658
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 59, No. 3, March, 2010
Zeyfman and Sterlin
Table 1. Yields of ethers 3 obtained by the
thermolysis of salts 1
Experimental
F NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 200SY instruꢀ
ment (188.3 MHz) in a ССl4 solution (CF3COOH as external
standard).
19
Salt 1
Yield of comꢀ
pound 3 (%)
R
M
2ꢀ(2,2,2ꢀTrifluoroethoxy)tetrafluoropropionic acid (2b).
HFPO (16.6 g, 0.1 mol) was introduced gradually with stirring
into a mixture of trifluoroethanol (19.3 g, 0.19 mol), KOH (19 g,
0.34 mol), water (40 mL), ether (50 mL), and Bu4NBr (1.5 g),
maintaining the temperature of the reaction mixture <30 °C.
Then the mixture was stirred for 1 h more at ~20 °C, and 30%
HCl was added to acidic pH. The ethereal layer was separated
and dried with MgSO4, and the fraction with b.p. 82—92 °C
(35 Torr) was isolated by distillation. The repeated distillaꢀ
tion gave 16 g of compound 2b, b.p. 61—63 °C (10 Torr), 68%
yield (based on HFPO taken in the reaction) (cf. Ref. 3: b.p.
125—127 °С). 1F NMR, δ: –3.3 (3 F(1)); 4.0 (3 F(3)); 54.5 (1 F(2).
Et
Na
K
Na
K
0*
10
4*
67
63
CF3CH2
Ph
K
* See Ref. 3.
of the αꢀfluorine atom increases in the series of salts
1c ≈ 1b << 1a. As shown by the thermolysis of these salts
(see Scheme 1), the yields of trifluorovinyl ethers 3 deꢀ
crease in the same sequence (Table 1).
The concept about the influence of the ionic radius
of the cation on the yield of trifluorovinyl ethers (the
ionic radii for Na+, K+, and Cs+ at the coordination numꢀ
ber six are8 0.95, 1.33, and 1.69 Å, respectively) makes
it possible to explain the described3 increase in the yield
of ether 3d (R = Me) during the thermolysis of salts 1
with R = Me in the series of cations Na+, K+, and Cs+
(Scheme 2).
2ꢀPhenoxytetrafluoropropionic acid (2c) was obtained analoꢀ
gously from HFPO and phenol in 40% yield, b.p. 93—98 °C
(3 Torr). 1F NMR, δ: 5.2 (3 F); 42.5 (1 F). Without further
purification acid 2c was transformed into potassium salt 1c, pyꢀ
rolysis of which is described below.
Ethyl trifluorovinyl ether (3a) was synthesized by the pyrolyꢀ
sis of potassium salt 1a in 10% yield; b.p. and the 1F NMR
spectrum coincide with the published values9 (acid 2a was synꢀ
thesized by the earlier described method5).
2,2,2ꢀTrifluoroethyltrifluorovinyl ether (3b). A solution of acid
2b (16 g, 0.065 mol) in МеОН was neutralized with a solution of
KOH in МеОН (using phenolphthalein as indicator) and evapꢀ
orated in vacuo, and the residue was dried over Р2О5 at 110 °С
(2—3 Torr), divided, and mixed with dry sand (20 g), and subꢀ
jected to pyrolysis at 10—15 Torr heating with a burner (or in the
bath with Wood´s alloy at 225—280 °С). Volatiles were collected
in a trap (–78 °C), and the condensate was distilled to obtain
ether 3b (8.5 g, 67%), b.p. 41—44 °С (b.p. and the 1F NMR
spectrum are identical to the described values3,10).
Scheme 2
Phenyl trifluorovinyl ether (3c). A mixture of potassium salt
1c (10.4 g, 0.037 mol) (the salt was preꢀdried over Р2О5 at
110—115 °C and 3 Torr) and dry sand (13 g) was subjected to
thermolysis in an oily pump vacuum, collecting the pyrolyzate in
a trap (–78 °C). The distillation of the condensate gave ether 3c
(5.9 g, 63%), b.p. 132—134 °C (b.p. and the 1F NMR spectrum
are identical to the described values11,12).
In the case of the smallest Na+ ion, only the fiveꢀ
membered transition state is formed in which the nucꢀ
leophilic substitution of the αꢀfluorine atom occurs
with the electrophilic assistance of Na+; no ether 3d is
formed. The formation of ether 3d (26 and 20% yields)
upon the thermolysis of the potassium and cesium salts,
whose ionic radii are substantially larger, indicates a tenꢀ
dency to form the sixꢀmembered transition state, although
the low yields of trifluorovinyl ether show that the reꢀ
action course is determined, to a great extent, by the
anionoid mobility of the αꢀfluorine atom and the formaꢀ
tion of αꢀlactone remains the predominant direction
of thermolysis.
The authors are grateful to the DuPont Company for
financial support.
References
1. M. Hudlicky, Chemistry of Organic Fluorine Compounds, 2nd
ed., Halsted Press—Wiley, New York, 1967, p. 498.
2. J. D. LaZerte, L. J. Hals, T. S. Reid, G. H. Smith, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1953, 75, 4525.
3. M. Y. Pellerite, J. Fluor. Chem., 1990, 49, 43.
4. P. R. Resnick, US Pat 3692843 (1972); Chem. Abstrs, 1973,
78, 6323q.