Russian Chemical Bulletin, International Edition, Vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 15891592, September, 2001
1589
Deep oxidation of methane on granulated and monolith
coppermanganese oxide catalysts
«
K. I. Slovetskaya, A. A. Greish, M. P. Vorob´eva, and L. M. Kustov
N. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences,
4
7 Leninsky prosp., 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Fax: +7 (095) 135 5328. E-mail: greish@ioc.ac.ru
Deep oxidation of methane on the granulated CuMn-mixed oxide catalyst and metallic
monolith catalysts coated with the same oxide was studied. The experimental kinetic curves
for both monolith and granulated catalysts are satisfactorily described by the first-order rate
law. The values of activation energies, reaction rate constants, and feed flow rates for the
specified conversion almost coincide for both types of the catalysts. The data obtained
confirm the possibility of a quantitative comparison of the activities of the granulated and
monolith catalysts. The activity of the monoliths is proportional to the concentration of the
active component.
Key words: methane, oxidation, kinetics, CuMn-mixed oxide catalyst, monolith catalyst.
1
Monolith catalysts have a lower gas-dynamic resis-
tance than granulated catalysts. In addition, in mono-
lith catalysts cross sections of heat and mass flows are
uniform and that decreases the probability of the forma-
tion of "hot" zones and improves the time-on stream
behavior of the catalyst and process selectivity. Finally,
when the active component is supported on the mono-
lith surface as the secondary coating, its fraction in the
reaction space unit is 0.010.25, which is much lower
than 0.51 characteristic of granulated catalysts.
Thus, the volume of monolith catalysts exceeds that
of granulated catalysts by several times at a lower con-
tent of the active component. All this impedes strongly
to compare activities of granulated and monolith cata-
lysts under identical conditions.
stants showed that the rate constants of ÑÍ4 oxi-
dation per unit volume of the active component
(LaMnOperovskite) were identical for the mono-
lith and granules when the process was controlled by
kinetics. The method for comparison of activities of
granulated and monolith catalysts is applicable for ce-
ramic monoliths only, which can be subjected to crash-
ing with fractionation. For metallic monoliths, the prepa-
ration of similar fractions by crashing or grinding of the
starting catalyst is completely impossible and, hence,
another method for comparison of activities is necessary.
The purpose of this work is under identical condi-
tions and compare the activities of the granulated oxide
catalyst based on Mn and Cu oxides (Carulite-200) and
monolith metallic catalyst with supported Carulite as an
active component.
In several works, activities of monolith catalysts are
compared comparing the reaction temperature Ò at
α
which the conversion has a set value α or the tempera-
Experimental
ture dependence of the conversion (α ) at a set catalyst
Ò
2
5
volume and a set feed gas space velocity.
These
The starting granulated catalyst Carulite-200 with a specific
surface area of 273 m2 g1 contained 52.7 wt.% manganese
oxide and 11.40 wt.% copper oxide. To obtain monolith cata-
lysts, the foil of the FeCrAl alloy 80 µm thick was coated
with a thin layer of Carulite. The oxide coating was supported
by the electrophoretic deposition9 of a suspension containing
finely ground Carulite (8.2 g L1, particle size 510 µm) in a
solution of aluminum hydroxide sol in ethanol (the content of
AlO(OH) was 8.2 g L1). After deposition the samples obtained
were dried in air for 36 h at 20 °C and then calcined in an air
flow for 2 h at 500 °C. The smooth and corrugated foil layers
coated with Carulite were put together and rolled to form a
monolith with a height of 2.6 cm and a cross section of
.10 cm . The monoliths obtained had 40 triangular channels
per 1 cm of the cross section. The content of Carulite in each
monolith was 0.060.07 g.
An air mixture containing 2.52 vol.% ÑÍ4 was used for
methane oxidation. Experiments were carried out at an atmo-
methods do not allow the quantitative comparison of
6
activities. In addition, the reaction volumes of mono-
lith and granulated catalysts differ so strongly that their
activities cannot be compared when experiments are
carried out under identical conditions.
7
The authors compared the adsorption properties of
CuZSM-5 zeolite and the related monolith catalyst
using the TPD. To compare the catalytic properties of
these catalysts, the activation energy was used that was
determined in the kinetic and internal-diffusion re-
gimes. Catalytic activity was measured in a flow-type
reactor with a vibrofluidized bed catalyst on different
fractions of grains obtained by grinding of the starting
monolith catalyst. Comparison of activities of the grains
and monolith fragments using reaction rate con-
2
4
2
Published in Russian in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 9, pp. 15121515, September, 2001.
066-5285/01/5009-1589 $25.00 ©ꢀ2001 Plenum Publishing Corporation
1