Organic Process Research & Development 2000, 4, 342−345
Technical Notes
Selectivity in Sulfonation of Triphenyl Phosphine
B. M. Bhanage, S. S. Divekar, R. M. Deshpande,* and R. V. Chaudhari
Homogeneous Catalysis DiVision, National Chemical Laboratory, Pune 411 008, India
Abstract:
such as triphenylphosphine monosulfonate (TPPMS), tri-
The selectivity of triphenyl phosphine sulfonation using 34%
SO to triphenyl phosphine trisulfonate (TPPTS) was studied.
3
phenyl phosphine disulfonate (TPPDS), triphenylphosphine
trisulfonate oxide (OTPPTS), and triphenylphosphine trisul-
fonate sulfide (STPPTS) in reasonable quantities (see Figure
1). Further, isolation of pure TPPTS is tedious. Herrmann
et al. have proposed sulfonation of triphenyl phosphine in
Several side products such as mono- and disulfonate, sulfonated
phosphine oxide, and sulfonated phosphine sulfides were also
observed. Reaction conditions were optimised to give 90% pure
TPPTS. Agitation speed, mode of agitation and temperature
have a strong influence on activity and selectivity of reaction.
The TPPTS formed was tested for its activity in hydroformy-
lation of ethylene and octene-1 in biphasic mode using [Rh-
1
5
3 2 4 3 3
superacid medium using SO /H SO /H BO . This method
reduces the formation of OTPPTS considerably. However,
selectivity towards TPPTS is very poor. The intermediate
TPPDS is formed selectively even under conditions of high
temperature (120 °C) and longer reaction times (72 h).
TPPTS is formed on further sulfonation of TPPDS, with
oleum.
2
(COD)Cl] .
There is thus a definite scope for improvement in the
existing procedure for the synthesis of TPPTS by sulfonation.
It is also essential to obtain TPPTS in an acceptable yield
and purity. The reaction conditions for the synthesis,
particularly the reaction period, temperature, and the ratio
of triphenyl phosphine to oleum are extremely important.
In this study we have investigated the role of mixing,
temperature, and reaction time on activity and selectivity to
TPPTS. The optimum conditions have been arrived at to
obtain TPPTS of suitable purity and high yield.
Introduction
Biphasic catalysis using metal complex catalysts involving
water soluble ligands is considered a major advancement in
catalyst product separation techniques. The use of water as
a solvent has numerous advantages, particularly considering
the environmental issues with conventional organic solvents.
In addition the facile separation strategy ensures efficient
recycle of catalyst, thereby avoiding highly involved separa-
tion techniques, reducing waste, and making the process
1
-5
ecofriendly.
Sulfonated phosphines have been applied
extensively in a variety of biphasic reactions due to their
very high solubility in water. The high solubility of the ligand
enables stabilization of the catalyst in the aqueous phase as
the ligand-to-metal ratio can be very high [triphenyl phos-
phine trisulfonate sodium (TPPTS) solubility in water is
Experimental Section
Materials. The ligand triphenyl phosphine (PPh ) was
procured from Fluka AG, Switzerland. Sulfuric acid (SD,
India), and sodium hydroxide (SD, India) of high purity were
purchased and used as received. All operations were per-
formed under argon atmosphere. Oleum of 65% strength was
prepared from 20% oleum by distillation. Distilled deionized
water was used in all operations. All solvents including water
were degassed prior to use.
3
=
1.1, kg/L]. Water soluble sulfonated phosphines are
generally synthesized by a sulfonation route which has many
advantages such as one-step synthesis, good yields, etc.
However, there are many other disadvantages of direct
sulfonation besides handling oleum, which also should be
considered. The major ones include poor selectivity, forma-
tion of side products, sensitivity towards air, etc. Since,
TPPTS is a component for catalyst synthesis, a relatively
pure compound is desired. However, the synthesis as
described earlier in Table 1, also gives numerous by-products
(6) Gaertner, R.; Cornils, B.; Springer, H.; Lappe P. U.S. Patent 4,483,802,
1984.
(7) Bahrmann, H.; Cornils, B.; Lappe, P.; Springer, H. U.S. Patent 4,710,321,
1
987.
(8) Bahrmann, H.; Cornils, B.; Lappe, P.; Springer, H. U.S. Patent 4,673,535,
987.
9) Kuntz, E. U.S. Patent 4,248,802, 1981.
10) Arhancet, J. P.; Davis, M. E.; Merola, J. S.; Hanson, B. E. J. Catal. 1990,
21, 327.
1
(
(
1
*
Author for correspondence. Telephone/Fax: +91 20 5893260. E-mail:
(11) Ahrland, S.; Chatt, J.; Davies, N. R.; Williams, A. A. J. Chem. Soc. 1958,
276.
rmdesh@ems.ncl.res.in.
(
1) Cornils, B.; Herrmann, W. A. Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with
organometallic compounds; VCH: 1996.
(12) Jenck, J.; Morel, D. U.S. Patent 4,668,824, 1987.
(13) Larpent, C.; Patin, H.; Thilmant, N.; Valdor, J. F. Synth. Commun. 1991,
21, 495.
(14) Bartik, T.; Bartik, B.; Hanson, B. E.; Glass, T.; Bebout, W. Inorg. Chem.
1992, 31, 2667.
(
(
(
2) Joo, F.; Katho, A. J. Mol. Catal. 1997, 116, 3
3) Cornils, B.; Wiebus, E. CHEMTECH 1995, 33.
4) Herrmann W. A.; Kohlpaintner C. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993,
3
2 1524.
(15) Herrmann, W. A.; Albanese, G. P.; Manetsberger, R. B.; Lappe, P.;
Bahrmann, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 811.
(
5) Kalck, P.; Monteil, F. AdV. Organomet. Chem, 1992, 34, 219.
3
42
•
Vol. 4, No. 5, 2000 / Organic Process Research & Development
10.1021/op0000226 CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society and The Royal Society of Chemistry
Published on Web 07/19/2000