Correction: Exploiting and understanding the selectivity of Ru-N-heterocyclic carbene metathesis catalysts for the ethenolysis of cyclic olefins to α,ω-Dienes (Journal of the American Chemical Society (2017) 139:37 (13117-13125) DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b06947)

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/jacs.8b12730

The isotropic chemical shielding (iso) was mislabeled as the isotropic chemical shift (iso) in Table S40, Figures 2, 4, S153 and in the respective discussion of these figures in the text. The corrected figures are shown below; the SI graphics are provided in the corrected SI file. In the conclusion section, "cyclic olefins" was incorrectly written as "cyclic dienes" to be the essential structural feature for the selective ethenolysis toward w-dienes. The ROMP activity of Ru-20 is not detectable in the "presence of ethylene"; this was incorrectly written as the "absence of ethylene". Equations 5 and 7, pages S47 and S135 respectively, had errors that have been fixed in the corrected SI file. None of the above affects any conclusions of the article. (Figure Presented).

Full text of DOI:10.1021/jacs.8b12730

Addition/Correction
pubs.acs.org/JACS
Cite This: J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX
Correction to “Exploiting and Understanding the Selectivity of Ru-N-
Heterocyclic Carbene Metathesis Catalysts for the Ethenolysis of
Cyclic Olefins to α,ω-Dienes”
Pascal S. Engl, Celine B. Santiago, Christopher P. Gordon, Wei-Chih Liao, Alexey Fedorov,*
́
Christophe Coperet,* Matthew S. Sigman,* and Antonio Togni*
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (37), 13117−13125, DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b06947.
S
* Supporting Information
The isotropic chemical shielding (σiso) was mislabeled as the
isotropic chemical shift (δiso) in Table S40, Figures 2, 4, S153
and in the respective discussion of these figures in the text. The
corrected figures are shown below; the SI graphics are provided
in the corrected SI file.
Figure 4. Multivariate models of predicted selectivity vs measured
selectivity for ethenolysis product 2 at t = 180 min for ruthenium
complexes Ru-1−21.
In the conclusion section, “cyclic olefins” was incorrectly
written as “cyclic dienes” to be the essential structural feature for
the selective ethenolysis toward α,ω-dienes. The ROMP activity
of Ru-20 is not detectable in the “presence of ethylene”; this was
incorrectly written as the “absence of ethylene”.
Equations 5 and 7, pages S47 and S135 respectively, had
errors that have been fixed in the corrected SI file.
None of the above affects any conclusions of the article.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
Figure 2. (A) Description of the chemical shift anisotropy and
orientation of the 77Se chemical shielding tensor of [Se(NHC)]
complexes. Univariate correlations of the isotropic 77Se NMR
chemical shielding σiso (B) and the σyy component of the chemical
shielding tensor (C) of [Se(NHC)] model compounds for ethenolysis
product 2 at t = 180 min for catalysts Ru-1−29 (excluding Ru-26).
S
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b12730.
© XXXX American Chemical Society
A
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b12730
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Addition/Correction
Full experimental and computational details and catalytic
data (PDF)
B
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b12730
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX