B. Schmidt et al. / Tetrahedron 63 (2007) 492–496
493
Table 1. Tetrazole formation in different ionic liquids at varying temperatures and stoichiometric ratios
Entry
Substrate or product
NaN3
(equiv)
HOAc
(equiv)
Ionic liquid
T/time
Turnover
(%)
Yield
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
4-Methoxybenzonitrile (1)
4-Methoxybenzonitrile (1)
4-Methoxybenzonitrile (1)
4-Methoxybenzonitrile (1)
4-Methoxybenzonitrile (1)
4-Methoxybenzonitrile (1)
4-Methoxybenzonitrile (1)
4-Methoxybenzonitrile (1)
4-Methoxybenzonitrile (1)
4-Nitrobenzonitrile (2)
4-Nitrobenzonitrile (2)
4-Nitrobenzonitrile (2)
4-Nitrobenzonitrile (2)
2-Pyrazylcarbonitrile (5)
40-Methyl-2-biphenylcarbonitrile (7)
40-Methyl-2-biphenylcarbonitrile (7)
40-Methyl-2-biphenylcarbonitrile (7)
40-methyl-2-biphenylcarbonitrile (7)
40-Methyl-2-biphenylcarbonitrile (7) (10 mmol)
40-Methyl-2-biphenylcarbonitrile (7)
40-Methyl-2-biphenylcarbonitrile (7)
40-Methyl-2-biphenylcarbonitrile (7)
8 (0.75 mmol)
8 (0.75 mmol)
8 (0.75 mmol)
8 (0.75 mmol)
8 (0.75 mmol)
8 (0.75 mmol)
8 (0.75 mmol)
9
7
10
5
11
1.1
1.1
2.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
2
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.7
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.5
0.7
0.2
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
1
[BMIM]Br
[BMIM]Cl
[HMIM]Cl
[OMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Br
[BMIM]Cl
[HMIM]Cl
[OMIM]Cl
[OMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Br
[MMIM]Cl
[HMIM]Cl
[OMIM]Cl
[OMIM]Cl
[MMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Br
[BMIM]Cl
[HMIM]Cl
[OMIM]Cl
[OMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Cl
[OMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Br
[HMIM]Cl
[BMIM]SO3CF3
[HMIM]PF3(C2F5)3
[BMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Cl
[BMIM]Cl
70 ꢀC/38 h
70 ꢀC/38 h
70 ꢀC/38 h
70 ꢀC/38 h
170 ꢀC/24 h
170 ꢀC/24 h
170 ꢀC/24 h
170 ꢀC/24 h
170 ꢀC/24 h
70 ꢀC/72 h
70 ꢀC/72 h
70 ꢀC/72 h
70 ꢀC/72 h
130 ꢀC/48 h
140 ꢀC/48 h
170 ꢀC/48 h
170 ꢀC/48 h
170 ꢀC/48 h
170 ꢀC/48 h
170 ꢀC/24 h
200 W/1 h
62
28
87
79
98
89
95
97
98
97
94
72
97
>95
93
70
62
71
>95
100
85
44
66
17
43
56
76
94
82
91
94
98
91
89
60
89
91
78
12
1
35
71
59
80
18
57
77
73
48
73
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
170 ꢀC/24 h
140 ꢀC/8 h
140 ꢀC/15 h
140 ꢀC/24 h
140 ꢀC/24 h
140 ꢀC/24 h
140 ꢀC/24 h
140 ꢀC/24 h
91
100
100
85
26
0
100
58
100
90
0
170/0.5 h, mw
89a
40a
97a
77a
26a
88a
1
1
1
1
170/0.5 h, mw
170/0.5 h, mw
170/0.5 h, mw
170/0.5 h, mw
170/0.5 h, mw
3
3
3
n.d.
100
8
1
[BMIM]: 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium, [MMIM]: 1-methyl-3-methylimidazolium, [HMIM]: 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium, [OMIM]: 1-octyl-3-methylimid-
azolium. Concn: 0.5 M sample size 1 mL, if not noted otherwise. The turnover was controlled against internal stand, the optimized yields are isolated yields,
mw¼BiotageÒ InitiatorÔ microwave.
a
Crude yields determined by HPLC.
based on N-sulfonamide anions display sufficient vapor
pressure to allow distillation.13 Thus, they were excluded
from our investigation.
for comparison against the established methods from
Amantini and Sharpless.6,7 All compounds were isolated af-
ter aqueous work up, extraction by ethyl acetate or precipi-
tation, where appropriate. The synthesis in IL turned out to
be superior in isolated yield for 13 out of 20 products. Aman-
tini method provided the other seven products, e.g., 9 and 23
(Fig. 1), in better yields. However, this method requires
a hazardous combination of reagents. The Sharpless method
was sometimes even, but generally lacked in isolated yield.
The difficulty in isolation of water soluble products
(clog P<1) was a major cause for the poor yields of the com-
pounds 11, 24–26 (Fig. 1 and Scheme 2). We selected two
advanced intermediates (7+8, Scheme 3) from the synthesis
of sartane drugs2,3 to explore the applicability to functional-
ized substrates. The commercial biphenylnitrile 7 required
an elevated reaction temperature and careful optimization
of the stoichiometry to result in 14 with a yield of 78%. How-
ever, the necessary reaction time was rather long, which re-
sulted in significant byproduct formation, mainly through
product decomposition. However, the tetrazole formation
can be accelerated by microwave heating of DMF solutions.9
The desired rapid heating was reported for [BMIM]PF6. The
standard alkyl-[MIM] based ionic liquids do not feature
dipole moments suitable for rapid microwave heating,
thus the energy absorption is due to ionic conductivity.14,15
Initially, the temperature range had to be optimized to guar-
antee complete conversion within 24 h. This was achieved at
70 ꢀC with electron deficient substrates such as 2, which is
known to react readily during azide formation.6,8 The less
electron deficient pyrazine-2-carbonitrile 5 demanded
a higher temperature (130 ꢀC) and extended reaction time
of 48 h. The electron rich substrates such as 1 and 8 required
even higher reaction temperatures of 170 and 140 ꢀC,
respectively. Extended reaction time or higher reaction
temperatures resulted in decreased yields for all tetrazoles.
This was due to both product and solvent decompositions.
A crucial role was assigned to the amount of acetic acid
added. Large excess of HOAc versus NaN3 drove the volatile
HN3 out of the reaction mixtures and thus created a safety
issue. Equimolar or substoichiometric amount of acetic
acid in relation to sodium azide provided good yields, suffi-
cient reaction rates and economic utilization of NaN3.
The experiments summarized in Figure 1 provided the stan-
dard procedure (140 ꢀC, 0.5 mmol, 24 h in a screw capped
1 mL vial, 3 equiv NaN3, 1 equiv acid in 100 mg IL) in IL