R. Li et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 509 (2011) 8581–8583
8583
Fig. 3. (a) SEM image and (b) SAED pattern of the ZrB2 powder synthesized at 1550 ◦C, the inset in (b) is a TEM image of the ZrB2 particle used to obtain the SAED pattern.
tion of physically absorbed water. The exothermic peaks centered
at 318 and 400 ◦C are attributed to the decomposition of zirco-
nium hydroxide and the formation of amorphous ZrO2 [9]. Another
exothermic peak centered at 440 ◦C was also present. We attribute
this to a phase transformation of amorphous ZrO2 [10]. An in-depth
ature and 1490 ◦C, respectively. Therefore, Reactions (2) and (3)
might occur initially and this is accompanied by the production of
B2O3/B2O2, and then Reaction (6) is induced with a further increase
in temperature. Therefore, an understanding of the many factors
that affect the reaction process is required to understand why the
synthesis of a single ZrB2 phase might occur at 1550 ◦C over 2 h. The
three kinds of metastable reactants affect the temperature required
for the solid-state reactions and also strongly affect the kinetics of
the transformation.
Fig. 3a shows a SEM image of the ZrB2 powder synthesized using
the as-synthesized hydrous nano-ZrO2, boron and 5 wt.% nano-
carbon at 1550 ◦C over 2 h. It reveals a plate-like morphology for the
ZrB2 particles with a uniform size distribution and average particle
size of ca. 1.0 m in two-dimensions. Additionally, a TEM image and
SAED pattern are shown in Fig. 3b. The ZrB2 particles are, therefore,
single crystals and well crystallized.
composition of the precipitated precursor after calcination. We
found that the precipitated precursor that was dried at 60 ◦C was
amorphous and that this state was retained at up to 400 ◦C, as
shown in Fig. 1b. It then transformed to t-ZrO2 at 600 ◦C. Since we
found an exothermic peak at 440 ◦C using TG–DTA, t-ZrO2 likely
starts to form at about 440 ◦C. Additionally, the diffraction peak
centered at 28.1◦ is assigned to m-ZrO2, which was obtained after
calcination at 650 ◦C. With an increase in temperature, the diffrac-
tion intensity of m-ZrO2 became stronger whereas that of t-ZrO2
decreased. These results indicate that the precipitated precursor
initially transforms to t-ZrO2 and then to m-ZrO2. In other words,
TG-DTA and XRD show that as-synthesized hydrous ZrO2 is amor-
phous and it undergoes several changes in lattice structure during
calcination. These continuous nascent states would benefit the
synthesis of ZrB2. In addition, the specific surface area of the pre-
cipitated precursor was found to be 322 m2/g and, therefore, the
as-synthesized hydrous ZrO2 is fine.
4. Conclusions
A single phase of ZrB2 powder was successfully synthesized with
B/Zr (mol.) = 4, and 5 wt.% carbon by BCTR using as-synthesized
amorphous hydrous nano-ZrO2, amorphous boron and nanocarbon
at 1550 ◦C over 2 h. The morphology was plate-like and the average
size of the ZrB2 particles was ca. 1.0 m in two-dimensions.
To clarify the above-mentioned supposition the effects of
nanocarbon on the processes of the two different reaction systems
were investigated by excluding and including nanocarbon in the
binary system of the as-synthesized hydrous nano-ZrO2 and amor-
phous boron (B/Zr (mol.) = 4). XRD patterns of the final products
shown in Fig. 2a. The product obtained after calcination at 1100 ◦C
28.1◦ and 31.4◦ are assigned to m-ZrO2. With an increase in tem-
perature, the diffraction intensity of m-ZrO2 became weaker (see
Fig. 2a, 1450 ◦C) and finally a single phase of ZrB2 was present at
1550 ◦C.
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the financial support from the National
Science Foundation of China (NSFC50974007); the Scientific
Research Starting Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese
Scholars, Ministry of Education; the Start-Up Fund for High-End
Returned Overseas Talents, Ministry of Human Resources and
Social Security, China (Renshetinghan 2010, No. 411) and the Lab-
Installation Foundation of Beihang University for New Teachers.
References
Fig. 2b shows XRD patterns of the products synthesized without
nanocarbon. ZrB2 and m-ZrO2 were observed at calcination temper-
atures up to 1550 ◦C. Therefore, we conclude that the results of the
synthesis at 1100 ◦C were independent of the presence or absence
of nanocarbon. However, an increase in the synthesis temperature
up to 1550 ◦C gave different results: the complete disintegration of
ZrO2 was observed in the presence of nanocarbon and the residuum
of ZrO2 was present in the absence of nanocarbon. Therefore, the
effects of nanocarbon on the reduction of ZrO2 are evident. As noted
above, Reactions (2) and (6) can occur at higher than room temper-
[1] L. Chen, Y. Gu, Z. Yang, L. Shi, J. Ma, Y. Qian, Scripta Mater. 50 (2004) 959–961.
[2] M. Brochu, B.D. Gauntt, L. Boyer, R.E. Loehman, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 29 (2009)
1493–1499.
[3] S.L. Ran, O.V. Biest, J. Vleugels, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93 (2010) 1586–1590.
[4] P. Millet, T. Hwang, J. Mater. Sci. 31 (1996) 351–355.
[5] W.M. Guo, G.J. Zhang, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92 (2009) 264–267.
[6] Z. Jiang, W.E. Rhine, Chem. Mater. 4 (1992) 497–500.
[7] H. Zhao, Y. He, Z.Z. Jin, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78 (1995) 2534–2536.
[8] W.G. Fahrenholtz, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88 (2005) 3509–3512.
[9] A. Mondal, S. Ram, Ceram. Int. 30 (2004) 239–249.
[10] H.Y. Zhu, B. Liu, M.M. Shen, Y. Kong, X. Hong, Y.H. Hu, W.P. Ding, L. Dong, Y.
Chen, Mater. Lett. 58 (2004) 3107–3110.