502
LOPEZ-PRADO et al.
According to scheme 3 our target molecule 1 might The resulting catalyst Pd(0.5%)/Hβ was activated pre-
be transformed into two much simpler synthons viously by calcination at 200°C for 3 h followed by
derived from a nucleophilic cyclopentanoxide anion reduction at 200°C during 3 h with H2. The catalytic
and a primary DHPM ring (Scheme 3). This DHPM
nucleous might be obtained through three key discon-
nections that correspond to a known acid catalyzed
three-component condensation strategy between an
aldehyde, α,ß-ketoester and urea denoted as Biginelli
reaction (Scheme 3). Thus, our goal was the prepara-
tion of this DHPM ester 1 by planning the synthesis
forward and using a bifunctional catalyst (Scheme 2).
The catalyst should contain an acidic and a metal
function. The acid should be capable of assembling the
original three components (urea, oxoester and alde-
hyde) into the N-heterocycle DHPM, and the metal
function would allow starting the reaction from the
corresponding alcohol and to dehydrogenate it into
the aldehyde. This can be of interest when the alde-
hyde is not stable under reaction conditions or it is less
available (see Scheme 2).
To perform the alcohol dehydrogenation reaction
we thought on palladium nanoparticles supported on
a high surface area solid acid. The choice of the above
metal allows using molecular oxygen as green oxidant
in an oxidative dehydrogenation of the alcohol to the
aldehyde [44–51], while the solid acid support would
catalyze the consecutive cyclocondensation or Bigi-
nelli reaction leading to the final product DHPM
(Scheme 2). Preliminary tests revealed that the cata-
lytic results improved when the urea and α,ß-ketoester
reactants were incorporated sequentially after com-
pleting the formation of benzaldehyde, instead of add-
ing the three components simultaneously. Thus, tak-
ing into account these preliminary results, the experi-
mental procedure was adapted so that the urea and the
α,ß-ketoester were incorporated once the alcohol was
completely reacted.
In principle, since a solid with acid sites is required, and
taking into account the large size of the products, a struc-
tured mesoporous aluminosilicate MCM-41 (Si/Al = 15)
was selected as the solid acidic component of the bifunc-
tional catalyst [52]. Then palladium was deposited on
MCM-41 and the resulting catalyst Pd(1%)/
MCM41(Si/Al = 15) was tested for the benzyl alcohol,
urea and ethyl acetoacetate assembly to form 2-methyl-3-
ethylformiate-4-phenyl-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-
one (1) in TFT as solvent (entry 1, Table 1).
In this case the catalyst was active and selective for
performing the oxidative dehydrogenation step
(step a), but its activity and selectivity was low for the
cyclocondensation reaction step (step b) (entry 1,
Table 1). Notice that even Pd on γ-Al2O3 was a very
suitable catalyst for step a, and again better than
Pd/MCM41 for step b (entry 2, Table 1).
results in the two- step one-pot reaction in the pres-
ence of Pd(0.5%)/Hβ slightly increased though the
selectivity in the second step did not improve probably
due to steric limitations (entry 3, Table 1). Therefore,
it was decided to increase the reactant accessibility,
while maintaining a zeolitic acidity. For achieving this,
palladium was supported on a highly stable layered
zeolite precursor having structured readily accessible
external cups, as it is the case of ITQ-2 zeolite [54].
ITQ-2 was prepared with a Si/Al ratio of 12.5 [54]. In
this case the increased access to the catalytic sites for
large molecules contributed to improve the catalytic
results in the second step of the one-pot reaction,
although it was not so for the oxidation step (step a)
since in this case the results were significantly lower
than those obtained with zeolite β(entry 4, Table 1).
Besides this and in the search for new acid cata-
lysts, organic polymers with strong acidities such as
Amberlyst-15 were also tested with two different Pd
loadings [55, 56]. Unfortunately, with the highest
metal loading (1% Pd) the metal dispersion achieved
on this sulfonic resin was very low due to the low sur-
face area of Amberlyst-15 (45 m2/g), with the corre-
sponding poor results for the dehydrogenation step to
form benzaldehyde (see Table 1S in supplementary
material), while a competing acid catalyzed etherifica-
tion reaction giving rise to dibenzylether (2) as the
main product prevailed (entry 5 in Table 1, Fig. 1). In
accordance to this observation the catalytic results
improved considerably when the metal loading was
reduced by half (0.5%) (entry 6, Table 1) and the metal
dispersion was larger (see Table 1S in supplementary
material).
Other secondary products that were detected in
this sequential transformation were the imine N-ben-
cilidenurea (3), the aldol condensation product (4)
and traces of a dihydropyridine derivative (5) (Fig. 1)
described by Hantzsch in 1882. Formation of this
product 5 can be accounted for the condensation of
the aldehyde, the dicarbonylic compound and ammo-
nia derived from the thermal decomposition of urea
[42]. Taking that into account, it appears that the for-
mation of 5 could be completely avoided by keeping
the temperature of the multicomponent reaction at
80°C (see Fig. 1).
From these results presented in Fig. 1 the benefit of
using a catalyst with strong acidity when operating at
low temperatures is clear. Thus in the search for a solid
with strong acid groups (−SO3H) that, at the same
time, had a surface area large enough to achieve good
metal dispersion we selected the nanocomposite sil-
ica-Nafion named SAC-13 [52]. This material, which
is produced by the entrapment of nanometer sized
Nafion resin particles (having highly acidic fluoro sul-
phonic acid groups) in a highly porous silica network,
At this point we decided to modify the acidic com-
ponent of the catalyst increasing the acidity by using a
large pore high silica zeolite such as Beta, and to
disperse Pd on the surface. For achieving high Pd dis-
persions we followed the method of Zhang el al. [53]. has a BET surface area in the range of 150–500 m2/g
PETROLEUM CHEMISTRY
Vol. 60
No. 4
2020