Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
RSC Advances
Communication
homogeneous distribution of the PdCu nanoparticles on lms
In addition, the enhanced electrocatalytic performance may
of PDDA-GN/PMo12. The onset potential of CO-stripping nega- be owing to the superior electric conductivities of the polymer-
tively shis 110 mV on the PdCu@PDDA-GN/PMo12 modied modied graphene (PDDA-GN) in the multilayer lms,21 which
electrode, compared with the commercial Pd/C, indicating the can be proven by Nyquist plots of the electrochemical imped-
enhanced CO tolerance ability. For one thing, the strength of Pd ance spectrum (EIS) (Fig. 4d). The impedance measurements
and Cu interactions is great strong so as to weak the adsorption were made with frequencies ranging from 0.01 Hz to 105 Hz and
of inhibiting reaction intermediates (i.e. COads) on catalyst an amplitude voltage of 0.1 V. The impedance data can be tted
surface.18 For another, the benecial role of HPMo12 for CO by an equivalent electrical circuit composed by one series circuit
further electro-oxidation and release of surface active sites by of a resistance (Rct) and capacitor (Cd) in parallel.22 Usually, the
CO removal.19
high-frequency semicircle diameter is equal to the charge-
The electrochemical stability of the PdCu@PDDA-GN/PMo12 transfer resistance (Rct), which is resulted from the charge
was also investigated in 0.5 M H2SO4 containing formic acid at transfer process at the interface of electrode/electrolyte.23 As
an applied potential of 0.2 V for 3600 s (Fig. 4b). The polariza- shown in Fig. 4d, Rct markedly decreases with the introduction
tion currents on the PdCu@PDDA-GN/PMo12 modied elec- of PDDA-GN/PMo12 into multilayer lms. This means that
trode decrease within 1000 s and then decay quite slowly to polymer-modied graphene helps enhance electrons transfer
approach a limiting current (up to 3600 s). The initial currents obviously on the electrode interface. At the same time, with the
drop quickly for the PdCu@PDDA-GN/PMo12, probably due to preparation of LBL and electro-deposition, electrons transfer
the formation of the intermediate species during formic acid faster on the smooth and thin lms than on the rough surface
oxidation reaction.20 Moreover, the corresponding limiting of Pd/C through dropping on an electrode.
currents decrease to 31.53 mA mgꢂ1 Pd up to 3600 s, which is
In this work, a simple and facile approach was developed for
much higher than the commercial Pd/C (15.65 mA mgꢂ1 Pd) preparation of the PdCu@PDDA-GN/PMo12, with the assistance
catalysts under the same conditions. The activity results of Pd of Cu to obtain the better electrocatalytic activity and extended
with the same conditions are also lower than PdCu@PDDA-GN/ durability, using PDDA-GN as an electron carrier and PMo12 as a
PMo12 (ESI, Fig. S4†). The improved catalytic activity and better promoter to convert COads to CO2 more simply. The as-prepared
stability of the PdCu@PDDA-GN/PMo12 was further conrmed PdCu@PDDA-GN/PMo12 exhibits a signicant effect on the
by cyclic voltammetry. The catalytic current density keeps enhanced electrocatalytic activity, the improved tolerance of CO
almost constant within 100 cycles. With the peak current and better stability for formic acid oxidation. This work
density of the 5th cycle in the forward sweep as a reference, the provides a promising strategy to fabricate graphene-supported
peak current density of the PdCu@PDDA-GN/PMo12 remains and Pd-based alloy electrocatalysts for efficient fuel cell
about 92% of its original value aer 100 cycles. From Fig. 4b and applications.
c, the PdCu@PDDA-GN/PMo12 is conspicuously better than
commercial Pd/C at electrocatalytic activity and better stability
for formic acid oxidation.
Acknowledgements
This work was nancially supported by NSFC (No. 21171037).
Notes and references
1 G. L. Soloveichik, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 2014, 5, 1399.
2 (a) C. W. Liu, Y. C. Wei, C. C. Liu and K. W. Wang, J. Mater.
Chem., 2012, 22, 4641; (b) N. Tian, Z. Y. Zhou, S. G. Sun,
Y. Ding and Z. L. Wang, Science, 2007, 316, 732.
3 R. Zhang, H. Liu, B. Wang and L. Ling, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012,
116, 22266.
4 J. F. Zhang, Y. Xu and B. Zhang, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50,
13451.
5 (a) J. W. Chen, Y. J. Li, Z. C. Gao, G. Wang, J. Tian, C. P. Jiang,
S. F. Zhu and R. L. Wang, Electrochem. Commun., 2013, 37,
24; (b) S. J. Li, D. J. Cheng, X. G. Qiu and D. P. Cao,
Electrochim. Acta, 2014, 143, 44; (c) M. A. Matin, J. H. Jang
and Y. U. Kwon, J. Power Sources, 2014, 262, 356.
6 C. G. Hu, X. Q. Zhai, Y. Zhao, K. Bian, J. Zhang, L. T. Qu,
H. M. Zhang and H. X. Luo, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 2768.
7 (a) C. Xu, Y. Liu, J. Wang, H. Geng and H. Qiu, J. Power
Sources, 2012, 199, 124; (b) A. K. Singh and Q. Xu,
ChemCatChem, 2013, 5, 652.
Fig. 4 (inset a) CO-stripping voltammograms and (a) magnified area
enclosed by a green square of different electrocatalysts in 0.5 M H2SO4
solution with a scan rate of 50 mV sꢂ1. (b) Chronoamperometric curves
of different electrocatalysts in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution containing 1 M
HCOOH at 0.2 V for 3600 s. (c) Positive-going cyclic voltammograms
of different electrocatalysts in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution containing 1 M
HCOOH with a scan rate of 50 mV sꢂ1. (d) Nyquist plots of different
electrocatalysts in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution.
8 (a) Y. S. Feng, J. J. Ma, Y. M. Kang and H. J. Xu, Tetrahedron,
2014, 70, 6100; (b) J. Saleem, P. Gao, J. Barford and G. Mckay,
64536 | RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 64534–64537
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015