respectively.13 Although the precise role played by the
3 For reviews on this subject, see: (a) A. A. Moroz and M. S. Shvartsberg,
Russ. Chem. Rev., 1974, 43, 679; (b) J. Lindley, Tetrahedron, 1984, 40,
t
4
phosphazene P -Bu base in the outcome of the reaction is not
1
433.
clear at present, two observations may give some clue: (i) the
well-known ability of such a base to form highly nucleophilic
4
5
T. Cohen and I. Cristea, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98, 748.
For a review, see: L. Balas, D. Jhurry, L. Latxague, S. Grelier, Y. Morel,
M. Hamdani, N. Ardoin and D. Astruc, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1990, 127,
‘
naked’ anions and, (ii) the complete solubility that the
t
4
otherwise insoluble CuBr exhibits in the presence of P -Bu .
4
01.
Both factors may facilitate the formation of the reactive
intermediate aryloxycopper species,14 which can then react with
the aryl halide under essentially homogeneous conditions. In
any case, the use of this phosphazene base appears to be critical
for performing the coupling reaction under reaction conditions
that are unsuitable for conventional bases.
This work was financially supported by the Basque Govern-
ment (Project EX-1997-108). A grant from the Basque
Government to R. L. is gratefully acknowledged.
6
For reviews, see: A. V. R. Rao, M. K. Gurjar, K. L. Reddy and A. S. Rao,
Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 2135; J. Zhu, Synlett, 1997, 133.
7 K. Burguess, D. Lim and C. I. Martinez, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,
1996, 35, 1077; K. C. Nicolaou, C. N. C. Boddy, S. Natarajan, T.-Y.
Yuee, H. Li, S. Bräse and J. M. Ramanjulu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
1
19, 3421.
8
For some recent methods, see: G. W. Yeager and D. N. Schissel,
Synthesis, 1991, 63; K. Smith and D. Jones, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1
5
, 1992, 407; E. A. Schmittling and J. S. Sawyer, J. Org. Chem., 1993,
8, 3229; M. E. Jung and L. S. Starkey, Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 8815;
D. M. T. Chan, K. L. Monaco, R.-P. Wang and M. P. Winters
Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 2933; D. A. Evans, J. L. Katz and T. R.
West, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 2937.
Notes and References
†
‡
E-mail: goppanic@sc.ehu.es
General procedure: A mixture of the aryl halide (1 mmol), the
9 J.-F. Marcoux, S. Doye and S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 10 539.
10 For a definition of this concept, see for example: L. F. Lindoy, The
Chemistry of Macrocyclic Ligand Complexes, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 1989, p. 107.
11 R. Schwesinger, Chimia, 1985, 39, 269; R. Schwesinger, Nachr. Chem.
Tech. Lab., 1990, 38, 1214; R. Schwesinger, in Encyclopedia of
Reagents for Organic Synthesis, ed. L. Paquette, Wiley, New York,
1995, vol. 6, p. 4110.
t
4
corresponding phenol (2 mmol), P -Bu (2 mmol) and CuBr (2 mmol or 0.2
mmol for the catalytic version) in dry, deoxygenated toluene or dioxane (3
ml) was refluxed under a nitrogen atmosphere until the aryl halide was
consumed as determined by GC analysis (typically 16–20 h). The reaction
mixture was then allowed to cool to room temperature, diluted with EtOAc
and washed sequentially with saturated aq. NH
ml) and water (25 ml). The organic layer was dried over Na
4
Cl (25 ml), 0.1
M
NaOH (25
SO and
2
4
concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel
using hexane afforded the analytically pure product.
12 R. Schwesinger, H. Schlemper, C. Hasenfratz, J. Willaredt, T.
Dambacher, T. Breuer, C. Ottaway, M. Fletschinger, J. Boele, H. Fritz,
D. Putzas, H. W. Rotter, F. G. Bordwell, A. V. Satish, G.-Z. Ji, E.-M.
Peters, K. Peters, H. Georg von Schnering and L. Walz, Liebigs Ann.,
1996, 1055.
§
2
1
2 3 2 3
Among the bases tested, Na CO , K CO and 3,3,6,9,9-pentamethyl-
,10-diazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-1-ene (PMDBD) were completely uneffective;
,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) and 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]-
dec-5-ene (TBD) afforded the coupling product in less than 20% yield along
with the starting material and unidentified side products.
13 For recent methods for the synthesis of biaryl amines, see: J. F. Hartwig,
Synthesis, 1997, 329.
1
4 For mechanistic considerations, see: H. L. Aalten, G. van Koten, D. M.
Grove, T. Kuilman, O. G. Piekstra, L. A. Hulshof and R. A. Sheldon,
Tetrahedron, 1989, 45, 5565; Also, see refs. 2 and 3(b).
1
2
F. Ullmann, Chem. Ber., 1904, 37, 853.
T. Cohen, J. Wood and A. G. Dietz, Jr., Tetrahedron Lett., 1974,
3555.
Received in Liverpool, UK, 23rd July 1998; 8/05783D
2092
Chem. Commun., 1998