COMMUNICATIONS
[4] R. G. Pearson, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1990, 100, 403 ± 425.
[5] S. M. Azad, S. M. W. Bennett, S. M. Brown, J. Green, E. Sinn, C. M.
Topping, S. Woodward, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans 1 1997, 687 ± 694.
[6] A. E. Shirk, D. F. Shriver, Inorg. Synth. 1977, 17, 45 ± 47.
[7] Data for structure 5 are given in the supporting information. BINOL
analogues are known, see a) M. Shibasaki, H. Sasai, T. Arai, Angew.
Chem. 1997, 109, 1290 ± 1310; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36,
1237 ± 1256; b) T. Iida, N. Yamamoto, H. Sasai, M. Shibasaki, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4783 ± 84; c) T. Iida, N. Yamamoto, S.
Matsunaga, H.-G. Woo, M. Shibasaki, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110,
2383 ± 2386; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2223 ± 2226.
[8] For related chemistry, see a) C. W. Lindsley, M. DiMare, Tetrahedron
Lett. 1994, 35, 5141 ± 5144; b) A. Arase, M. Hoshi, T. Yamaki, H.
Nakanishi, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994, 855 ± 856.
[9] a) G. Giffels, C. Dreisbach, U. Kragl, M. Weigerding, H. Waldmann, C.
Wandrey, Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 2165 ± 2166; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl. 1995, 34, 2005 ± 2006; b) F. Almqvist, L. Torstensson, A.
Gudmundsson, T. Frejd, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 388 ± 389; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 376 ± 377.
weeks did not affect the ee value for the reduction of 1a,
neither did deliberate addition of water to the reaction (one
equivalent per Ga, to simulate impure ªwetº ketones).
The enantioselectivity in the reduction of 1a shows an
unusual temperature dependence: a maximum ee value is
attained at 20 to 158C, both the chemical yield and ee
value decrease steadily at temperatures below this range. At
788C an 18% yield of racemic alcohol is realized. One
explanation of this behavior is that transmetalation of 4 to 3
(X MTB dianion) is slow below 208C and that an achiral
catalytic process begins to compete. Support for this hypo-
thesis comes from the observation that added lithium
alkoxides do catalyze catecholborane reduction of 1a via
the borate 6.[8] The use of the MTB ligand is vital to the
reaction; LiGaH4 with either 1,1'-bi(2-naphthol) or 1,1'-bi(2-
thionaphthol) leads to low selectivities (3 ± 34% ee). The
probable causes are decomplexation of the chiral ligand by
catecholborane and poor lithium coordination. Both the
presence of 6 and removal of the chiral ligand may account,
in part, for the lower enantioselectivities encountered in some
recent titanium work.[9]
[10] a) Review: C. Girard, H. B. Kagan, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 3088 ±
3127; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2922 ± 2959; b) D. G. Black-
mond, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12934 ± 12937; c) D. Guillaneux,
S. H. Zhao, O. Samuel, D. Rainford, H. B. Kagan, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 9430 ± 9439.
The solid-state structure of the pre-catalyst 5[7] is not
retained in solution during the catalysis. The new species
formed are currently still under investigation. However, the
absence of a nonlinear effect[10] in the reduction of 1a by 5
suggests that a mononuclear catalyst with a single active MTB
ligand is responsible for the enantioselection. In Noyoriꢁs
BINAL reagent[3] the (Ra)-ligand gives the (R)-alcohol
because of repulsion between the n electrons of the reagent
and the p electrons of the substrate. The similarity in the ee
value for the reduction of 1a ± d suggests a related electronic
control with 5, but steric factors cannot be ruled out.
Hydroformylation of Internal Olefins to Linear
Aldehydes with Novel Rhodium Catalysts**
Lars A. van der Veen, Paul C. J. Kamer, and
Piet W. N. M. van Leeuwen*
Hydroformylation is one of the worldꢁs largest homoge-
neously catalyzed processes in industry, which produces more
than six million tons of aldehydes and alcohols annually.[1]
Since linear aldehydes are the most desired products a key
issue in this process is the control of regiochemistry. High
selectivities in the hydroformylation of terminal alkenes have
been reported for both diphosphites and diphosphanes.[2]
Selective hydroformylation of internal alkenes, which is of great
interest in industry and in synthetic organic chemistry, on the
other hand is still a relatively unexplored terrain (Scheme 1).
Experimental Section
All operations were performed under argon. A solution of MTB (15 mg,
0.05 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was treated with LiGaH4 (100 mL of a 0.25m
solution in Et2O) and the mixture stirred (208C, 25 min). The reaction was
cooled to 208C and catecholborane (1.1 mL of a 1m THF solution,
1.1 mmol) and ketone (1.0 mmol) were added. The solution was stirred at
208C for 18 h (method A), or sealed and stored at 208C (method B;
158C and 4 mol% catalyst for 1d). Alternatively, the catecholborane and
ketone were added at 788C and the reaction mixture stirred as it warmed
to room temperature overnight (method C). Normal workup procedures
afforded the alcohols 2 as essentially single products (the ee values were
determined by gas chromatography on a chiral column (LIPODEX A or
CYCLODEX B) or the a-methoxy-a-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl acetate
analyzed for the alcohol of 1h).
Scheme 1. The hydroformylation of trans-4-octene to linear and branched
aldehydes.
Received: July 28, 1998 [Z12216IE]
German version: Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 347 ± 349
Keywords: asymmetric reductions ´ gallium ´ hydrides ´
ketones
[*] Prof. Dr. P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, L. A. van der Veen,
Dr. P. C. J. Kamer
Institute of Molecular Chemistry
University of Amsterdam
Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam (The Netherlands)
Fax: (31)20-525-6456
[1] a) Review: E. J. Corey, C. J. Helal, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 2092 ±
2118; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1987 ± 2012; b) E. J. Corey, R. K.
Bakshi, S. Shibata, C.-P. Chen, V. K. Singh, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987,
109, 7925 ± 7926.
[**] This work was supported by SON/STW.
[2] Review: R. Noyori, S. Hashiguchi, Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 97 ± 102.
[3] R. Noyori, I. Tomino, Y. Tanimoto, M. Nishizawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1984, 106, 6709 ± 6716.
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW
thor.
336
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 1999
1433-7851/99/3803-0336 $ 17.50+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, No. 3