Y. Mao, et al.
ChemicalPhysics529(2020)110556
better performance for the photodegradation of methyl orange (MO).
The enhanced photocatalytic activities might be ascribed to the porous
structures providing a much larger surface areas that more oxygen (O2)
would be adsorbed, the great number of Ag nanoparticles on the sur-
faces of the Ag porous nanoplates might be another reason responsible
for the high photocatalytic activities. The SERS of thiophenol (TP)
molecules adsorbed on the substrates of nanoplates-A and nanoplates-B
were also conducted. The TP molecules can be detected at the con-
centration of 5*10−7 M with the substrate of smooth nanoplates-A, as a
contrast, the TP molecules can be detected at the concentration of
1*10−10 M with the substrate of nanoplates-B. The “hot spots” is the
key factor for nanoplates-B with a lower limiting of detection (LOD)
[26], their porous surfaces and decorated Ag nanoparticles will gen-
nanoplate shape can be well retained at 350 °C as long as the thermal
treatment temperature was set below 350 °C.
2.4. Instrumentation and characterizations
The images of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were collected
on a field-emission SEM (Hitachi S-4700, operated at 15 kV under high
vacuum) equipped with EDX. The images of transmission electron mi-
croscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM are obtained on a TEM
(Tecnai G20) and field-emission TEM machine, respectively. The crys-
tallographic and compositional information was obtained using powder
X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical X‘Pert-Pro MPD, operated at 40 kV
and 40 mA) with monochromatic Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) and
selected area electron diffraction (SAED, integrated in TEM). The X-ray
photoelectron spectra (XPS) were recorded using an ESCALab220i-XL
electron spectrometer from VG Scientific with 300 W Al Kα radiation.
The UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were collected in
200–700 nm using UV-3600 (Shimadzu).
2. Experimental section
2.1. Chemicals and materials
2.5. Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange
Zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, ≥99.0%) was purchased
from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Silver nitrate (AgNO3, ≥99.8%)
was obtained from Shanghai Lingfeng Chemical Reagent Co.
Thiophenol (TP, 98%) was purchased from Matrix Scientific Trade Co.
Methyl orange (MO, ≥99.5%) was purchased from Adamas Reagent
Co., Ltd. All the reagents were analytical reagent (AR) and used as re-
ceived without further purification. The deionized (DI) water was
purified by the Laboratory Water Purification System which was pur-
chased from Shanghai Hitech Instruments Co.
Photocatalytic activity experiments of the synthesized pure ZnO, the
nanoplates-A/ZnO and the nanoplates-B/ZnO were examined with MO
dye as the detective molecules under Xenon lamp (1.2 A). We dispersed
sixty milligrams of the sample within a 60 mL MO dye solution with a
concentration of 4*10−5 M in a 250 mL quartz beaker. The MO dye
with samples was continuously stirred in the dark without any irra-
diation for 30 min to build the adsorption-desorption equilibrium of the
MO dye on the surface of the sample before the photocatalytic activity
test. The xenon lamp were as optical resource and at a given time in-
terval, 4 mL of MO-sample suspension was withdraw and analyzed after
centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 5 min to remove the sample powders,
then the absorbance spectra of the centrifuged solutions were recorded
through UV–vis spectrometer. As comparisons, the photocatalytic ac-
tivities of the pure ZnO, the nanoplates-A/ZnO and the nanoplates-B/
ZnO were measured using the same parameters in ultraviolet–visible
light region, the nanoplates-B/ZnO and the nanoplates-A/ZnO were
also measured using the same parameters in visible light region.
2.2. Preparation of Ag-Ag2O smooth nanoplates (nanoplates-A)
The nanoplates-A were prepared by a photochemical method with
slight modifications from our recently published paper [25]. Typically,
the ZnO films covered by aliquots of AgNO3 aqueous solution (con-
centration: 1–8 M) was illuminated continuously with a UV lamp (wa-
velength: 365 nm) for 180 min. The samples were rinsed with plenty of
deionized water at the end of UV illumination. Obvious color change
from white to dark gray was observed, suggesting the growth of out-of-
substrate Ag-Ag2O nanoplate arrays on the ZnO film.
2.6. Measurement of SERS activity
2.3. Preparation of Ag nanoparticles-decorated porous nanoplates
(nanoplates-B)
The pure TP sample was dissolved by ethanol with different con-
centration. At the beginning of experiments, we prepared adequate
samples under two conditions. For samples of nanoplates-A, 2 mL of TP
solutions with varied concentrations from 1.0 × 10−3 mol/L to
1.0 × 10−6 mol/L were added to 5 mL of culture dish with the samples
of nanoplates-A. After 3 h, the TP solutions were completely adsorbed,
then lightly washed with ethanol and dried in desiccators. As for the
nanoplates-B, we used similar methods and only changed varying
concentration from 1.0 × 10−3 mol/L to 5.0 × 10−11 mol/L. Raman
tests were conducted at room temperature with 632.8 nm laser as ex-
citation source, about an area of 2 μm diameter was probed with a long
50 × objective lens, the acquisition time was 10 s and the incident
power was 1.4 mW.
To prepare the nanoplates-B, the photochemically prepared nano-
plates-A were subjected to programmed thermal treatments in oven
(Box Furnace, Thermal Fisher Scientific, USA) for different periods. The
thermal treatment includes two stages. The temperature was firstly
risen up from the room temperature (~20 °C) to 200 °C for 1 h and then
stayed at 200 °C for another 4 h.
During thermal treatments, the heating process was strictly con-
trolled. In a typically rapid heating condition, the temperature was
risen up to 200 °C within 15 min. On the other hand, in the slow heating
condition, the temperature was risen up to 200 °C within 2 h.
The slow heating condition will result in the Ag porous nanoplates
with “clean” surfaces; while the rapid heating condition will result in
the nanoplates-B. And a color change from dark gray to silver gray was
observed after the thermal treatments.
3. Results and discussion
The thermal treatments at the temperature above 200 °C will lead to
the decomposition of Ag2O and yielding the nanoplates-B. As a result,
the initially generated Ag-Ag2O nanoplates with smooth surfaces were
converted into the Ag nanoplates with porous surfaces due to the re-
lease of oxygen. On the other hand, the appearance of nanoparticles on
the surfaces of the nanoplates might also be ascribed to the structural
contraction from Ag2O (with the density of 7.143 g/cm3) to Ag (with
the density of 10.490 g/cm3) during the thermal treatments. While Ag-
Ag2O smooth nanoplates were converted into Ag porous nanoplates, the
The Ag-Ag2O composite nanoplates were produced by the later-by-
layer crystallization mechanism under long-time (180 min) UV illumi-
nation [25]. As shown in Fig. 1A, there were high-density nanoplates
(Fig. 1B). Fig. 1C shows that the nanoplates are generated with smooth
patterns (Fig. 1D). As seen, besides the diffraction peaks of the ZnO
substrate, there are also the diffraction peaks of both Ag and Ag2O
observed, indicating the generation of Ag-Ag2O composite nanoplates.
2