Alkyl Halide Reduction by SmI2/H2O/Amine
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 2
The heavy atom KIE is slightly larger with 1-bromodecane than
with 1-iododecane, as expected from their differences in mass.27
The electron transfer (ET) from complex B to the alkyl halide
may proceed via an inner or an outer sphere mechanism. The
k12/k13 KIE does not differ significantly for an inner and an outer
sphere electron transfer mechanism.28 On the other hand the
secondary-deuterium KIEs have been suggested to differ
considerably for electron transfer mechanisms proceeding via
outer sphere (kH/kD ≈ 1.01-1.04) and inner sphere electron
transfer (kH/kD ≈ 1.30-1.50). The observed small secondary
kH/kD KIE of 1.041 ( 0.020 therefore suggests that the reduction
of 1-bromodecane proceeds via an outer sphere electron transfer
mechanism. However, the validity of this distinction has been
questioned since some electron transfers may be diffusion
controlled.29 There are also different opinions whether the SmI2/
HMPA-mediated reduction of alkyl halides proceeds through
an inner or an outer sphere electron transfer.23,30 Still, the clean
reaction orders strongly indicate a system with an unstable
intermediate. Therefore the rate of electron transfer is much
lower than that of dissociation of the SmI2 precomplex B, i.e.,
kET , kdiss (Schemes 2 and 3). The Marcus theory describes
outer sphere electron transfer reactions.31 According to this
theory outer sphere ET generally shows a correlation between
∆Gq and ∆G° for the reaction. The ∆Gq’s for the reduction of
the decyl halides were obtained from the respective initial rates,
and the ∆G°’s for the alkyl halides were taken from the
potentials of butyl chloride (E ) 1.246 V), butyl bromide (E )
1.105 V), and butyl iodide (E ) 1.075 V) reported by Save´ant
and co-workers (assuming similar relative potentials for decyl
and butyl).32 The experiments show that decyl bromide and
decyl chloride have 7.9 and 18 kJ mol-1, respectively, higher
activation energy than decyl iodide, while the reported free
energies are 3.3 and 18 kJ mol-1, respectively, higher than decyl
iodide. Thus, there is indeed a good correlation between ∆Gq
(decyl halides) and ∆G° (butyl halides) with the slope being
almost unity, consistent with an outer sphere electron transfer.
The outer sphere electron transfer to alkyl halides has received
much attention; both Save´ant and Fukuzumi with co-workers
have reported that the rate of reduction is insensitive to steric
hindrance.32,33 Furthermore, Rieke and co-workers reported that
there is only a limited difference in rate of reductions of isomeric
alkyl halides for outer sphere electron transfer reactions.13 An
Scheme 3. Mechanism Describing the Final Steps in the
Reduction of Alkyl Halides (solvent molecules have been excluded
for clarity)
of -148 J K-1 mol-1 for SmI2/H2O/amine is significantly more
negative than the value of -125 J K-1 mol-1 for SmI2-HMPA.
This substantial loss in entropy indicates that the reaction
proceeds through a larger molecular assembly, possibly a dimer
(Scheme 2).
Altogether, the results of the kinetic measurements indicate
that the amine is involved in an unfavorable, fast deprotonation
of a coordinated water molecule in complex A. The absence of
changes in the UV-vis spectra with the addition of an amine
to complex A indicates a necessary, but also unfavorable, pre-
equilibrium deprotonation that transforms into the short-lived
anion intermediate B.
Complex B, being negatively charged, can be the powerful
reductant responsible for the fast reductions with SmI2/H2O/
amine. Thus, the activated complex for the SmI2/H2O/amine-
mediated reduction of 1-chlorodecane is suggested to consist
of a dimer of SmI2 with one bridging water molecule, one
hydroxide, and possibly two more coordinated water molecules,
the protonated amine, and the alkyl halide, Scheme 3. It is
possible that dimers of SmI2 with bridging water molecules may
also exist in the absence of amine.24 Corresponding bridging
oxygens bound to two samariums have previously been observed
for SmIII in the solid state.25 The occurrence of dimeric samarium
species has also been proposed by Curran et al. to explain the
mechanistic behavior of intramolecular samarium Barbier
couplings.26
alkyl halide that undergoes outer sphere ET has ln(ks-R-X
/
(27) Melander, L.; Saunders, W. H., Jr. Reaction Rates of Isotopic Molecules;
John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1980; pp 8-24.
(28) Holm and Crossland have reported a k12/k13 ) 1.035 for inner sphere
electron transfer to CH3I to generate methyl radicals at 250 °C. They
estimated that the k12/k13 would correspond to 1.056 at 20 °C. They also
reported that an outer sphere electron transfer mechanism may give rise to
a k12/k13 KIE of 1.023 ( 0.009. Holm T.; Crossland I. Acta Chem. Scand.
1996, 50, 90-93.
Inner vs Outer Sphere Electron Transfer. The observed
13C kinetic isotope effects (k12/k13) of 1.037 ( 0.007 and 1.062
( 0.015 for 1-iododecane and 1-bromodecane, respectively,
indicate partial carbon-halide bond breakage in the rate-
determining step, in agreement with the proposed mechanism.
(29) Holm, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 515-518.
(30) Enemarke, R. J.; Daasbjerg, K.; Skrydstrup, T. Chem. Commun. 1999, 4,
343-344. (b) Enemarke, R. J.; Hertz, T.; Skrydstrup, T.; Daasbjerg, K.
Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3747-3754. (c) Shabangi, M.; Kuhlman, M. L.;
Flowers, R. A., II. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 2133-2135. (d) Miller, R. S.; Sealy,
J. M.; Shabangi, M.; Kuhlman, M. L.; Fuchs, J. R.; Flowers, R. A., II. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7718-7722.
(31) Albery, W. J. Ann. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1980, 31, 227-263. (b) Jordan, R.
B. In Topics in Inorganic Chemistry: Reaction Mechanisms of Inorganic
and Organometallic Systems; Oxford University Press: New York, 1998;
pp 188-220.
(32) Save´ant, J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6788-6795.
(33) Fukuzumi, S.; Suenobu, T.; Hirasaka, T.; Arakawa, R.; Kadish, K. M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9220-9227. (b) Ishikawa, M.; Fukuzumi, S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8864-8872. (c) Andrieux, C. P.; Gallardo,
I.; Save´ant, J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1620-1626. (d) Andrieux,
C. P.; Gallardo, I.; Save´ant, J.-M. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3815-3823.
(23) Prasad, E.; Flowers, R. A., II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6895-6899.
(24) Flowers, R. A., II. Lehigh University, PA, unpublished results.
(25) Massarweh, G.; Fischer, R. D. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 444, 67-74.
(b) Stehr, J.; Fischer, R. D. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 459, 79-86. (c)
Hou, Z.; Fujita, A.; Yamazaki, H.; Wakatsuki, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 7843-7844. (d) Ma, W.-W.; Wu, Z.-Z.; Cai, R.-F.; Huang, Z.-E.; Sun,
J. Polyhedron 1997, 16, 3723-3728.
(26) Curran, D. P.; Gu, X.; Zhang, W.; Dowd, P. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 9023-
9042.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 23, 2005 8345