4878 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 112, No. 22, 2008
Letters
pulsed ultrasound for the luminol solution prepared similarly
to that in Figure 3. SCL was detected using a photomultiplier
sensor (Hamamatsu Photonics, H7732-10), and the waveform
was observed using a digital oscilloscope. The time-averaged
intensity of SCL was compared between Figure 5a-c. A
magnitude of intensity in the order of (a) > (b) > (c) was
obtained. This is consistent with the order of magnitude found
for the SE ratio shown in Figure 2. The inset of Figure 5a (100
cycle ON-100 cycle OFF) shows that the SCL intensity has a
long tail relative to the pulse-off time. This is attributed to the
sound pressure amplitude that barely reaches zero during the
rest time, as seen in Figure 4a. In Figure 5b (1000 cycle
ON-1000 cycle OFF) and Figure 5c (10000 cycle ON-10000
cycle OFF), the intensity decays and reaches zero during the
rest time, according to the pressure variation shown in Figure
4b,c. Dekerckheer et al.20 studied SCL pulses at different pulse-
lengths and on/off pulse ratios, and results of SCL pulse similar
to those shown in Figure 5 were reported. Ashokkumar et al.21
showed that a sonoluminescence pulse different from that of
SCL develops, and the intensity plateaus with a pulse length
corresponding to the change in the waveform of the pressure
amplitude. However, so far, a mechanism for the enhancement
of SE by pulsed ultrasound has not been identified from both
the measured pressure amplitude and the SCL pulse. The present
results may be evidence that the population of sonochemically
active bubbles is closely related with the residual acoustic
pressure. The residual pressure amplitude maintains a certain
number of pulsating bubbles due to the suppression of dissolution.
Thus, high SE by pulsed ultrasound, compared with that by
CW ultrasound, is attributed both to the residual pressure
amplitude during the pulse-off time and to the spatial enlarge-
ment of active reaction sites. The effect of spatial enlargement
is also obtained using a partially degassed solution, even under
CW ultrasound. The authors have previously studied the
sonochemical oxidation of potassium iodide at different dis-
solved-gas concentrations22 and showed that the relative SE at
intermediate concentrations is at most 2 times higher compared
with that at saturation, and the oxidation could not be observed
for a completely degassed solution. Accordingly, it is proposed
that the effect of residual pressure amplitude is superior to that
of spatial enlargement.
Acknowledgment. Part of this study was supported by
funding from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology of Japan.
References and Notes
(1) Leighton, T. G. The Acoustic Bubble; Academic: London, 1996.
(2) Suslick, K. S. Science 1990, 247, 1439.
(3) Yasui, K.; Tuziuti, T.; Sivakumar, M.; Iida, Y. J. Chem. Phys. 2005,
122, 224706.
(4) Walton, A. J.; Reynolds, G. T. AdV. Phys. 1984, 33, 595.
(5) Mason, T. J. Sonochemistry; Oxford University Press: New York,
1999.
(6) Suslick, K. S.; Price, G. J. Annu. ReV. Mater. Sci. 1999, 29, 295.
(7) Beckett, M. A.; Hua, I. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 3796.
(8) Gogate, P. R.; Mujumdar, S.; Pandit, A. B. AdV. EnViron. Res. 2003,
7, 283.
(9) Miyoshi, N.; Tuziuti, T.; Yasui, K.; Iida, Y.; Shimizu, N.; Riesz,
P.; Sostaric, J. Z. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2008, 15, 881.
(10) Flynn, H. G.; Church, C. C. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1984, 76, 505.
(11) Casadonte, D. J.; Flores, M.; Pe´trier, C. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2005,
12, 147.
(12) Henglein, A.; Ulrich, R.; Lilie, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111,
1974.
(13) Koda, S.; Kimura, T.; Kondo, T.; Mitome, H. Ultrason. Sonochem.
2003, 10, 149.
(14) Rahn, R. O.; Xu, P.; Miller, S. L. Photochem. Photobiol. 1999,
70, 314.
(15) Asakura, Y.; Nishida, T.; Matsuoka, T.; Koda, S. Ultrason.
Sonochem. 2008, 15, 244.
(16) Kojima, Y.; Koda, S.; Nomura, H. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 37,
2992.
(17) Henglein, A. Ultrasonics 1987, 25, 6.
(18) Pe´trier, C.; Lamy, M-F.; Francony, A.; Benahcene, A.; David, B.;
Renaudin, V.; Gondrexon, N. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 10514.
(19) Lee, J.; Ashokkumar, M.; Kentish, S.; Grieser, F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 16810.
(20) Dekerckheer, C.; Bartik, K.; Lecomte, J-P.; Reisse, J. J. Phys. Chem.
A 1998, 102, 9177.
(21) Ashokkumar, M.; Hall, R.; Mulvaney, P.; Grieser, F. J. Phys. Chem.
B 1997, 101, 10845.
(22) Tuziuti, T.; Yasui, K.; Iida, Y.; Sivakumar, M.; Koda, S. J. Phys.
Chem. A 2004, 108, 9011.
JP802640X