264
H. Zhao et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 15 (2012) 261–265
Table 2
describes the activity and selectivity of the catalyst for three retest
runs with the reaction time 60 min. In the first run, the conversion
of crotonaldehyde was up to 99.45% with high butyraldehyde selec-
tivity of 90.11%. In the second run, the conversion of crotonaldehyde
maintained at 91.49%, whereas the selectivity of butyraldehyde in-
creased to 93.39%. In the third hydrogenation, the conversion of cro-
tonaldehyde decreased to 88.73% with the selectivity almost
constant at 93.40%. Fortunately, the structure of MOF-5 was pre-
served well throughout the reaction according to the XRD patterns
of the catalysts. Thus, the catalyst could be reused for several times
with some degree of reduced catalytic performance.
The activity and selectivity of different catalysts over the hydrogenation of
crotonaldehyde.
a
b
Catalysts
Ni loadings Reaction time CCROL
SBRAD
(%)
TOFCROL TOFBRAD
(min)
(%)
(h−1
)
(h−1
)
MOF-5
Ni@MOF-5 7.4
–
60
40
60
40
11.88
91.59
99.45
83.06
1.18
98.30
90.11
94.38
–
–
154.6
111.9
73.9
152.0
100.8
69.8
Ni@SiO2
28.0
a
CROL for crotonaldehyde.
BRAD for butyraldehyde.
b
the main product with a small amount of butanol and other by-products
whereas, no crotyl alcohol was detected.
Conclusions
The results of hydrogenation for crotonaldehyde are summarized
in Table 2. The yield of butyraldehyde was only 0.14% when the reac-
tion was conducted in the presence of MOF-5 at 100 °C for 60 min, il-
lustrating that MOF-5 itself had little catalytic performance for
hydrogenation. Using the same amount of the catalyst Ni@MOF-5,
the conversion of crotonaldehyde increased to 91.59% with high se-
lectivity of butyraldehyde (98.30%) at 100 °C for 40 min. However,
crotonaldehyde was almost completely converted (99.45%) with
slight decrease of selectivity (90.11%) after 60 min.
The catalytic activity of Ni@MOF-5 was also compared with that of
the industrial catalyst Ni/SiO2 containing 28.0 wt.% Ni with BET sur-
face area of 172.2 m2/g. Ni/SiO2 was treated under the same condi-
tions as Ni(acac)2@MOF-5 prior to the hydrogenation reaction. By
contrast, Ni/SiO2 with the catalytic amount (0.43 g) exhibited only
83.06% conversion with 94.38% selectivity of butyraldehyde at
100 °C for 40 min. In terms of the turnover of frequency (TOF,
denoted as the mole content of crotonaldehyde converted over per
mole Ni per hour), Ni@MOF-5 (154.6 h−1) showed a remarkably
higher activity than that of Ni/SiO2 (73.9 h−1). Consequently,
Ni@MOF-5 had a high catalytic activity and selectivity for C=C
bond hydrogenation. The superior activity of Ni@MOF-5 might be
mainly attributed to the larger nickel surface area resulted from the
small nickel nanoparticles supported on the support MOF-5.
In summary, Ni@MOF-5 (7.4 wt.% Ni) was successfully obtained by
wet impregnation strategy to deposit nickel on MOF-5 framework.
The nickel nanoparticles (2–6 nm) were probably located on the
outer surface of the MOF-5 contributing to its small pore diameter
(1.02 nm). Ni@MOF-5 displayed much higher catalytic activity in
comparison with that of the industrial catalyst Ni/SiO2. Furthermore,
the catalyst can be reused for several times with the preservation of
MOF-5 structure. Thus, MOF-5 promised a novel candidate of support
for hydrogenation catalyst. Current research may be well transferable
to load some active components (Pt, Ag and Au) on other robust
MOFs in this reaction, such as MIL series.
Acknowledgement
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the State Key
Laboratory for Oxo Synthesis and Selective Oxidation of China.
References
[1] A. Henschel, K. Gedrich, R. Kraehnert, S. Kaskel, Catalytic properties of MIL-101,
Chem. Commun. (2008) 4192–4194.
