[
Z.-Y. Wu et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 24 (2013) 359–361
I
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1 and 2.
7.15 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 4.17 (t, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 3.31 (t, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz),
3.04 (s, 3H), 1.71 (m, 4H), 1.45 (m, 2H), 1.35 (m, 2H), 0.97 (t, 3H,
J = 8.0 Hz), 0.93 (t, 3H, J = 8.0 Hz); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3):
d
164.61, 164.09, 156.85, 132.41, 130.96, 130.83, 130.19, 125.95,
124.95, 123.18, 115.26, 114.58, 56.83, 41.60, 40.02, 30.28, 29.58,
20.42, 20.23, 13.89, 13.87; GC-MS (EI+), Calcd. for C21H26N2O2 [M+]
338.1994; found 338.2003.
Fig. 2. The change of the fluorescence efficiency of 1 and 2 as a function of ET(30).
The longest emission wavelength of 1 appears between 467 nm
and 546 nm. Increasing polarity of solvent from hexane to ethanol
leads to a bathochromic shift of about 70 nm of the emission
maximum of 1 (Fig. 1). This value is greater than that of the
absorption maximum which confirmed the formation of an
internal charge transfer (ICT) excited state. The emission maxi-
mum of 2 shows the same trend as that of 1, except that it is about
10 nm shorter in a given solvent (except in hexane). Their similar
emission maximums indicate that the emitting state of 1 and 2 is
similar in structure. Regarding to their long emission wavelengths,
the 4-amino group may be parallel to the naphthalimide ring on
the emitting state. The relatively longer emission wavelengths of 1
than that of 2 can be attributed to the inductive effect of the methyl
substituent which increases the electron donating ability of the 4-
amino group. As shown in Fig. 1, the emission maximum of both 1
and 2 exhibits a good linear relationship with ET(30).
3. Results and discussion
The photo-physical properties of 1 and 2 in solvents with
different polarity were investigated and the spectra data are
collected in Table S1 (Supplementary data). The longest wave-
length absorption of 1 appears at 391–443 nm with an extinction
coefficient in the range of 10,000–15,000 L molꢁ1 cmꢁ1. Increasing
polarity of solvent described by an empirical parameter ET(30) [13]
leads to a bathochromic shift of the absorption maximum (Fig. 1).
Changing the solvent from hexane to ethanol results in a red-shift
of the absorption maximum of about 30 nm. These observations
suggest that the maximum absorption of 1 arises from a charge
transfer (CT) transition [4] and that the ground state of 1 is
significantly polar. The absorption spectra of 2 show similar
dependence on solvent polarity. But, the maximum absorption of 2
is 10–20 nm longer than that of 1 in a given solvent. The molar
extinction coefficient of 2 (16,000–24,000 L molꢁ1 cmꢁ1) is also
greater than that of 1. This difference can be attributed to the steric
interaction between the methyl group of the 4-amino substituent
and the hydrogen atom at the 5-position (the peri effect), which
makes the 4-amino group of 1 less planarity with the naphtha-
limide ring [4]. This effect inhibits the CT from the 4-amino group
to the naphthalimide ring and destabilizes the Franck–Condon
excited state of 1.
Although the emission wavelengths of 1 and 2 are similar, their
fluorescence efficiencies are quite different. Both the fluorescence
efficiencies of 1 and 2 are higher in nonpolar solvents and decrease
with increasing the solvent polarity. But the fluorescence efficiency
of 1 decreases more steeply than that of 2 (Fig. 2). In polar solvents
such as ethanol, the fluorescence of 1 is almost fully quenched
(
(
F
F = 0.008), while the fluorescence efficiency of 2 remains high
FF = 0.62). It is obvious that there is an additional nonradiative
pathway of the excited state of 1. We attribute it to the formation
of a twisted internal charge transfer (TICT) state where the 4-
amino group is orthogonal to the naphthalimide ring and the
positive and negative charges are fully separated (Scheme 2) [14].
The formation of this TICT state may be facilitated by the steric
interaction between the peri H atom and the methyl group of the 4-
amino substituent. Therefore, the charge separation of the TICT
state is more complete than that of the ICT state. Increasing solvent
polarity increases the probability of the formation of the TICT state,
which leads to the sharp decrease of the fluorescence efficiency of
[(Schem2)_TD$FI]G
[(Fig._1)TD$FIG]
Fig. 1. The change of the absorption maximum of 1 (lab(1)) and 2 (lab(2)) and the
emission maximum of 1 ( em(1)) and 2 ( em(2)) as a function of ET(30). The straight
l
l
lines are the linear fitness of the emission maximum of 1 (solid) and 2 (dash) to
ET(30). The correlation coefficient is 0.947 (solid) and 0.981 (dash), respectively.
Scheme 2. The proposed mechanism of the formation of the TICT state of 1.