Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 2 of 10
2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
chromatography on silica gel in 3% yield and 40% yield,
1
respectively. In contrast, the combination of (R,R)-
SINpEt∙HBF4, and (S,S)-DPEN gave only trace amounts of
Ru(II)-NHC-diamine complexes thus demonstrating a
strong matched/mismatched effect. X-ray and NMR anal-
yses revealed that ruthenium complex C2 is structurally
similar to complex C1. Unexpectedly, ruthenium mono-
chloride C3 contains an unusual tridentate binding of the
diamine through an additional cyclometalation. This
metal–carbon bond is formed through C–H activation at
the 2-positon of the phenyl ring (13C NMR shift: δ 176.5 in
toluene-d8).10 Similar to C1 and C2, the chelating NHC lig-
and in C3 binds via carbene coordination and η2-naphthyl
coordination. Despite the polar carbon–metal bond, com-
plex C3 is not sensitive to air and moisture in the solid state.
However, C3 decomposes in solution over time. C3 was
also confirmed to remain a single conformer in solution by
NMR spectroscopy (in C6D6, toluene-d8, or THF-d8). It is
noteworthy that the addition of an excess of HCl (4.0 M in
dioxane) to the C3 solution (n-hexane, toluene, or THF)
did not convert the mono-chloride complex to dichloride
complex C2. Likewise, treatment of dichloride C2 with a
strong base like NaOt-Bu did not yield mono-chloride C3.
According to the same one pot procedure, precatalyst C4,
C4a, C5 and C6 were prepared (Table 1).
2.1. Synthesis and Structure of Ru(II)-NHC-Diamine
Complexes. First, we developed a stepwise way to install
a chiral NHC ligand and a chiral diamine ligand into one
ruthenium complex (Figure 1). We hypothesized that silver
carbene complexes could serve as carbene transfer agents
for the synthesis of the ruthenium complexes as this strat-
egy had previously been used for the synthesis of palladium
and gold complexes.8 The NHC silver complex C0 was pre-
pared from imidazolinium chloride (R,R)-INpEt∙HCl and
Ag2O according to the literature.9 The desired heteroleptic
complex C1 was obtained in 56% overall yield following the
transmetallation of the NHC from silver complex C0 to the
ruthenium precursor and subsequent replacement of ben-
zene with (R,R)-1,2-diphenylethylenediamine (DPEN). The
isolated complex C1 is stable to air and moisture and can
be stored in an ordinary vial for months. X-ray crystallo-
graphic analysis of C1 indicated a distorted octahedral ge-
ometry of the ruthenium center with a trans-dichloro ge-
ometry. Interestingly, the NHC ligand is acting as a chelate
ligand with a dative carbene bond and an additional η2-co-
ordination of the naphthyl ring to ruthenium. This was fur-
ther verified by the distinct NMR signals at δ 4.99 (1H NMR,
HC12), δ 92.0 (13C NMR, C11), and δ 72.7 (13C NMR, C12).
The NMR analysis of trans-RuCl2(INpEt)(DPEN) C1 shows
that C1 exists as a single conformer in solution (C6D6,
CDCl3, or THF-d8).
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Figure
1.
Synthesis
and
structure
of
trans-
RuCl2(INpEt)(DPEN) C1. Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond
angles (deg) of C1: Ru1–C1, 1.986(6); Ru1–N4, 2.135(5); Ru1–N3,
2.187(5); Ru1–C12, 2.218(5); Ru1–C11, 2.239(6); Ru1–Cl2,
2.4265(16); Ru1–Cl1, 2.4266(16); C11–C12 1.418(8); C1–Ru1–N3,
177.6(3); N4–Ru1–N3, 78.46(18); Cl2–Ru1–Cl1, 62.53(5); C12–
Ru1–C11, 37.1(2).
Figure
2.
Synthesis
and
structure
of
trans-
Furthermore, we developed a one-pot procedure for the
synthesis of Ru(II)-NHC-diamine complexes (Figure 2).
The direct isolation of the Ru(II)-NHC-diamine species
formed in situ by reacting [Ru(2-methylallyl)2(COD)],
NHC precursor (R,R)-SINpEt∙HBF4, diamine ligand (R,R)-
DPEN and NaOt-Bu in n-hexane was unsuccessful. We ra-
tionalized that the introduction of a chloride ligand might
stabilize the ruthenium complex, thus simplifying the pu-
rification and isolation. After quenching the reaction with
HCl solution (4.0 M in dioxane), ruthenium dichloride C2
and ruthenium mono-chloride C3 were isolated by flash
RuCl2(SINpEt)(DPEN) C2 and RuCl(SINpEt)(DPEN) C3. Sel-
ected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) of C2: Ru1–C1,
1.984(3); Ru1–N4, 2.146(3); Ru1–N3, 2.214(2); Ru1–C12, 2.222(3);
Ru1–C11, 2.229(2); Ru1–Cl2, 2.4205(7); Ru1–Cl1, 2.4211(7); C11–
C12, 1.423(5); C1–Ru1–N4, 103.22(11); C1–Ru1–N3, 172.73(11); N4–
Ru1–N3, 78.58(9); C12–Ru1–C11, 37.30(12); Cl2–Ru1–Cl1,
160.63(2). Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) of
C3: Ru1–C1, 1.953(9); Ru1–C32, 2.061(9); Ru1–N4, 2.153(7); Ru1–
C12, 2.192(8); Ru1–N3, 2.203(7); Ru1–C11, 2.206(7); Ru1–Cl1,
2.549(2); C1–Ru1–C32, 99.3(3); C1–Ru1–N3, 173.8(3); N4–Ru1–
N3, 75.5(3); C32–Ru1–Cl1, 160.0(3).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment