Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Chlorination of Various Alcoholsa
Scheme 3. Competitive Reaction between Tertiary and Primary
Alcohols
tion only at the tertiary site proceeded in the reaction of diol 10 to
give 11. It is noted that one equivalent of hydrosilane is enough
for the selective reaction for diol, while our previous systems
involving reduction1a or alkylation1b require an excess amount of
reagents. Even if the primary OH site reacts with hydrosilane faster
than the tertiary site, silyl transfer finally affords the silyl tertiary
alkoxide, which leads to the tertiary chloride. On the contrary,
conventional chlorination systems such as PPh3/CCl4 or PCl5 gave
the primary chloride 12. Similar selectivity in an intermolecular
version was also observed between 1f and 13. These results show
the unique and interesting selectivity of this chlorination system.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a novel method for
chlorination of alcohols using HSiMe2Cl/benzil/InCl3 system under
neutral conditions. This system can be used for acid-sensitive
substrates. High selectivity for tertiary alcohols over primary alcohol
was observed. Further utility of this novel system is currently under
investigation.
a All entries were carried out at room temperature in CH2Cl2 with 5 mol
% of InCl3. 1.1 equiv of HSiMe2Cl and 1.0 equiv of benzil. b Rearrangement
products (regio isomers) were observed in 23% yield. c dr ) 1:1. d <2%
ee. e 2-Phenylpropane was obtained in 49% yield. f Premixing of HSiMe2Cl
and MeOH (1.0 equiv) followed by the addition of 1r.
The generality of this chlorination methodology is summarized
in Table 2.8 Various secondary and tertiary alcohols were converted
into chlorides in high yields (entries 1-7). The rearranged product
3i was obtained in the reaction with 1i (entry 8). This result supports
the carbocation mechanism in the chlorination. The primary alcohol
1j did not give the desired product (entry 9). However, effective
transformation was observed in the reaction with benzyl alcohols
1k-m which bear electron-withdrawing or -donating substituents
(entries 10-12). Nitro and ester moieties tolerated these reaction
conditions to furnish the corresponding chlorides 3n and 3o in 97%
and 77% yields, respectively (entries 13 and 14). When the optically
pure alcohol 1p was used (entry 15), racemization was observed.
This result also suggests the carbocation mechanism. The reaction
with hydroxyester 1q gave the desired product 3q in high yield
(entry 16). Those good results using acid-sensitive substrates clearly
confirm the advantage of this reaction system. In fact, the reaction
of 1q with PCl3 gave a complicated mixture. The chlorination with
PCl5 gave 3q in lower yield (66%) along with ethyl 3-phenyl-2-
propenoate (5%) through HCl elimination.9 The alcohol 1r did not
give the desired chloride 3s but a reduced product (2-phenylpropane)
in 49% (entry 17). We found that premixing of methanol (1 equiv)
and HSiMe2Cl/benzil/cat. InCl3 followed by the loading of 1r
successfully gave a high yield of 3r (entry 18). It is assumed that
methanol readily reacts with HSiMe2Cl with the generating H2, that
was actually confirmed, and affords the methoxysilane like 8. The
silyl transfer between methoxysilane and the added alcohol gener-
ates the desired alkoxysilane 8. The premixing with methanol avoids
the undesired process releasing HCl.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology of the Japanese Government.
Supporting Information Available: Reaction procedure and
spectroscopic details of new compounds. This material is available free
References
(1) (a) Yasuda, M.; Onishi, Y.; Ueba, M.; Miyai, T.; Baba, A. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 7741-7744. (b) Yasuda, M.; Saito, T.; Ueba, M.; Baba, A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1414-1416.
(2) (a) ComprehensiVe Organic Transformations, 2nd ed.; Larock, R. C., Ed.;
Wiley-VCH: New York, 1999; pp 689-702. (b) Copenhaver, J. E.;
Whaley, A. M. In Organic Syntheses; Wiley and Sons: New York, 1941;
Vol. 1, pp 144-145. (c) Lewis, E. S.; Boozer, C. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1952, 74, 308-311. (d) Hepburn, D. R.; Hudson, H. R. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1976, 754-757. (e) Gomez, L.; Gellibert, F.; Wagner,
A.; Mioskowski, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6049-6052 and references
therein.
(3) During our trial for competitive reaction between alcohols and carbonyls,
we unexpectedly found this interesting outcome.
(4) (a) Onishi, Y.; Ogawa, D.; Yasuda, M.; Baba, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 13690-13691. (b) Onishi, Y.; Ito, T.; Yasuda, M.; Baba, A.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 8227-8235.
(5) Although BiCl3-catalyzed chlorination by chlorosilanes was reported, the
system generates HCl in situ and requires an excess amount of chlorosi-
lanes. Labrouillere, M.; Le Roux, C.; Gaspard-Iloughmane, H.; Dubac, J.
Synlett 1994, 723-724.
(6) Detected by GC (packed with porapak-Q).
(7) The chlorosilyl ether 5 transformed to the chloride 3a (82% yield) in the
presence of InCl3 and benzil (See Supporting Information).
(8) Although Scheme 2 shows that a catalytic amount of benzil could work,
lower yields were, in fact, obtained in the catalytic reactions using alcohols
in Table 2. Much less generation of 6 in catalytic conditions does not
give a practical reaction rate to chlorides.
The methanol method (Table 2, entry 18) including silyl transfer
prompted us to examine the diol which bears both primary and
tertiary hydroxyl sites (Scheme 3). Gratifyingly, selective chlorina-
(9) Even the PPh3/CCl4 system that is considered as a neutral reagent also
gave the lower yield of the product 3r (62%) and the enoate (8%).
JA048688T
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 23, 2004 7187