S. Palaniandy, N.H. Jamil / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 476 (2009) 894–902
895
Table 1
Operational parameters of planetary mill.
Mill rotational speed (rpm)
Milling time (h)
200
1
400
2
600
5
because of its several advantages to downstream processes like
reducing the annealing and sintering temperature, reducing the
phase transformation temperature, enhancing the leaching pro-
cess, decreasing the thermal decomposition temperature, and
increasing the particle reactivity [19,20].
The mechanochemical synthesis process is carried out in high-
intensity grinding mills such as vibro mills, planetary mills, and
oscillating mills. It has been noticed that the size reduction process
Fig. 1. Schematic of the planetary mill.
diameter. When these parameters are fixed, the planetary mill can be characterized
by the ratio of the diameter mill axis rotation (G) to the diameter of the mill (D).
Let R be the ratio of the rotation speed of the mill axis to the rotation speed of the
mill at its center. The negative R value indicates that the mill and the shaft rotate in
opposite directions. The dynamics of the planetary mill allows the computation of
critical speed. The percent of the critical speed is shown in Eqs. (1) and (2).
and the microstructural evolution of the CaTiO during milling pro-
3
cess were mainly influenced by the type of impulsive stress applied
by the grinding media, which can either be an impact or shear type.
Moreover, other parameters such as atmosphere composition and
the presence of different liquid media inside the grinding mill affect
the mechanochemical process. In fact, when the mechanochemical
synthesis of the CaCO3 and TiO2 was carried out in planetary mills
N2
%
CS =
(1)
(2)
R × N1
ꢀ
G
D
R = −1 ±
where N1 is the gyrating speed and N2 is the jar speed. In this work, the mill was
operated at 78.5% critical speed. This was accomplished by doing the following
at higher rotational speed to produce CaTiO , the impact stress was
3
dominant, and not much attention was given on the mechanochem-
ical mechanism itself.
The aim of this work, therefore, is to give additional contribu-
tion in understanding the influence of milling conditions on the
calculation of Eq. (3):
ꢀ
1
7
3
R = −1 ±
= −1 ± 1.36
(3)
Taking the minus sign for the opposite direction of motion between the jar and
the main shaft, it can be shown that R = −2.36.
mechanochemical synthesis of CaTiO nanoparticles without of the
3
deleterious phase.
The percent of critical speed is calculated by considering the shaft speed and jar
speed as 600 and 1092 rpm. Therefore the critical speed calculated is shown in Eq.
2. Experimental
(
4).
2
.1. Raw materials and milling conditions
1092
.36 × 600
%
CS = 2
× 100 = 78.5%
(4)
The CaTiO3 powder was synthesized through a mechanochemical route. To start,
Calcite CaCO3 (99.9% purity, Aldrich) and rutile TiO2 (99.9% purity, BDH laboratory
supply) were mixed in a stiochiometric ratio of 1:1 in an agate mortar with a pestle
for 10 min and were preserved in desiccators. Then the mixture was subjected to
microwave heating using a normal kitchen microwave oven for 2 min to remove the
moisture in the samples. The milling of the mixture was conducted under atmo-
spheric condition in a planetary ball mill (Fritsch Pulveristte-6) with one steel pot
of 50 cm3 inner volume. The milling was performed by varying the mill rotational
speed and the milling time at three levels, as shown in Table 1.
2.3. Characterization
The specific surface area of the powders was determined by a multipoint nitro-
gen adsorption using a Quantachrome system and the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller
method (BET). The amount of N2 adsorbed at liquid nitrogen temperature was
measured in N2/He carrier flux in a concentration range of 10–30%.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed on a D8 Diffractometer (Bruker
AXS) using Cu K radiation for all analyses at 40 kV and 20 mA in order to identify the
compositional and phase changes in the mixture during the grinding operation. The
XRD patterns were recorded in the 2Â range = 10–70 using a step size of 0.05 and a
counting time of 5 s per step. Silicon powder was used as standard agent to remove
the instrumental broadening effects from the observed profile broadening.
Line positions, intensified widths, and shapes were obtained from the XRD spec-
tra in order to characterize the microstructure in terms of defects parameters such as
crystalline size and microstrain. The APD version 4.1 g software was used to acquire
these parameters [21]. The K␣2 component was removed from the XRD spectra with
the assumption that K␣2 intensity was half of K␣1 intensity. Then the [1 0 1] and
[1 0 0] planes were selected for the profile analysis of TiO2 and CaCO3. The over-
lapped peak was split using the APD version 4.1 g software. The X-ray diffraction
patterns were adjusted to a combination of Cauchy and Gaussian line shapes using
the Halder and Wagner method for obtaining physical broadening, as shown in Eq.
◦
◦
2.2. Planetary mill mechanics
The planetary ball mill consisted of a gyratory shaft and a cylindrical jar, and both
were rotated simultaneously in opposite directions at high rotational speed. Such
movement at high speed allowed the ball to move strongly and rigorously, which
led to a large impact energy between the balls and the materials. The specification
of the planetary mill used in this work is shown in Table 2.
Fig. 1 shows the schematic of the planetary ball mill where a jar rotates at about
a primary axis O. Here, G is the diameter of the axis of the jar, and D is the mill
Table 2
Dimensions of the Planetary mill.
(
5), where ˇf, ˇh and ˇg are the integral breadths of the instrumental, observed, and
measured profiles. The profile fitting procedure was performed without smooth-
ing the XRD spectra. Each goodness factor was refined to a value of <5% for all the
reflections. The maximum height of the peak (Imax), integral breath of the line pro-
file (ˇ = A/Imax), full-width at half maximum (FWHM), and peak position (2Â) were
obtained from the adjusted line profile. A is the area under the peak. The apparent
crystallite size was calculated using the Scherrer formula, as shown in Eq. (6). The
Scherrer formula, meanwhile, describes the mutual dependence between the line
profile integral breath and crystallite size Dv which was the volume weighted mean
of the crystallite in the direction perpendicular to the diffracting planes; the constant
varied with the reflection Bragg angle and crystallite shape. Lattice strain was calcu-
lated using Eq. (7). The structural disorder due to the increasing abundance of X-ray
amorphous material was manifested through the reduction in the integral inten-
sity of the diffraction lines [21]. The relative degree of crystallinity (DOC) defined in
Eq. (8) was based on the area under the [1 0 1] and [1 0 0] peak for TiO2 and CaCO3,
where A0 and A were the areas under the peak for feed and ground sample [22].
Working principle
Grinding process
Transmission ratio
Impact (mainly)
Dry
Irelative = 1:-1.82 (mill and shaft
rotate in the opposite
directions)
Mill
Material
Diameter, mm
Volume, mm3
Rotational speed, rpm
Stainless steel
70
250
200, 400 and 600
Grinding balls
Material
Diameter, mm
Density, kg/m3
Weight, kg
Stainless steel
10
7800
0.2
66
2
2
(ˇ − ˇ )
h
g
ˇf =
(5)
Filling, % of mill volume
ˇh