A R T I C L E S
Warren and Mayer
-
Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) has an ascorbate binding pocket
similar for the potassium 18-crown-6 salt of ascorbate (AscH )
46
+
that is well characterized. It contains several hydrogen bonding
interactions (e.g., Lys30, Arg172, and the heme-propionate),
and is fairly exposed to solvent. This pocket thus appears to
hold ascorbate in an environment closer to that of aqueous
solution, with a high bond strength (high one-electron/one-proton
and the more soluble DBU-H -isopropylidene ascorbate
(iAscH ). Addition of water up to 1-3 mol % causes decreases
-
-
by factors of 2-7 in k
1
and almost 4-20 in K
1
. For AscH , the
at only 1.2 mol % water is a quarter of
4.5-fold decrease in K
1
the total change from pure MeCN to pure water. Other
hydrogen-bond-donating additives such as glycerol, choline
chloride, and N-acetyl-leucine-methyl ester have similar effects.
On the other hand, the hydrogen bond acceptors DME and
DMSO do not significantly affect the reaction outside of normal
kinetic solvent effects. Thus, the changes in rate and equilibrium
constants are much larger than can be explained by changes in
bulk solvent properties such as the dielectric constant or ionic
strength. In addition, since the changes in k and Keq are due to
hydrogen bond donors but not acceptors, this effect is clearly
distinct from Ingold’s kinetic solvent effect model for hydrogen
atom transfer reactions.
The changes in rate constant directly parallel the changes in
equilibrium constant, with Brønsted plots, ln(k) vs ln(K), being
linear with slopes close to the theoretical value of 0.5 (0.48 for
AscH and 0.61 for iAscH ). Therefore, the changes in rate
are predominantly a consequence of the changes in the driving
force for the reactions. This contrasts with previously described
kinetic solvent effects in oxyl radical reactions, which are purely
kinetic effects due to hydrogen bonding to the transferring
hydrogen atom. The results show that ascorbate is a stronger
reductantsbetter able to donate a proton and an electron (or
+
-
redox potential). The aqueous 1H /1e ascorbate potential is
8
II/III
0
.33 V at pH 7, somewhat above the outer-sphere Fe
47
potential of the heme in APX of +0.206 V. Since the catalytic
48
cycle of APX requires an iron(III) resting state, it is important
that the bound ascorbate not be any more reducing than aqueous
ascorbate. Thus, the enzyme has apparently evolved to have a
strongly hydrogen-bond-donating binding site for ascorbate to
avoid reduction of the resting ferric state.
The ascorbate reduction of the R-tocopheroxyl radical, to give
the ascorbyl radical and R-tocopherol (vitamin E), is perhaps
one of the most discussed and studied reactions of ascorbate.
4
9,50
This simple HAT reaction in Vitro is very well documented,
5
1
though its in ViVo importance is debated. R-Tocopherol is
membrane bound, likely with its phenolic moiety near the
49
-
-
water-lipid interface. Conversely, ascorbate is hydrophilic and
does not significantly partition into lipids, although there is
evidence that it can localize in the polar lipid headgroups at
the surface of the membrane. This membrane surface region
is polar but less hydrated and contains fewer H-bond donors
than the cellular bulk (Figure 6b). On the basis of our results,
ascorbate at the surface of the membrane is predicted to act as
a stronger H-atom donor (reductant) to tocopheroxyl radical than
ascorbate in aqueous solution. In addition, the O-H bond in
R-tocopherol should be a little stronger in the polar headgroup
region than in the bulk lipid. Thus, the “intermediate” region
at lipid-water interfaces appears to be an ideal location for
Nature to maximize the driving force for, and therefore the rate
5
2
5
3
•
4,7,8
H ) sin local environments with fewer hydrogen bond
donors. The change in reducing power of ascorbate is also
indicated by the change in bond strength (BDFE) in pure
solvents (Table 1). The unusually large solvation/binding effect
of ascorbate is suggested to derive from the substantial differ-
ences in charge distribution between ascorbate and the more
delocalized ascorbyl radical. This study also indicates that the
reactivity of ascorbate can, in many cases, be best understood
5
4
5
5
-
of, H-transfer from AscH to R-tocopheroxyl. Rapid reduction
of R-tocopheroxyl is valuable to minimize its activity as a pro-
5
6
oxidant.
using the free energy for loss of both a proton and an electron
•
(
H ).
