Inorganic Chemistry
Communication
(c) Wang, F.; Tan, Y.-X.; Yang, H.; Zhang, H.; Kang, Y.; Zhang, J.
Chem. Commun. 2011, 5828.
(4) (a) Wang, F.; Liu, Z.-S.; Yang, H.; Tan, Y.-X.; Zhang, J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 450. (b) Das, M. C.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z.-Y.;
Srinivas, G.; Zhou, W.; Yue, Y.-F.; Nesterov, V. N.; Qian, G.-D.; Chen,
B.-L. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 11715.
is difficult to explain at the current stage. It is clear that the
slight structural difference between 1 and 2 leads to their
discrepancy in the band-gap sizes, which might also affect their
discrepancy in the photocatalytic activity.
In order to investigate the stability of two isomers as visible-
light photocatalysts, we repeated the photocatalytic degradation
of MB three times. It is interesting that they still keep similar
photocatalytic efficiencies and the PXRD patterns of two
isomers at the end of each repeated bleaching experiment are
almost identical with that of the as-prepared sample (Figures
S7, S8, and S17−S19 in the SI). We analyzed the total organic
carbon (TOC) of the organic residues after photocatalysis
experiments of isomer 1 (Table S1 in the SI). The results reveal
that the TOC decreases obviously, which infers that the dyes
should degrade into carbon dioxide. Compared to other
reported CPs with photocatalytic properties, both photo-
catalysts 1 and 2 show high visible-light-driven photocatalytic
efficiency.4a,5,11
In summary, through in situ “click” reactions in different
solvents, two isomeric two-dimensional copper(I) materials
based on an in situ generated ptz ligand were successfully
synthesized. The results reveal distinct photoluminescent and
photocatalytic properties presented by two such isomers with
very similar structural features. This work is an interesting
comparative study on the structure−property correlation
between isomeric materials. Considering their high efficiency
and high stability on the photocatalytic degradation of organic
dyes, both isomeric materials might be good candidates for
photocatalytic applications.
(5) (a) Fu, Y.-H.; Sun, D.-R.; Chen, Y.-J.; Huang, R.-K.; Ding, Z.-X.;
Fu, X.-Z.; Li, Z.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3364. (b) Wen, L.-
L.; Zhao, J.-B.; Lv, K.-L.; Wu, Y.-H.; Deng, K.-J.; Leng, X.-K.; Li, D.-F.
Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 1603. (c) Mahata, P.; Madras, G.;
Natarajan, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 13759.
(6) Synthesis of isomers 1 and 2: A mixture of Cu2O (0.0143 g, 0.1
mmol), 3-cyanopyrimidine (0.0105 g, 0.1 mmol), and NaN3 (0.0325 g,
0.5 mmol) in a mixed DMF/ethanol solvent (3/9 mL) along with a
few drops of NH3·H2O was stirred for 15 min. It was then transferred
and sealed in a 23 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel reactor, which was
heated in an oven to 160 °C for 72 h and then cooled to room
temperature. Pale-yellow sheet crystals of 1 were obtained as the main
product (86% yield). 2 was prepared by using a similar procedure
except with toluene replacing ethanol. Pale-blue sheet crystals of 2
were collected and dried in air (80% yield).
(7) (a) Zhao, H.; Qu, Z.-R.; Ye, H.-Y.; Xiong, R.-G. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2008, 37, 84. (b) Li, Z. M.; Li, D. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3390.
(c) Wen, T.; Li, M.; Zhou, X.-P.; Li, D. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 5684.
(d) Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 2004.
(8) The diffraction data of 1 and 2 were collected on an Oxford
Xcalibur diffractometer equipped with graphite-monochromatized Mo
Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 293(2) K. Crystal data for 1:
C6H4CuN5, M = 209.68, triclinic, a = 5.8132(4) Å, b = 7.9619(12) Å, c
= 8.2074(9) Å, α = 67.801(12)°, β = 74.775(7)°, γ = 83.256(8)°, V =
339.29(7) Å3, T = 293(2) K, space group P1, Z = 2, 2025 reflections
̅
measured, 1189 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0531). The final R1
value was 0.0594 [I > 2σ(I)]. The final wR(F2) value was 0.1568 [I >
2σ(I)]. The final R1 value was 0.0638 (all data). The final wR(F2)
value was 0.1591 (all data). The goodness of fit on F2 was 1.196.
Crystal data for 2: C18H12Cu3N15, M = 629.08, triclinic, a = 9.022(3)
Å, b = 10.445(2) Å, c = 12.295(3) Å, α = 71.225(19)°, β = 75.08(2)°,
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
Experimental details, additional figures, TGA, PXRD patterns,
and a CIF file. This material is available free of charge via the
γ = 70.25(2)°, V = 1017.9(4) Å3, T = 293(2) K, space group P1, Z = 2,
̅
6030 reflections measured, 3311 independent reflections (Rint
=
0.1262). The final R1 value was 0.1041 [I > 2σ(I)]. The final wR(F2)
value was 0.2898 [I > 2σ(I)]. The final R1 value was 0.3096 (all data).
The final wR(F2) value was 0.3555 (all data). The goodness of fit on
F2 was 0.828. The structures were solved by direct methods and
refined by full-matrix least squares on F2 using the SHELXTL-97
program.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
(9) (a) Hu, J.-S.; Qin, L.; Zhang, D. M.; Yao, Q. X.; Li, Z. Y.; Guo, Z.-
J.; Zheng, H.-G.; Xue, Z.-L. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 681. (b) Han,
T.-Y.; Feng, X.; Tong, B.; Shi, J.-B.; Chen, L.; Zhi, J.-G.; Dong, Y.-P.
Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 416. (c) Yam, V. W.-W.; Lo, K. K.-W. Chem.
Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 323.
(10) (a) Kim, T. H.; Shin, Y. W.; Jung, J. H.; Kim, J. S.; Kim, J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 685. (b) Chen, D.; Liu, Y.-J.; Lin, Y.-
Y.; Zhang, J.-P.; Chen, X.-M. CrystEngComm 2011, 13, 3827.
(11) Zhang, H.; Zong., R.; Zhu, Y. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 4605.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This work is supported by the 973 program (Grants
2011CB932504 and 2012CB821705), National Science Foun-
dation (NSF) of China (Grants 21073191, 21221001, and
91222105), NSF of Fujian Province (Grant 2011J06005), and
CAS.
REFERENCES
■
(1) (a) Fer
́
ey, G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 191. (b) D’Alessandro, D.
M.; Smit, B.; Long, J. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6058.
(c) Zheng, S.; Wu, T.; Zuo, F.; Chou, C.-T.; Feng, P.; Bu, X. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1934. (d) Lin, Q.; Wu, T.; Zheng, S.; Bu, X.;
Feng, P. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 11852.
(2) (a) Cui, Y. J.; Yue, Y. F.; Qian, G. D.; Chen, B. L. Chem. Rev.
2012, 112, 1126. (b) Jiang, H. L.; Tatsu, Y.; Lu., Z. H.; Xu, Q. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5586. (c) Zhao, X.; Wu, T.; Zheng, S.-T.; Wang,
L.; Bu, X.; Feng, P. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 5536.
(3) (a) Caskey, S. R.; Wong-Foy, A. G.; Matzger, A. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 10870. (b) Vaidhyanathan, R.; Iremonger, S. S.;
Dawson, K. W.; Shimizu, H, G. K. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5230.
14
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic302273h | Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 12−14