2352
Z. Guo et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 2351–2353
OTBDMS
OTBDMS
OH
O
ii
iii
O
O
O
O
O
7
7
7
OH
OH
O
O
O
O
O
O
i
O
O
OH
O
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
O
1
3
2
7
OH
OH
OTBDMS
OH
iv
OTBDMS
v
vi
O
β
-CD
O
O
O
O
O
7
7
7
OTBDMS
HO
OTBDMS
O
OH
O
O
O
Cl
Cl
4
6
5
Scheme 1. Syntheses of per-2,3-di-O-chloroacetyl-b-cyclodextrin (14Cl-b-CD) and per-3-O-chloroacetyl-b-cyclodextrin (7Cl-b-CD). Reagents: (i) TBDMSCl, pyridine; (ii) CAC,
imidazole, DMAP, DMA; (iii) BF3ꢁEt2O, CH2Cl2; (iv) TBDMSCl, DMAP, pyridine/DMF; (v) CAC, imidazole, DMAP, DMA; (vi) BF3ꢁEt2O, CH2Cl2.
methylsilyl chloride (TBDMSCl) as the regioselective protection re-
agent (Scheme 1).
The precursor 1 with protected groups on the primary face of b-
CD is synthesized by Zhang’s method,10 which has modified the sep-
aration method of Fugedi11 with a yield higher than 90%. In the next
step of preparing the per-6-O-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2,3-di-O-
couldcontrolthepHofthesystem, theseveresidereactionsbetween
CACandthemresultedinviscousbrownproducts. Thisphenomenon
was also mentioned by Leduc and Chabrier12 The side reaction al-
most exhausted the chloroacetylation reagent CAC, thus the substi-
tution degree of the final pale product obtained by chromatographic
separation (eluant trichloromethane/methanol, 7:1) was much low-
er than the designed value (14). Imidazole, which is a weaker nucle-
ophilic reagent, could both avoid the side reaction and perform well
as proton scavenger to control the pH.
chloroacetyl-b-CD (compound 2), vacuum-dried compound
1
(1.94 g, 1 mmol) was dissolved in 30 mL anhydrous DMA and was
cooled to 0 °C. Imidazole (28 mmol, 2 equiv per OH function) and
dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP, 20 mg) were added to the solution
under argon. CAC (24 mmol, 1.7 equiv per OH) dissolved in anhy-
drous DMA (15 mL) was then added dropwise to the mixture solu-
tion with magnetic stirring. The reaction was carried out at 0 °C for
2 h and then at 50 °C for 6 h (pH 8). After rotary evaporating of
DMA from the slight yellow solution, the residue was redissolved
in 40 mL methylene chloride and was washed successively with sat-
urated NaHCO3 aqueous solution (2 ꢀ 100 mL) and water
(2 ꢀ 100 mL). The organic layer obtained was concentrated in vac-
uum and then recrystallized from CHCl3/hexane (1:9, v/v) to obtain
a white compound 2 (2.42 g, yield 80.2%). Its 1H NMR (CDCl3) peaks
of the Si(CH3)2 (d 0.05 ppm, 6H) and C(CH3)3 (d 0.88 ppm, 9H) reso-
nances are intact, which demonstrates that no deprotection has ta-
ken place at this step. The above-mentioned chloroacetylation
reaction is accompanied by HCl release, which might result in the
deprotection of TBDMS groups at high degree of temperature. We
found that two main factors could affect the deprotection while
chloroacetylating by CAC: pH and temperature of the reaction sys-
tem (Table 1). Triethylamine (TEA), pyridine and imidazole were
chosen as HCl acceptors at first. However, although TEA and pyridine
Finally, the compound 2 was deprotected by treatment with
13
BF3ꢁEt2O in dry CH2Cl2 to yield the compound 3 (1.49 g, overall
yield 60.3%): FTIR (KBr): 3393 cmꢂ1 O–H), 2930 cmꢂ1
(m (mC–H),
1751 cmꢂ1
(ppm) 5.35 (7H, H-3); 5.22 (7H, H-2); 4.85 (7H, H-1); 4.18 (28H, –
CH2Cl); 3.53–3.68 (28H, H-4, 5, 6, 60). Anal. Calcd for C70H84O49Cl14
(mC@O), 1154 (m
C–O–C); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): d
:
C, 38.12; H, 3.84; Cl, 22.5. Found: C, 38.80; H, 3.93; Cl, 22.4 (Schoni-
ger’s method14).
The per-6,2-di-O-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-b-CD (compound 4)
was synthesized according to the procedure described by Ashton
et al.,15 in which DMAP and pyridine/DMF were used as the
catalyst and co-solvent, respectively. In the next step of chloroacet-
ylation, due to the steric hindrance of the 3-position of the per-6,2-
protected-b-CD, stronger reaction conditions were applied to
realize the designed modification: (1) The molar ratio of CAC was
increased to 2.0 equiv per OH; (2) the reaction was carried out at
60 °C for 72 h (pH 8). The resonances (1H NMR) of the tert-butyldi-
methylsilyl groups on compound 5 exhibit no perturbation, which
demonstrates no deprotection has taken place under above-men-
tioned stronger condition. After a deprotection treatment with
BF3ꢁEt2O, the compound 6 was obtained (overall yield 28.6%) as:
1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): d (ppm) 5.23 (7H, H-3); 5.03 (7H,
H-1); 4.45 (14H, –CH2Cl); 3.50–4.10 (35H, H-2, 4, 5, 6, 60). Anal.
Calcd for C56H77O42Cl7: C, 40.24; H, 4.61; Cl, 14.88. Found: C,
40.47; H, 4.68; Cl, 14.14.
Table 1
Effect of pH and temperature on the formation of CD derivative 2
pH
Temperature
Remained protection
groups (TBDMS)
Chloroacetylation
degreeb
a
Current worksare underway to prepare and investigate star poly-
mers made from above-mentioned ATRP initiators. Preliminary
experiments show that polymers growing from the same CD-core
but with different 7, 14 and 21 arms are ideal models to study the ef-
fect of arm number on the properties and applications of star poly-
mers, which will be discussed in several forthcoming publications.
2
2
2
4
4
4
7
7
7
0
0
0
1
7
7
7
7
7
7
5.0
16.0
16.5
4.9
8.6
13.9
5.1
rt
50
0
rt
50
0
rt
50
8.9
13.8
Acknowledgements
a
Financial supports for this work from the NSERC Canada and the
National Natural Science Foundation of China (20704026) are
gratefully acknowledged.
The initial number of TBDMS group is 7.
b
1935ꢀCl%
Calculated as DS ¼
(the designed chloroacetylation degree for
35:5ꢀ100ꢂ76:5ꢀCl%
derivative 2 is 14).