Table 2 H–T dimer selective oxidative coupling reaction of
3-substituted thiophenes (1)
Scheme 2 Biaryl coupling reaction of 3-hexylthiophene with mesitylene.
a
1
R
b
Yield (%) Product
Entry
Substrate
In summary, we have developed an unprecedented oxidative
coupling reaction of alkyl thiophenes selectively leading to the
corresponding H–T dimer of 2,29-bithiophenes by choosing a
suitable Lewis acid and hypervalent iodine(III) reagent. This is the
first example for controlling the selectivity of the oxidative biaryl
coupling reaction products. It is postulated that the end-free 2,29-
bithiophenes could be easily functionalized at these end-free sites as
well as being converted to the corresponding high-quality oligo-
and poly-thiophenes. Therefore, the present reaction provides a
novel direct route to various 2,29-bithiophenes. Further applica-
tions of these products are currently under way in our laboratory.
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (S) and for Encouragement of Young Scientists from the
Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan. H. T.
also thanks the Industrial Technology Research Grant Program
from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development
Organization (NEDO) of Japan.
c
1
1a
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
1h
1i
1j
n-Hexyl
n-Hexyl
n-Heptyl
n-Octyl
Methyl
n-Butyl
Isobutyl
41
2a + 3a (94:6)
d
2
3
4
72 (90)
52
30
72
88
2a + 3a (81:19)
2b + 3b (92:8)
2c + 3c (95:5)
2d + 3d (80:20)
2e + 3e (77:23)
2f + 3f (87:13)
2h + 3h (90:10)
2i + 3i (82:18)
2j + 3j (1:99)
b
c
5
6
7
98
c
8
Cyclohexyl 67
9
(CH
2
)
6
Br
62
46
10
SiMe
3
a
The molar ratio of 1, 4d and TMSOTf is 3:1:2. Isolated yield
based on consumed 4a,d. 4a was used instead of 4d. Isolated yield
based on consumed 1a.
c
d
yields of the products, while higher selectivities were generally
observed (Table 2, entries 7 and 8). The bromo group of 2i may
be useful for further functionalization of these dimers (Table 2,
13
entry 9). On the other hand, 3-trimethylsilylthiophene 1j selec-
tively gave the H–H dimer 3j rather than the H–T dimer 2j
Toshifumi Dohi, Koji Morimoto, Yorito Kiyono, Akinobu Maruyama,
Hirofumi Tohma and Yasuyuki Kita*
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University,
1-6 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
E-mail: kita@phs.osaka-u.ac.jp; Fax: +81-6-6879-8229;
Tel: +81-6-6879-8225
(
Table 2, entry 10). This is probably due to the electronic character
of the silyl group.
A plausible reaction mechanism is as follows (Scheme 1): cation
radical B is initially formed from 1 with 4d-Lewis acid via the
1
4
CT-complex A during the reaction. The radical B is thought
15
to be confined in the coordination sphere of iodine(III). Then, B
reacts with a neutral molecule of 1 followed by the one-electron
oxidation and deprotonation to give a mixture of the H–T dimer 2
and H–H dimer 3.
Notes and references
{ Typical experimental procedure is as follows: TMSOTf (0.36 mL,
2.0 mmol) and PIFA (430 mg, 1.0 mmol) were sequentially added to a
stirred solution of 3-hexylthiophene (1a) (0.5 g, 3.0 mmol) in CH Cl
2 2
The selectivities of products are determined in the last step.
The selective couplings of the 2-position of the cation radical
intermediate B and the 5-position of 1 accounts for the formation
of the observed H–T linked 2,29-bithiophene products. The
following experiment and our previous results on the function-
(
2.5 mL) at 278 uC under a nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was stirred
for 3 h under the same reaction condition. An aqueous work-up with
saturated NaHCO at 0 uC followed by column chromatography (SiO /
3
2
n-hexane) gave the corresponding 2,29-bithiophenes 2a and 3a in 41% yield.
Identification and isolation of the two regioisomers, H–T and H–H, were
11
performed by a previously reported procedure.
16
alization of thiophenes support this explanation. Thus, during
the biaryl coupling reaction of 3-hexylthiophene 1a and mesitylene,
the C–C bond formation preferentially occurred at the 2-position
of 3-hexylthiophene (Scheme 2).
1
Recent reviews, see: (a) J. Roncali, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 711; (b)
Electronic Materials: The Oligomer Approach, ed. K. M u¨ llen and
G. Wegner, Wiley-VCH, Verlag GmbH, 1998; (c) R. D. McCullough,
Adv. Mater., 1998, 10, 93; (d) R. L. Elsenbaumer, K.-Y. Jen,
G. G. Miller, H. Eckhardt, L. W. Shacklette and R. Jow, Electronic
Properties of Conjugated Polymers, ed. H, Kuzmany, M. Mehring and
S. Roth, Springer Series in Solid State Sciences, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,
1987, vol, 76, p. 400; (e) N. J. L. Guernion and W. Hayes, Curr. Org.
Chem., 2004, 8, 637.
2
3
4
Pre-treatment with strong bases: (a) J. Kagan and S. K. Arora,
Heterocycles, 1983, 20, 1937; (b) H. Higuchi, T. Nakayama, H. Koyama,
J. Ojima, T. Wada and H. Sasabe, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1995, 68, 2363,
and references cited therein.
Transition metal-catalyzed coupling of thienyl halide: (a) J. M. Tour,
Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 537; (b) J. Hassan, M. S e´ vignon, C. Gozzi,
E. Schulz and M. Lemaire, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 1359, and references
cited therein.
Palladium-catalyzed direct homocoupling of thiophene: (a) T. Itahara,
M. Hashimoto and H. Yumisashi, Synthesis, 1984, 255; (b) K. Masui,
H. Ikegami and A. Mori, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 5074.
Scheme 1 Reaction mechanism.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005
Chem. Commun., 2005, 2930–2932 | 2931