[2] N. Maksimchuk, M. Timofeeva, M. Melgunov, A. Shmakov, Y. Chesalov, D. Dybtsev,
V. Fedin, O. Kholdeeva, Heterogeneous selective oxidation catalysts based on co-
ordination polymer MIL-101 and transition metal-substituted polyoxometalates,
J. Catal. 257 (2008) 315–323.
[3] S. Proch, J. Herrmannsdörfer, R. Kempe, C. Kern, A. Jess, L. Seyfarth, J. Senker,
Pt@MOF-177: Synthesis, Room-Temperature Hydrogen Storage and Oxidation
Catalysis, Chem. Eur. J. 14 (2008) 8204–8212.
The reusability of Ni@MOF-5
[4] N.V. Maksimchuk, K.A. Kovalenko, S.S. Arzumanov, Y.A. Chesalov, M.S. Melgunov,
A.G. Stepanov, V.P. Fedin, O.A. Kholdeeva, Hybrid Polyoxotungstate/MIL-101
Materials: Synthesis, Characterization, and Catalysis of H2O2-Based Alkene Epox-
idation, Inorg. Chem. 49 (2010) 2920–2930.
To find out if the catalyst has retained its initial catalytic activity
and its structure, the reusability of the catalyst was carried. Fig. 4
[5] K. Schlichte, T. Kratzke, S. Kaskel, Improved synthesis, thermal stability and catalytic
properties of the metal-organic framework compound Cu3(BTC)2, Microporous
Mesoporous Mater. 73 (2004) 81–88.
[6] C. Serre, F. Millange, C. Thouvenot, M. Nogues, G. Marsolier, D. Louër, G. Férey,
Very Large Breathing Effect in the First Nanoporous Chromium(III)-Based Solids:
MIL-53 or CrIII(OH)·{O2C−C6H4−CO2}·{HO2C−C6H4−CO2H}x·H2Oy, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 13519–13526.
[7] S. Hasegawa, S. Horike, R. Matsuda, S. Furukawa, K. Mochizuki, Y. Kinoshita, S.
Kitagawa, Three-Dimensional Porous Coordination Polymer Functionalized with
Amide Groups Based on Tridentate Ligand: Selective Sorption and Catalysis, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) 2607–2614.
[8] M. Fujita, Y.J. Kwon, S. Washizu, K. Ogura, Preparation, Clathration Ability, and
Catalysis of a Two-Dimensional Square Network Material Composed of Cadmi-
um(II) and 4,4'-Bipyridine, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 (1994) 1151–1152.
[9] Y. Lu, M. Tonigold, B. Bredenkötter, D. Volkmer, J. Hitzbleck, G. Langstein, A Cobalt
(II)-containing Metal-Organic Framework Showing Catalytic Activity in Oxida-
tion Reactions, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 634 (2008) 2411–2417.
[10] J.S. Seo, D. Whang, H. Lee, S.I. Jun, J. Oh, Y.J. Jeon, K. Kim, A homochiral metal–
organic porous material for enantioselective separation and catalysis, Nature
404 (2000) 982–986.
[11] R.-Q. Zou, H. Sakurai, Q. Xu, Preparation, adsorption properties, and catalytic
activity of 3D porous metal-organic frameworks composed of cubic building
blocks and alkali-metal ions, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45 (2006) 2542–2546.
[12] D. Farrusseng, S. Aguado, C. Pinel, Metal–Organic Frameworks: Opportunities for
Catalysis, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (2009) 7502–7513.
[13] J. Lee, O.K. Farha, J. Roberts, K.A. Scheidt, S.T. Nguyen, J.T. Hupp, Metal–organic
framework materials as catalysts, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 (2009) 1450–1459.
[14] S.S. Kaye, A. Dailly, O.M. Yaghi, J.R. Long, Impact of Preparation and Handling on
the Hydrogen Storage Properties of Zn4O(1,4-benzenedicarboxylate)3 (MOF-5),
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) 14176–14177.
Fig. 4. The activity and selectivity for hydrogenation of crotonaldehyde in the three
retest runs.