6
Journal of Chemical Research 00(0)
method. The reduction-catalytic activity of the Ag@AgCl/ ESCALAB 250 spectrometer with monochromatic Al Kα as
a-Cu composites was studied in the reduction of 4-NP in the excitation source. The UV-Vis spectra were recorded on
aqueous NaBH4 solution, and 95.1% of 4-NP was reduced a UH4150 (Hitachi) UV-Vis spectrophotometer.
to 4-AP in 120s by fresh Ag@AgCl/a-Cu composite cata-
lyst. The high-performance catalytic efficiency and reusa-
bility of Ag@AgCl/a-Cu can be attributed to the synergistic
Reduction of 4-NP
effect between Ag@AgC and amorphous metal elements.
This research may provide an effective reference for the
preparation of high-performance composite catalysts using
amorphous metals as supports.
The reduction of 4-NP was performed in a glass flask in the
presence of the different catalysts (a-Cu, Ag@AgCl, and
Ag@AgCl/a-Cu) and aqueous NaBH4 solution under con-
stant stirring. In a typical procedure, first, 4-NP (20mL,
0.10mM) aqueous solution was purged with N2 to remove
dissolved oxygen in the aqueous solution, and then freshly
prepared NaBH4 (5mL, 20mM) were added. At this time,
the colorless and transparent aqueous solution turned pale
yellow. So, 4-NP showed a characteristic absorption peak at
317nm in a neutral or acidic medium but after adding
NaBH4, the 4-nitrophenolate ion was formed, and the
absorption peak shifted to 400nm. After the addition of the
catalyst, the characteristic peak at 400nm decreased with
time and a new peak appeared at 300nm. The solution was
stirred during the reaction, and the supernatant was trans-
ferred to a quartz cuvette for UV-Vis spectrum measure-
ments. The decrease in the 400nm characteristic absorption
peak indicated a decrease in the amount of 4-NP.
Experimental section
Materials and reagents
Copper chloride dehydrate (CuCl2·2H2O, AR, 99%), tan-
nic acid (TA, 99%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, AR, 96%),
sodium borohydride (NaBH4, AR, 99%), silver nitrate
(AgNO3, AR, 99%), and 4-nitrophenol (4-NP, AR, 99%)
were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co.,
LTD. All reagents were used without further purification
and distilled water with a resistance of 18.2MΩ was used
throughout the experiments.
Synthesis of amorphous Cu (a-Cu) support
Declaration of conflicting interests
CuCl2·2H2O (0.2g) and TA (0.08g) were added to deion-
ized water (38mL) and were completely dissolved by ultra-
sonic treatment and stirring. Next of NaOH (2.0mL, 1M)
was added dropwise to the above solution during stirring
for 10min, and the solution was then stirred for a further
15min again. The product was collected by centrifugation,
washed with water and ethanol several times, and then
dried under vacuum overnight. All the operations described
above were performed at room temperature.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with
respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this
article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support
for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article:
This work was financially supported by West Anhui University
(WGKQ201702022, WXBSH2019004, 201910376003), Anhui
Provincial Education Department (gxgnfx2019029), and Anhui
Provincial Natural Science Foundation (1808085QH233, 18080
85QB33).
Synthesis of the composite catalyst
CuCl2·2H2O (0.2g) and TA (0.08g) were added to deion-
ized water (38mL), and were completely dissolved by soni-
cation and stirring. Next, during stirring, NaOH (2.0mL,
1M) was added dropwise to the above solution for 10min,
and after stirring the solution for 15min, AgNO3 (0.2g) was
added, and stirring was continued for 30min. The product
was collected by centrifugation, washed several times with
water and ethanol, and then dried under vacuum overnight.
The resulting powder was irradiated under an ultraviolet
lamp for 60min to ensure that Ag+ was partly reduced to
Ag0 to give Ag@AgCl/a-Cu composite catalyst as a gray
powder. The Ag@AgCl composite catalyst was synthe-
sized by a similar method.
ORCID iD
Hequn Hao
References
1. Afedz TW, Kwon E, Tuan DD, et al. Sci Total Environ 2020;
703: 134781.
2. Ayodhya D and Veerabhadram G. Flat Chem 2019; 14:
100088.
3. Kang X, Teng D, Wu S, et al. J Colloid Interf Sci 2020; 566:
265.
4. Sun X, He P, Gao Z, et al. J Colloid Interf Sci 2019; 553: 1.
5. He L, Tong Z, Wang Z, et al. J Colloid Interf Sci 2018; 509:
448.
6. Peng X, Cao J, Xie B, et al. Ecotox Environ Safe 2020; 188:
109869.
Characterization
7. Karaoğlan GK, Gümrükçü G, Koca A, et al. Dyes Pigm
2011; 90: 11.
The XRD patterns were recorded on the D8 advance
Diffractometer(Bruker)equippedwithCuKα(λ=1.54056Å)
radiation (40kV, 40mA). TEM analysis was carried out by
transmission electron microscopy (2010-Plus, JEOL) at an
accelerating voltage of 200kV. X-ray photoelectron spec-
troscopy (XPS) was carried out using a ThermoScientific
8. Zheng Y, Shu J and Wang Z. Mater Lett 2015; 158: 339.
9. Sun L, He J, An S, et al. Chinese J Catal 2013; 34: 1378.
10. Lin FH and Doong RA. J Phys Chem C 2011; 115: 6591.
11. Zou Y, Huang H, Li S, et al. J Photoch Photobio A 2019;
376: 43.