predict the formation of EuLaCuS3. No informaꢀ
tion on the EuLaСuS3 crystal structure has been
found. The presence of dꢀ and f elements in the crystal
lattice gives rise to practically valuable properties.
Brennan and Ibers [2] noted that PbLaCuS3 is a diaꢀ
magnetic and a semiconductor with a bandgap energy
of 1.5 eV. In EuLnCuS3 compounds (Ln = Eu–Lu) [4] angle range of 10° ≤ 2θ ≤ 125°. The EuLaCuS3 unit
containing nonmagnetic Ln ions, the ferromagnetic
alignment of Eu2+ momentums occurs at 3.4–4.4 K.
The ferromagnetic transition in EuLnCuS3 comꢀ
pounds containing magnetic Ln ions occurs at 5.0 K.
The present paper presents the solution of crystal
structure EuLаCuS3 based on powder Xꢀray diffracꢀ
tion data.
cell parameters were determined with the ITO softꢀ
ware [6]. In addition to the main phase, La3S4, EuS,
and CuLaS2 impurities were found in the sample. The
crystal structure was refined by the derivative differꢀ
ence minimization (DDM) method [7] using Xꢀray
powder diffraction data with consideration for the
effects of preferred orientation, the anisotropic broadꢀ
ening of peaks, and the surface roughness (RꢀDDM =
8.67%, RBragg = 4.39%). The data for isostructural
PbLaCuS3 [2] was used as the initial model. The
experimental, calculated, and difference Xꢀray difꢀ
fraction patterns of the studied sample are compared
in Fig. 1. Atomic coordinates and isotropic thermal
parameters are listed in Table 1. The shortest selected
cation–anion distances (Table 2) were calculated on
the basis of the structural data. The selected bond
angles are given in Table 3. The crystal structures were
EXPERIMENTAL
Cu2S was synthesized from elementary copper (11ꢀ4
high purity grade) and sulfur (15ꢀ3 high purity grade)
in sealed evacuated doubleꢀwalled quartz ampoules.
EuS and La2S3 were synthesized from oxides of EvOꢀZh
and LaOꢀD grades in a Н2S and СS2 flow at 1300 K [5].
According to Xꢀray powder diffraction, the simple sulꢀ
fides were single phases. Within the error of chemical
analysis, the sulfides had the stoichiometric composiꢀ
tions. EuLаCuS3 samples were prepared by alloying visualized with the use of the Diamond 3 software [8].
574