286
S.-Y. Liu et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 311 (2000) 283–287
orientation, film geometry, and grain size, etc., will also
influence the absorption rate. In this study, the surface
reaction constant in light water was similar to that for
heavy water at 21.2 V. At higher applied potentials, the
increase in k in heavy water became faster in light water. It
implies that the absorption rate of deuterium in Pd
nanofilm was faster than that of hydrogen.
In classical theory, the diffusivity ratio of hydrogen to
deuterium in most metals is Œ2] . It has been frequently
observed, however, that reversed isotope dependence is
associated with Pd over a broad temperature range from
260 to 2008C [8,26,27]. This inversion has been attributed
to a larger activation energy for hydrogen diffusion [8,28].
In the present study, the surface reaction for deuterium also
appeared to be faster than for hydrogen. The reason for the
absorption rates or higher surface constants for deuterium
requires further study.
Fig. 5. Hydrogen concentration profiles during absorption in
nanofilm. C0 is the initial surface concentration.
a Pd
finish the occlusion so that the surface effect can be
ignored. For a nanofilm, however, the thickness of the film
is small enough, either the surface barrier or repulsion
from the occluded hydrogen in the sublayer could be the
rate-limiting step of hydrogen absorption into the nanofilm.
Therefore, the diffusion time within the film can be
neglected, thus, the concentration profile is treated as a
constant value, as shown in Fig. 5. The repulsion from the
occluded hydrogen in the sublayer involves the stress
induced by lattice expansion, release of reaction heat, and
repulsive force between hydrogen atoms.
The influence of surface barrier and repulsion from the
occluded hydrogen is not included in Eqs. (7) and (8). If
both of them are considered, the average concentration in
the film can be assumed to increase exponentially until the
saturation is reached, which is described as:
4. Conclusion
The kinetics of hydrogen/deuterium absorption in a
nano-scaled Pd film has been studied by means of EQCM.
The surface effect was considered to be the dominant
factor in delaying the hydrogen/deuterium absorption rate
in the Pd nanofilm. The absorption kinetics models for
thick and nanoscaled Pd films are proposed to interpret the
hydrogen/deuterium absorption behavior without and with
the surface effect, respectively. A first-order reaction is
proposed to interpret the surface-controlled absorption in
the nanoscaled Pd film. The surface reaction constants are
obtained for different applied voltages and electrolytes.
The absorption rates as well as the surface reaction
constants of deuterium were larger than those of hydrogen.
dC(t)
]
5 k(C0 2 C(t))
(9)
dt
or
C(t) 1 C0(1 2 e2kt
Acknowledgements
)
(10)
This work was supported by the National Science
Council of ROC under Contract Nos. NSC 88-2216-E-007-
048 and NSC 87-TPC-M-002-001.
where k (unit: s21) stands for the surface reaction constant
and C0 is the surface concentration (which is also the
saturation concentration in the Pd film).
If the surface reaction is the rate-determining step for
hydrogen absorption, the diffusion term in the nanofilm
can be neglected, the kinetics curves can be fitted with Eq.
(10) by adjusting the values of surface reaction constant.
For example, in Fig. 2, neglecting the stress effect and if
the saturation concentration is substituted with the terminal
frequency shift 2415 Hz for 21.3 V, k is calculated to be
0.16. The fitted curves for hydrogen and deuterium absorp-
tion along with the calculated surface reaction constants
are also shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. It is noted
that k increases with the applied potential. In effect, k is
affected by not only the applied potential but also other
factors such as electrolyte, composition, ambient tempera-
ture, or applied stress. The surface roughness, grain
References
[1] V.M. Gryaznov, Platinum Met. Rev. 36 (1992) 70.
[2] M.J. Cole, Platinum Met. Rev. 12 (1981) 25.
[3] F.A. Lewis, X.Q. Tong, R.V. Bucur, Platinum Met. Rev. 35 (1991)
138.
[4] Y.K. Cho, K. Han, K.H. Lee, J. Membrane Sci. 140 (1995) 219.
[5] V.I. Anisimkin, I.M. Kotelyanskii, P. Verardi, E. Verona, Sensors and
Actuators B 23 (1995) 203.
[6] R.C. Thomas, R.C. Hughes, J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 (1997) 3245.
[7] F.A. Lewis, The Palladium Hydrogen System, Academic Press, New
York, 1967.
¨
[8] J. Volkl, G. Wollenweber, K.H. Klatt, G. Alefeld, Z. Naturforsch 26
(1971) 922.