2
M. Mellado et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1217 (2020) 128430
Fig. 1. Hydrazones used to detect and measure Cu(II), with the Schiff base bond highlighted in red.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of cinnamaldehyde phenylhydrazone (3).
1). Its photophysical properties (UVeVis and fluorescence) were
evaluated in the absence and presence of inorganic (metal) salts, as
well as the determination of thermodynamic constants associated
2.3. Synthesis of cinnamaldehyde phenylhydrazone (3)
In a 250-mL three-neck round-bottomed flask, cinnamaldehyde
(1, 500 mg, 3.79 mmol) was dissolved in 2-propanol (50 mL), and
phenylhydrazine (2, 409 mg, 3.79 mmol) was added. The mixture
was stirred at reflux for 8 h. After this time, distilled water was
added to finish the reaction. The reaction mixture was extracted
with dichloromethane (3 ꢀ 30 mL), and the organic layer was dried
and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting mixture
was separated using a flash chromatography column with a hex-
ane:ethyl acetate mixture with increasing polarity as the mobile
phase. Finally, a pale yellow solid (3, 676 mg, 3.07 mmol) was ob-
with the inorganic metal-hydrazone interaction (DG, DH, and DS).
Additionally, the main chemical properties that influence the
metal-hydrazone interaction were identified by density functional
theory (DFT) calculations and with the application of multivariable
analysis. Finally, the potential application of cinnamaldehyde
phenylhydrazone (3) in the determination of Cu2þ in water samples
was evaluated.
tained as a pure compound (81% yield); MP: 161.6
1 y,
ꢁC, IR (
2. Experimental
cmꢂ1): 3441 (s, ¼NeH), 3313 (s, C]H), 1601 (s, CH Ar), 1560 (m, CH
Ar), 1517 (s, CH Ar), 1486 (w, CH Ar), 1259 (s, HeCeN), 1135(s,
2.1. Instrumentation
HeCeN); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
d
7.55 (1H, d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-3a),
7.45 (2H, d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-2 þ H-6), 7.35 (2H, m, H-3’þH-50),
7.29e7.24 (3H, m, H-3 þ H-5 þ H-2a),7.06e6.99 (3H, m, H-4þ H-
2’þH-60), 6.87 (1H, m, H-40), 6.69 (1H, d, J ¼ 16.0 Hz, H-1a); 13C NMR
The melting point was measured using a Stuart Scientific
Melting Point SMP3 (Staffordshire, UK). Infrared spectra were
recorded using aJasco FT-IR 4600 (Tokyo, Japan). 1H NMR
(400.13 MHz), 13C NMR (100.6 MHz), 2D-HSQC and 2D-HMBC
spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 Digital NMR spec-
trometer (Berlin, Germany). Tetramethylsilane was used as an in-
ternal standard. GC-MS was carried out using an Agilent
Technologies 6890 model (Santa Clara, CA, USA) with an automatic
ALS and an HP MD 5973 mass detector in splitless mode. Mea-
surement of pH was performed using a Bante Instruments Bench-
top PHS-25cw microprocessor pH/mV meter (Shanghai, China).
Absorption spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-mini-1240
UVeVis spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan). All steady-state fluo-
rescence measurements were performed on an ISS K2 Multifre-
quency Phase Fluorometer (Champaign, IL, USA).
(400 MHz, CDCl3):
d
144.2 (C-10), 139.8 (CH-1a), 136.7 (C-1), 134.1
(CH-3a), 129.3 (2xCH, CH-5’ þ CH-30), 128.7 (2xCH, CH-3 þ CH-5),
128.0 (CH-4), 126.5 (2xCH, CH-2 þ CH-6), 125.9 (CH-2a), 120.2 (CH-
40), 112.7 (2xCH, CH-2’ þ CH-6’). MS-EI: 222 [Mþ] (100%). All
spectroscopic analyses are consistent with a previous report [1].
2.4. Evaluation of fluorescence spectroscopy parameters
Fluorescence excitation and emission spectra were obtained
using a xenon arc lamp as a light source. Fluorescence spectra were
measured at 90ꢁ in an L-format using single photon counting mode.
Data were acquired and analysed by Vinci™ software.
The relative quantum yield (
F) was determined using quinine-
sulfate as a standard (0.1 M H2SO4 at 22 ꢁC,
Fs ¼ 0.58, lex ¼ 350 nm)
[33]. Equation (1) was used to calculate the quantum yield [34].
2.2. Chemicals
Fu As n2
Fs Au
Cinnamaldehyde (1), phenylhydrazine (2), dimethylsulfoxide
(DMSO), heptane (C7H16), tetrahydrofuran (THF), acetone (Me2CO),
dimethylformamide (DMF), methanol (MeOH), HEPES sodium salt
HCl, NaOH, LiCl, NaCl, MgCl2 x 6H2O, CaCl2 x 2H2O, SrCl2 x 6H2O,
F
¼
x
x
u xFs
(Eq. 1)
ns2
where the subscripts u and s indicate the test and standard,
respectively. is the quantum yield, A is the absorbance at the
F
BaCl2 x 2H2O, AlCl3, SnCl2 x 2H2O, BiCl3, CrCl3 x 6H2O, MnCl2
x
excitation wavelength, F is the integrated emission spectrum, and n
is the refractive index of the solvent.
4H2O, FeCl3 x 6H2O, CoCl2 x 6H2O, NiCl2 x 6H2O, CuCl2 x 2H2O, CuCl,
ZnCl2, CdCl2 x 2 1/2H2O, HgCl2, Pb(NO3)2, AgNO3 and ethylenedi-
amine tetrasodic salt (EDTA), were purchased from Merck (Darm-
stadt, Germany). 2-Propanol, hexane, dichloromethane (CH2Cl2),
ethyl acetate and acetonitrile (MeCN) were purchased from J.T.
Baker (Radnor, PA, USA).
2.5. Evaluation of figures of merit
The values of the limit of detection and limit of quantification