6150
S. R. V. Kandula, P. Kumar / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 6149–6151
Acknowledgements
ligand under the Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation
conditions10 gave the diol 6 in excellent yield, [h]2D5
+11.23 (c 1, CHCl3) [lit.11 [h]D25 +10.1 (c 1.42, CHCl3)].
Regioselective conversion of the diol 6 to bromohydrin
7 was achieved employing the protocol developed by
Sharpless.12 Thus, treatment of 6 with hydrogen bro-
mide in acetic acid gave 713 in 83% yield. Subsequently,
the hydroxyl group was protected as a silyl ether using
tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride and imidazole in the
presence of a catalytic amount of DMAP to afford 8 in
92% yield which on treatment with triphenylphosphine
in acetonitrile under reflux conditions furnished the
phosphonium salt 9 in good yield.
Subba Rao thanks CSIR, New Delhi for financial
assistance. We are grateful to Dr. M. K. Gurjar for his
support and encouragement.
References
1. Bell, F. P. In Pharmacological Control of Hyperlipidemia;
Prous, J. R., Ed.; Science Publishers, 1986; pp. 409–422.
2. Heilder, J. G. In Pharmacological Control of Hyperlipi-
demia; Prous, J. R., Ed.; Science Publishers, 1986; pp.
423–438.
Scheme 2 summarizes the preparation of fragment 13
from the commercially available methyl (R)-lactate.
Hydroxyl protection of 10 as the THP ether was fol-
lowed by reduction of the ester to the corresponding
alcohol 12 in good yield. The subsequent PCC oxida-
tion resulted in the formation of the aldehyde 13, which
was used in the next reaction without any further
purification.
3. Naganuma, S.; Sakai, K.; Endo, A. J. Antibiot. 1992, 45,
1216–1221.
4. (a) Geran, R. I.; Greenberg, N. H.; MacDonald, M. M.;
Schumacher, A. M.; Abbott, B. J. Cancer Chemother.
Rep. 1972, 3, 1–88; (b) Rupprecht, J. K.; Hui, Y. H.;
McLaughlin, J. L. J. Nat. Prod. 1990, 53, 237–278; (c)
Fang, X. P.; Rieser, M. J.; Gu, Z. M.; Zhao, G. X.;
McLaughlin, J. L. Phytochem. Anal. 1993, 4, 27–48.
5. Ishigami, K.; Kitahara, T. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 6431–
6442.
The final step involved the coupling of phosphonium
salt 9 with aldehyde 13 and subsequent cyclization. To
this end, the Wittig olefination between 9 and 13 was
carried out in the presence of LiHMDS at −78°C to
give the olefin 1414 in 73% yield. Subsequent cyclization
using a catalytic amount of p-TsOH in methanol fur-
nished (−)-acaterin in 68% yield, [h]2D5 −21.33 (c 0.3,
CHCl3) [lit.5 [h]D25 −19.7 (c 0.61, CHCl3)] (Scheme 3).
The physical and spectroscopic data of 1 were in full
agreement with the literature data.5
6. Sekiyama, Y.; Fujimoto, Y.; Hasumi, K.; Endo, A. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 5649–5654.
7. (a) Vijay Anad, R.; Baktharaman, S.; Singh, V. K. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5393–5395; (b) Franck, X.;
Figadere, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1449–1451.
8. (a) Pais, G. C. G.; Fernandes, R. A.; Kumar, P. Tetra-
hedron 1999, 55, 13445–13450; (b) Fernandes, R. A.;
Kumar, P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 4349–4356;
(c) Fernandes, R. A.; Kumar, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
2921–2923.
9. (a) Fernandes, R. A.; Kumar, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
3447–3449; (b) Fernandes, R. A.; Kumar, P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 10309–10312; (c) Kandula, S. R. V.;
Kumar, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 1957–1958; (d)
Pandey, R. K.; Fernandes, R. A.; Kumar, P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 4425–4426; (e) Fernandes, R. A.; Kumar,
P. Synthesis 2003, 129–135; (f) Naidu, S. V.; Kumar, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 1035–1037.
10. (a) Becker, H.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1996, 35, 448–481; (b) Torri, S.; Liu, P.; Bhuvaneswari,
N.; Amatore, C.; Jutand, A. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
3055–3060; (c) for a review on asymmetric dihydroxyla-
tion, see: Kolb, H. C.; VanNiewenhze, M. S.; Sharpless,
K. B. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2483–2547.
In conclusion, we have developed a new synthetic route
to (−)-acaterin employing Sharpless asymmetric dihy-
droxylation and Wittig olefination as key steps. A short
reaction sequence and high yielding steps to (−)-aca-
terin renders our strategy a good alternative to the
known methods. Currently, studies are in progress for
the synthesis of other isomers of acaterin including
4-dehydroacaterin, using an intermolecular Refor-
matsky reaction as the key step.
11. Gurjar, M. K.; Sylesh Kumar, V.; Venkateswara Rao, B.
Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 12563–12576.
12. Fleming, R. P.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
2869–2875.
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) DHP, p-TsOH (cat.),
dry CH2Cl2, 96%; (b) LiAlH4, dry THF, 0°C–rt, 12 h, 92%;
(c) PCC, anhydrous CH3COONa, Celite, 4 h.
13. Compound 7: [h]2D5 +36.14, mp 41–41.5°C, IR (CHCl3):
3604, 3019, 2928, 2400, 1735, 1658, 1215, 756, 669; 1H
NMR (200 MHz): 0.85 (t, J=6.3 Hz, 3H), 1.26–1.42 (m,
10H), 1.81–1.92 (2H, m), 3.01 (bs, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H),
4.09–4.13 (d, J=8 Hz, 1H), 3.97 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (50
MHz): 13.81, 22.41, 25.02, 28.96, 29.14, 31.57, 33.22,
47.89, 52.74, 72.11, 169.70; MS: m/z 279 (M+−2), 263,
197, 183, 168, 152, 140, 123, 111, 95, 81. Anal. calcd for
C11H21O3Br (281.18) C, 46.98; H, 7.52; Br, 28.41. Found
C, 47.07; H, 7.65; Br, 28.14%.
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) LiHMDS, dry THF,
−78°C, 30 min then 13, 10 h, 73%; (b) cat. p-TsOH, MeOH,
overnight, 68%.