Conclusions
The tuning of the properties of ascorbate by its local
environment is likely to be of importance in many of the
biological actions of ascorbate. Polar, protic environments favor
ascorbate, while environments without hydrogen bond donors
favor the ascorbyl radical. Three examples illustrate different
ways in which Nature may have utilized this unique property,
to facilitate ascorbate recycling by cytochrome b561, to avoid
unwanted side effects in ascorbate peroxidase, and in the
regeneration of R-tocopherol by ascorbate. As new reactivity
and structural information emerges about ascorbate-utilizing
proteins, specific hydrogen bonding interactions should be
considered with respect to the reactivity of the enzyme.
Rate and equilibrium constants for the oxidation of ascorbate
by the aminoxyl radical TEMPO (eq 1) in acetonitrile are very
sensitive to small amounts of various additives. The results are
(
(
46) Sharp, K. H.; Mewies, M.; Moody, P. C. E.; Raven, E. L. Nat. Struct.
Biol. 2003, 10, 303–307.
47) Efimov, I.; Papadopoulou, N. D.; McLean, K. J.; Badyal, S. K.;
Macdonald, I. K.; Munro, A. W.; Moody, P. C. E.; Raven, E. L.
Biochemistry 2007, 46, 8017–8023.
(
(
(
48) Raven, E. L. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2003, 20, 367–381.
49) Burton, G. W.; Ingold, K. U. Acc. Chem. Res. 1986, 19, 194–201.
50) May, J. M.; Qu, Z.; Mendiratta, S. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1998,
3
49, 281–289.
(
(
(
(
51) Hamilton, I. T. J.; Gilmore, W. S.; Benzie, I. F. F.; Mulholland, C. W.;
Strain, J. J. Br. J. Nutr. 2000, 84, 261–267.
Methods
52) Crans, D. C.; Baruah, B.; Gaidamauskas, E.; Lemons, B. G.; Lorenz,
B. B.; Johnson, M. D. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2008, 102, 1334–1347.
53) Nagle, J. F.; Tristram-Nagle, S. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1469,
Physical Techniques and Instrumentation. UV/vis stopped-
flow measurements were obtained using an OLIS RSM-1000
1
59–195.
1
instrument. H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance
54) This prediction assumes that R-tocopherol is not affected by H-bond
donors in the same unusual way that ascorbate is and that the
R-tocopherol BDFE is not unusually shifted by local solvation. This
assumption is supported by the BDFE data in the Supporting
Information and by reports of similar solvent effects on R-tocopherol
and phenol reactions in a variety of solvents: Valgimigli, L.; Banks,
J. T.; Ingold, K. U.; Lusztyk, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9966–
3
00 or 500 MHz spectrometer. All reactions were performed in
the absence of air using standard glovebox and high-vacuum
techniques.
Materials. Reagent-grade solvents were purchased from Fischer
Scientific, unless otherwise noted. All other chemicals were
purchased from Aldrich. Anhydrous acetonitrile was purchased from
Honeywell Burdick and Jackson, sparged with Ar, and plumbed
9
971.
(
(
55) In general, homolytic bond strengths increase from nonpolar to polar
media. This is in part due to changes in the free energy of solvation
directly into a N
2
-filled glovebox with stainless steel tubing. The
•
supplier specification for water content in the MeCN is 5 ppm (ꢀwater
of H (see Supporting Information).
-5
56) Bowry, V. W.; Stocker, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6029–6044.
) 1.5 × 10 M); our independent measurement by Karl Fischer
7
792 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 132, NO. 22, 2010