3
Table 2. IC50 value of normal cells and cancer cell lines, cLog P, and the specificity of the synthesized compounds.
Compound
No
HEK293 A549 A498 HeLa A375 HepG2
Specificity*
cLog P**
IC50 (µM)
A549 A498 HeLa A375 HepG2
3
4
8
9
10
11
12
13
18
19
20
21
0.335
1.665
0.632
0.632
0.598
1.643
0.657
1.551
0.365
1.711
1.810
0.340
0.022
0.134 0.067 0.134 0.067
0.533 0.533 0.533 0.533
0.126 0.126 0.126 0.126
0.253 0.126 0.506 0.506
0.120 0.030 0.060 0.060
0.526 0.526 0.263 0.526
0.263 0.526 0.066 0.263
0.248 0.248 0.248 0.496
0.146 0.729 2.334 0.146
0.137 0.274 0.068 0.274
0.145 0.145 0.579 0.579
0.136 0.136 0.068 0.068
0.022 0.022 0.022 0.022
0.134
0.533
0.126
0.253
0.060
0.263
0.263
0.496
0.029
0.068
0.290
0.136
0.022
2.5
3.125
5.0
2.5
5.0
3.125
2.5
6.3
5.0
3.1
5.0
5.0
20.0
3.1
1.3
6.3
0.5
6.3
2.5
5.0
2.5
3.125
5.0
3.21
3.23
3.36
4.74
3,36
4.74
3.52
4.90
2.57
3.95
2.73
4.11
0.94
3.125 3.125
5.0
5.0
1.25
10.0
1.25
10.0
6.25 3.125
10.0 2.5
6.25 3.125
2.5
10.0
6.25
2.5
3.125
12.5
25.0
6.25
2.5
2.5
0.156
25.0
2.5
6.25
12.5
12.5
2.5
12.5 3.125 3.125
2.5
1.0
5.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
Methotrexate
1.0
1.0
HEK293, human embryonic kidney cells; A549, human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cells; A498, human renal cancer cells; HeLa, human cervical cancer cells;
A375, human skin malignant melanoma cells; HepG2, Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines.
* Specificity of the compounds: the ratio for each compound of its IC50 value for normal cells (HEK293) to its IC50 value for the cancer cell.
**cLogP value of the synthesized compounds (calculated from ChemBioDrawUltra 12.0.3)
To assess the specificity of the compounds, their toxicity was
tested against normal cells using human embryonic kidney cells
(HEK 293). The specificity of the compounds was calculated as
their IC50 values for normal cells divided by their IC50 values for
the specific cancer cells, according to Eq. 1. The specificity of
the compounds appeared to be cell-dependent with good
specificity toward HepG2 cells but a relatively moderate
specificity toward other cancer cells. Table 2 shows the
specificity of all 12 compounds toward normal cells and cancer
cells.
and the amount of live cells was lower than that observed with
the compounds. The anti-proliferative activity of all the tested
compounds increased as the exposure time was extended, as
proven by the decline in the number of surviving cells. After a
longer exposure, all tested compounds had an activity equal to
that of MTX.
The synthesized compounds were methoxy- or hydroxyl-
substituted analogs of chalcone with varying components:
fluorine atoms, ketone groups, or alkyl chains. Accordingly, a
structure–activity relationship (SAR) was established by
comparing the anti-proliferative activities of the different
chalcone groups. Among these compounds, 3, 8–10, 18, and 19
exhibited the most potent anti-proliferative activity. In contrast,
compounds 4, 11–13, 20, and 21 with semi-saturated or
saturated linkers showed the weakest anti-proliferative activity
against all the tested cancer cells except HeLa and A375. The
resulting data is presented in Table 2 and shows that all the
tested compounds generally had significant activity against
cancer cell lines with 0.029–0.729 µM. The most active agent
against the HepG2 cells was 18, 0.029 µM. Hydroxy-substituted
compounds (18–21) displayed improved anti-proliferative
activity against the A549, HeLa, and A375 cancer cells. In
addition, the saturated chalcone derivatives (11–13, 20, and 21)
did not significantly improve the activities against the cancer
cell lines except for the A549 cancer cell line. The fluoro-
substituted compounds (8–13 and 18–21) exhibited improved
anti-proliferative activity against almost all cancer cell lines
compared with MTX and the non-fluoro compounds (3 and 4).
On the other hand, non-fluoro-substituted chalcone 3 exhibited
moderate anti-proliferative activity (0.067 µM) against the
A375 and A498 cell lines compared with all fluoro-substituted
compounds except 10.
The non-toxic concentrations of all compounds were
determined on the HEK-293 cell line. Then, anti-proliferative
activity studies were performed at these non-toxic
concentrations. The compounds with the best selectivity values
for each cancer cell line are shown in Table 3. The selected
compounds and MTX were exposed for a period of 0–96 h for
each cancer cell line. At the end of the incubation, all cells were
evaluated and subjected to an assessment of their cytotoxic
responses using an MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-
diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay (Figure 2).15,16
Table 3. The compounds with the best selectivity values and
non-toxic concentrations for each cancer cell line.
Cancer cell
line
The highest selective
Non-toxic
concentration (μg/mL)
compound
A549
A498
HeLa
A375
19 and 20
0.16 and 0.08
0.02
10
19
10
19
0.16
0.02
0.16
The mono fluoro substituted compounds showed activity
toward A549 and HepG2. However, considering the difluoro-
substituted compounds, 10 exhibited activity toward A549,
A498, HeLa and A375 whereas compound 19 showed activity
toward HeLa and HepG2. Compared with all tested cell lines,
the difluoro-substituted compounds exhibited high anti-
proliferative activity toward HeLa cell lines, as indicated in
Table 2.
HepG2
As shown in Figure 2, the proliferation of cancer cells
treated with a non-toxic and in lower concentration dose of
compounds and MTX was inhibited in a time-dependent
manner. After a short treatment (24 h), MTX was more effective