6
60
SAL’KEEVA et al.
Ester I was further subjected to chemical modifica-
retardant properties of phosphites and phosphonates, as
well as amides of phosphonic acids have scarcely been
studied [3].
tion to prepare diamides. The latter may be interesting
for practical applications, in particular, as flame
retardants.
Aiming at a search for new flame retardants and
assessing their efficiency, we chose as objects for the
study phosphonomalonic diamide V and full amide of
ethylenetetracarboxylic acid VI.
(
Diethoxyphosphinoyl)malonic diamide (V) was
synthesized in high yield by the ammonolysis of ester I
with an excess of aqueous ammonia.
O
The efficiency of the potential flame retardants for
wood was assessed according to State Standard 16363-
76 (Comecon Standard 4686-84) by a procedure
involving measurement of the weight loss of wood
samples treated with impregnating compositions in
flame resistance tests and comparison of the results
with those for untreated samples.
O
NH OH
C
NH2
4
I
(EtO)2P CH
−2EtOH
C
O
NH2
V
By the same procedure we prepared enthylene-
tetracarboxylic acid tetramide (VI) which was used as
reference in the thermal stability study on organo-
phosphorus compounds V.
Impregnating compositions containing 5% solu-
tions of compounds V and 5 or 10% solutions of
compound VI were applied on all sides of dry and
weighed samples (three tests for each impregnating
solution). The concentrations were chosen taking into
account that our goal was to find an optimal flame-
retardant agent efficient at as low concentrations as
possible. The concentrations of known and widely
used flame-retardant solutions are generally no higher
than 50%. Use of more concentrated flame-retardant
solutions is economically inexpedient, since it hinders
drying of objects and deteriorates their performance
characteristics and increases toxicity.
O
O
C
NH OH
NH2
NH2
C
NH2
NH2
4
II
C
C
−
4EtOH
C
O
C
O
VI
As known, over the past years the problem of
imparting fire-retardant properties to materials of
different nature and uses is gaining in importance. This
is due to the fact that various materials are hazardous
during fires, since they are flammable, favor fire
propagation, and release much smoke and gases.
The known solvents for impregnating solutions are
water, ethanol, benzene, diethyl ether, etc. We
dissolved compound V in distilled water and
compound VI in benzene. The choice of solvents was
motivated by their chemical inertness with respect to
the solutes, as well as accessibility.
Even though at present a wide range of flame
retardants is available, including nitrogen-, phos-
phorus, and halogen-containing organic and inorganic
compounds, yet they are unable to meet all demands of
vigorously developing industry. This encourages
further R&D and implementation of fire-retardant
means, among which a particular place belongs to
organophosphorus compounds.
The treated samples were dried for 21 days until
complete dryness. After exposure to flame, untreated
wood samples lost their shape completely, whereas the
wood samples treated with impregnating solutions
completely or partially retained the shape.
Traditionally, wood and other cellulose materials
are the most widespread building materials. But,
although a number of advantages sets them apart from
other building materials, wood and cellulose materials
have certain drawbacks, the main of which are easy
ignitability and flammability. One of the most efficient
ways of flame protection of wood and cellulose
materials is their impregnation with flame retardants.
The flame-retardant efficiency was estimated from
the weight loss of a sample after exposure to flame,
using the following formula:
1 2 1
m = [(m – m )/m ]×100.
Here m is the sample weight before test, g, and m ,
1
2
sample weight after test, g.
Phosphorous acids and their esters and amidoesters
are highly reactive compounds which present both
practical and theoretical interest. However, the flame-
The result was taken as an arithmetic mean of three
test runs for each compound. The resulting data are
listed in the table.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 83 No. 4 2013