LETTER
Novel Diels–Alder Approach To Heavily Substituted Azasugars
2343
significantly lowers the chemical shifts of the protons at case of reduction of 10, there are no steric encumbrance to
endo positions. Indeed, the chemical shifts for H-7 and H- either face of the imine and therefore, the reducing agent
8 protons in the assigned endo product are at 4.74 ppm and is introduced from either face. Interestingly, close analy-
4.78 ppm whereas the chemical shifts for H-7 and H-8 sis of the NMR of compounds 14a and 14b revealed no
protons in the assigned exo product are at 4.51 ppm. Fur- fine W coupling between H-6 and H-7. The absence of
ther evidence of the endo configuration of the major cy- this W coupling supports the proposed exo configuration
cloadduct was obtained after the next step.
of the starting material.
Hydride reduction of the imine functionality of the endo As before, methanolysis of 14a and 14b followed by basic
bridged ester 9 selectively gave amine 11. The stereo- hydrolysis of the two isomers gave azasugars 15a and 15b
chemistry of the reduction is based on our earlier observa- (Scheme 7).
tions during hydrogenolysis of the structurally related
compound 4.18 The lower face of the imine is sterically en-
cumbered by the carbonate bridge and therefore, the re-
ducing agent is introduced from the lactone bridge face
(Scheme 5). Furthermore, close analysis of the NMR of
compound 11 revealed a fine coupling (1.3 Hz) between
H-6 and H-7. This W coupling, is also a feature of reduc-
tion of cycloadducts of 2H-pyran-2-ones and is observed,
for instance, in compound 5 (Scheme 2). The presence of
this W coupling strongly supports the proposed configu-
ration of the reduction product.
O
OH
Me
Me
OH
O
HO
O
i, ii
HN
Me
Me
O
HO2C
N
Me
Me H
15ab
O
14ab
Scheme 7 i) MeONa (1 equiv), MeOH, reflux, 30 min;
ii) 2 M NaOH, r.t., 30 min (51%)
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that azasugars can
be prepared with control of relative stereochemistry via
the Diels–Alder cycloaddition of an appropriately substi-
tuted 1,4-oxazin-2-one with vinylene carbonate followed
by the chemical manipulation of the bridged bicyclic lac-
tone cycloadduct. We are currently working to expand the
scope of this novel methodology and to synthesise other
azasugars.
O
O
OH
Me
Me
Me
OH
O
O
HO
i
ii
HN
Me
N
7
6
RO2C
iii
N
Me H
Me
O
O
Me
Me
O
O
Me
O
O
R = Me 12
R = H 13
9
11
Scheme 5 i) HOAc, NaBH(OAc)3, r.t., 24 h (67%); ii) MeONa (1
equiv), MeOH, reflux, 30 min (49%); iii) 2 M NaOH, r.t., 1 h (quant.)
Acknowledgement
We thank Oxford GlycoSciences Ltd. (now part of Celltech R&D
Ltd.) for financial support.
Basic aqueous hydrolysis of the amine 11 was not effi-
cient, however, methanolysis of 11 to methyl ester 12 fol-
lowed by basic hydrolysis of compound 12 gave a very
good yield of azasugar 13.
References
(1) (a) Compain, P.; Martin, O. R. Bioorg Med. Chem. 2001, 9,
3077. (b) Watson, A. A.; Fleet, G. W. J.; Asano, N.;
Molyneux, R. J.; Nash, R. J. Phytochemistry 2001, 56, 265.
(c) Asano, N.; Nash, R. J.; Molyneux, R. J.; Fleet, G. W. J.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 1645. (d) Picasso, S.
Chimia 1996, 50, 648.
(2) Cox, T.; Lachmann, R.; Hollak, C.; Aerts, J.; van Weely, S.;
Hrebicek, M.; Platt, F.; Butters, T.; Dwek, R.; Moyses, C.;
Gow, I.; Elstein, D.; Zimran, A. Lancet. 2000, 355, 1481.
(3) Lindsay, K. B.; Pyne, S. G. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7774.
(4) (a) Desire, J.; Dransfield, P. J.; Gore, P. M.; Shipman, M.
Synlett 2001, 1329. (b) Banba, Y.; Abe, C.; Nemoto, H.;
Kato, A.; Adachi, I.; Takahata, H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2001, 12, 817. (c) Degiorgis, F.; Lombardo, M.; Trombini,
C. Synthesis 1997, 1243.
In contrast to the stereoselective reduction of imine 9, hy-
dride reduction of the imine functionality of the exo
bridged ester 10 gave a mixture of two amines 14a and
14b in a 3:1 ratio which could not be separated
(Scheme 6). The lack of selectivity in the reduction of 10
is again consistent with our previous observations that exo
cycloadducts of 2H-pyran-2-ones undergo non-stereose-
lective hydrogenation of their alkene function.18 In the
O
O
O
Me
Me
Me
O
O
O
O
O
i
O
N
HN
+
HN
Me
(5) (a) Somfai, P.; Marchand, P.; Torsell, S.; Lindstrom, U. M.
Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 1293. (b) O’Brien, J. L.; Tosin, M.;
Murphy, P. V. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3353.
Me
O
O
O
6
6 Me
Me
7
7
Me
O
O
O
14b
10
14a
Me
(6) Scott, L. J.; Spencer, C. M. Drugs 2000, 59, 521.
(7) Knapp, S.; Zhao, D. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4037.
(8) Garcia-Moreno, M. I.; Benito, J. M.; Mellet, C. O.;
Fernandez, J. M. G. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7604.
Scheme 6 i) HOAc, NaBH(OAc)3, r.t., 24 h (79%)
Synlett 2003, No. 15, 2341–2344 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York