Table 1. Orthoamide Overman Rearrangement of 19a
Scheme 3. Selective Formation of Cyclic Orthoamide 19
yield (%)
entry
additive
none
15
19
1
17
8
0
54
43
27
2
K2CO3
3
4b
BHT (100 mol %)
BHT (5 mol %)
19
56
a Conditions: 50 μmol of 19, t-BuPh, 180 °C in a sealed tube. b 406
μmol of 19 were used.
be stereoselectively synthesized by the orthoamide Over-
man rearrangement of Z-allylic 1,2-diol 16 derived from
L-tartrate.4
We then turned our attention to the construction of the
polyhydroxy pyrrolidine unit (Scheme 4). Prior to the cycli-
zation, we installed three secondary alcohols (C3, C4, C10).
The allylic alcohol in 15 was protected as a MOM ether to
give 20. Because the next dihydroxylation with achiral
OsO4 resulted in the undesired diasteroselectivity, 20 was
treated under Sharpless’ asymmetric conditions15 (dr = 3:1),
followed by recrystallization to furnish diol 21 in 61%
isolated yield. After benzyl protection and MPM depro-
tection, the C10 alcohol was stereoselectively established by
chelation-controlled Hosomi-Sakurai allylation.16 Namely,
Swern oxidation of primary alcohol 22 provided the alde-
hyde, which was treated with allyl trimethylsilane and
The synthesis of broussonetine F began with selective
formation of the cyclic orthoamide from allylic 1,2-diol 16,
which was prepared from diethyl L-tartrate (17) by a known
procedure (Scheme 3).4 To render our two novel sigma-
tropic rearrangements useful, flexible conditions to form
either bisimidate 18 or cyclic orthoamide 19 from the
common allylic 1,2-diol 16 are required. After an extensive
survey, we found that the amount of DBU and CCl3CN
and the order of addition were crucial. When excess CCl3-
CN (8 equiv) was added to a solution of 16, DBU (1 equiv),
and CH2Cl2, bisimidate 18 was selectively generated.3c,d,10
On the other hand, addition of a catalytic amount of DBU
(0.1 equiv) to a solution of 16, CCl3CN (1.3 equiv), and
CH2Cl2 resulted in the selective formation of cyclic orthoa-
mide 19 (dr = 1:1), along with a trace amount of bisimi-
date 18.
MgBr2 Et2O to afford 23 as a single diastereomer. The
resulting hydroxy group of 23 was protected as the benzyl
3
(10) The sequential Overman rearrangement of bistrichloroimidate
18 provided bistrichloroacetamide i in 92% yield.
With cyclic orthoamide 19in hand, the stage was now set
for the pivotal orthoamide Overman rearrangement (Table 1).
A solution of cyclic orthoamide 19 and tert-butylbenzene
was heated at 180 °C for 1 d in a sealed tube, giving allylic
amino alcohol 15 in 17% yield (entry 1).11 Because a
prolonged reaction time caused severe decomposition, we
next surveyed the effect of additives. Although K2CO3 did
not improve the yield (entry 2),12 we found that 2,6-di-tert-
butylhydroxytoluene (BHT) suppressed the rate of decom-
position to give 15 in 19% yield, together with recovery of
43% of 19 (entry 3).13,14 The amount of BHT was critical,
and 5 mol % of BHT gave the best results to afford 15 in
56% yield (77% yield brsm, entry 4). The reaction pro-
ceeded with complete chirality transfer probably through
a chairlike transition state,2 with 15 isolated as a single
diastereomer.
(11) Overman rearrangement of MOM-protected trichloroacetoimi-
date ii, which was synthesized from 16 in four steps, proceeded at lower
temperature and much faster than the orthoamide version. As Da-
nishefsky reported in ref 5b, we also observed that two diastereomers
of orthoamide 19 underwent equilibration at room temperature.
(12) Nishikawa, T.; Asai, M.; Ohyabu, N.; Isobe, M. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 188–192.
ꢁ
(13) Ammenn, J.; Altmann, K.-H.; Bellus, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1997,
(9) For selected reviews on B-alkyl Suzuki-Miyaura coupling, see:
(a) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457–2483. (b) Chemler,
S. R.; Trauner, D.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40,
4544–4568. (c) Kotha, S.; Lahiri, K.; Kashinath, D. Tetrahedron 2002, 58,
9633–9695. (d) Sasaki, M.; Fuwa, H. Synlett 2004, 11, 1851–1874. (e)
Nicolaou, K. C.; Bulger, P. G.; Sarlah, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
4442–4489. (f) Molander, G. A.; Ellis, N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 275–
286. (g) Doucet, H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 2013–2030.
80, 1589–1606.
(14) We believe that BHT might suppress the decomposition path-
way via a radical species.
(15) (a) Becker, H.; Soler, M. A.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron 1995,
51, 1345–1376. (b) Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B.
Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2483–2547.
(16) Hosomi, A.; Sakurai, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 16, 1295–1298.
618
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 4, 2011