Transition Met Chem (2012) 37:37–43
43
When complete dissolution was attained, 1.458 g
of catalyst, under the same conditions as the catalytic runs.
No products were detected.
(
9.0 mmol) of FeCl was added to the solution and the
3
mixture was stirred for 120 min. A clear solution of
Acknowledgments The authors are grateful to the financial support
of this study by the Zanjan University.
Fe(OPr) in isopropanol was separated by centrifugation
3
and dried in vacuum, and the obtained solid was dissolved
in 20 mL of isopropanol. In a typical procedure, a solution
of acetylacetone (acacH, 18.0 mmol), i-PrOH (3 mL) and
Fe(OPr) (20.0 mL, acac/Fe(OPr) 2:1 molar ratio) was
References
3
3
heated under reflux for 1 h under N with stirring. To this
2
1. Bohnet M (2003) Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemis-
try, 7th edn. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
solution, a solution of 0.6 mL (9 mmol) phosphoric acid
2
. Rosowski F, Storck S, Z u¨ hlke J (2008) In: Ertl G, Knzinger H,
Sch u¨ th F, Weitkamp J (eds) Handbook of heterogeneous cataly-
sis, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, p 3425
8
5% and 0.6 g (4.5 mmol) potassium carbonate was added
under continuous stirring. The modified iron precursor and
the support precursor TEOS (9.8 mL) were dissolved in
i-PrOH (10 mL). A hydrolyzing solution consisting of
distilled water (6 mL) and concentrated nitric acid
3
. Schmidt RJ (2005) Appl Catal A 208:89–103
4. Yoo JS, Donohue JA, Kleefisch MS, Lin PS, Elfline SD (1993)
Appl Catal A 105:83–105
5
6
7
. Seki T, Baiker M (2009) Chem Rev 109:2409–2454
. Ilyas M, Sadiq M (2009) Catal Lett 128:337–342
. Hronec M, Hrabe Z (1986) Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 25:
257–261
(
0.27 mL) diluted in i-PrOH (6 mL) was added dropwise to
the alkoxides solution under vigorous stirring. After
0 min, the final solution was transferred into a Teflon-
9
8
9
. Wang F, Xu J, Li X, Gao J, Zhou L, Ohnishi R (2005) Adv Synth
Catal 347:1987–1992
. Suresh AK, Sharma MM, Sridhar T (2000) Ind Eng Chem Res
lined autoclave for solvent evaporation. The autoclave was
heated to 150 °C and kept at the final temperature for 5 h
to ensure complete thermal equilibration. The overall
aerogel yield per batch production was about 4.96 g, 43
wt%. The synthesized gel was divided into small particles
and calcined at 500 °C in air for 10 min to obtain nano-
composite KPFeSi. The compositions of the prepared cat-
alysts are presented in Table 1.
3
10. Abello MC, Gomez MF, Cadus LE (1998) Catal Lett 53:185–192
9:3958–3997
1
1. Rosowski F, Altwasser S, Dobner CK, Storck S, Z u¨ hlke J, Hibst H
2010) Catal Today 157:339–344
2. Cannas C, Gatteschi D, Musinu A, Piccaluga G, Sangregorio C
1998) J Phys Chem B 102:7721–7726
13. Kochkar H, Figueras F (1997) J Catal 171:420–430
(
1
(
1
4. Qiu F, Li Y, Yang D, Li X, Sun P (2011) Bioresour Technol
02:4150–4156
Catalyst samples were characterized by means of X-ray
diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM),
total surface area (BET), atomic absorption methods and
FTIR spectroscopy. The analyses of Fe were carried out by
atomic absorption spectroscopy, potassium was determined
by flame spectroscopy and phosphorous was determined
calorimetrically [32].
1
1
5. Lippincott ER, Van Volkenburg A, Weir CE, Bunting EN (1958)
J Res Natl Bur Stand 61:61–70
16. Hino H, Sato H (1971) Bull Chem Soc Jpn 44:33–37
1
1
1
7. Hoffmann P, Knozinger E (1987) Surface Sci 188:181–198
8. McDonald RS (1958) J Phys Chem 62:1168–1178
9. Rehspringer JL, Niznansky D (1995) J Non-Cryst Solids 180:
1
91–196
0. Ehrman SH, Friedlander SK, Zachariah MR (1999) J Mater Res
4:4551–4561
2
2
2
2
2
1
General oxidation procedure
1. Essehli R, El Bali B, Benmokhtar S, Fuess H, Svoboda I, Obbade
S (2010) J Alloys Compd 493:654–660
2. Bahranowski K, Dula R, Gasior M, Labanowska M, Michalik A,
Vartikian LA, Serwicka EM (2001) Appl Clay Sci 18:93–101
3. Ito S, Okuno T, Matsushima H, Tokii T, Nishida Y (1996) J
Chem Soc Dalton Trans 4479–4484
Catalytic oxidation of aromatics was performed under air
(
atmospheric pressure) in 25-mL round-bottomed flask
equipped with a condenser. In a typical experiment, the
flask was charged with 1 mmol of aromatic substrate, 2 mL
4. Chen X, Zhang J, Fu X, Antonietti M, Wang X (2009) J Am
Chem Soc 131:11658–11659
25. Leng Y, Ge H, Zhou C, Wang J (2008) Chem Eng J 145:335–339
acetonitrile as solvent, 2 mmol aqueous H O 30% and
2
2
0
.1 g chlorobenzene as internal standard that was unreac-
2
2
6. Shilov AE, Shul’pin GB (1997) Chem Rev 97:2879–2932
7. Ito S, Mitarai A, Hikino K, Hirama M, Sasaki K (1992) J Org
Chem 57:6937–6941
tive under the applied reaction conditions. The flask was
equipped with a magnetic stirring bar and placed in an oil
bath heated to 60 °C. During the catalytic run, samples
were withdrawn periodically and analyzed with a gas
chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector
2
8. Walling C (1975) J Am Chem Soc 97:363–367
29. Bianchi D, Bortolo R, Tassinari R, Ricci M, Vignola R (2000)
Angew Chem Int Ed 39:4321–4323
3
3
3
0. Conde A, D ´ı az-Requejo MM, P e´ rez PJ (2011) Chem Commun
7:8154–8156
(
FID) and a HP-5 capillary column. The oxidation products
4
were identified by comparing their retention times with
1
those of authentic samples or alternatively by H NMR
1. Masoudian S, Hosseini Monfared H, Aghaei A (2011) Transition
Met Chem 36:521–530
2. Kitson RE, Itson MG, Mellon MG (1944) Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed
and GC-Mass analyses. Conversions are based on the
added substrate and were determined by internal standard
method. Control reactions were carried out in the absence
1
6:379–383
123