SCHEME 1
Sim p le Dia ster eoselectivity on Ad d ition of
r-Ha loa lk yl Gr ign a r d Rea gen ts to
Ben za ld eh yd e
Volker Schulze, Peter G. Nell, Andrew Burton, and
Reinhard W. Hoffmann*
Fachbereich Chemie der Philipps-Universita¨t Marburg,
Hans Meerwein Str. D-35032 Marburg, Germany
rwho@chemie.uni-marburg.de
Received J anuary 31, 2003
SCHEME 2
Abstr a ct: The addition of R-haloalkyl Grignard reagents
to benzaldehyde occurs with simple diastereoselectivity
substantially higher than that of the corresponding lithium
reagents. Reaction in the presence of dimethyl-aluminum
chloride suppresses subsequent Oppenauer oxidation of the
resulting Mg-alkoxides by excess benzaldehyde.
The addition of a chiral organolithium compound (1)
to an aldehyde is a stereogenic carbon-carbon bond
forming reaction. Two diastereomeric products, syn-2 and
anti-2, are generated, which could be used to prepare
stereodefined epoxides 3 and 4 (Scheme 1).This approach
to epoxides is hardly used, because simple diastereose-
lectivity1 i.e., the ratio between syn-2 and anti-22 is low.3,4
Seebach, when studying the reaction of 5 with benzal-
dehyde, showed5-7 that a change from an organolithium
compound 5a to the corresponding organomagnesium
compound 5b led to high syn/anti selectivity in the
formation of 6 (Scheme 2).We therefore surmised that a
transmetalation of 1 to the corresponding magnesium
reagents8 could lead to higher and, hence, useful levels
of diastereoselectivities on addition to aldehydes. We
report here on the simple diastereoselectivity on addition
of chiral R-haloalkyl-magnesium reagents 7-9 to ben-
zaldehyde. These reactions had actually been studied
with a different objective.9-12 Here we focus on the
attendant simple diastereoselectivity. The reagents 7-9
were generated from the 1-halo-1-iodo-2-phenyl-ethane
in an iodine/lithium or iodine/magnesium exchange reac-
tion using n-butyllithium or isopropyl-magnesium chlo-
ride,9,10 or by a sulfoxide/magnesium exchange reaction
from R-haloalkyl sulfoxides and ethyl-magnesium chlo-
ride.11 Depending on the workup procedure, halohydrins
derived from 2 or epoxides 3 and 4 were obtained and
analyzed for diastereomer composition by NMR spectros-
copy. The simple diastereoselectivities recorded for the
addition of the R-haloalkyl-metal reagents 7-9 to ben-
zaldehyde are compiled in Table 1.
The data in the table show that a marked increase in
simple diastereoselectivity results on going from the
organolithium to the organomagnesium reagents 7 and
8. Moreover, high simple diastereoselectivity has been
recorded for the addition of the Grignard reagents 9 and
10 to benzaldehyde. The presence of Me2AlCl or of a
bisoxazoline ligand has only small (beneficial) effects on
simple diastereoselectivity.
(1) Heathcock, C. H. In Asymmetric Synthesis; Morrison, J . D., Ed.;
Academic Press: New York, 1984; Vol. 3; pp 111-212.
(2) A major part of this chemistry had been explored before the
advent of high-field NMR spectroscopy. Hence, reactions that led to
diastereomer mixtures had been avoided or diastereomer ratios have
not been determined.
It has been suggested by Gawley7 that organolithium
and organomagnesium reagents react with benzaldehyde
by different reaction mechanisms: Grignard reagents are
postulated to add in a concerted polar process with a late
transition state, which favors significant stereodifferen-
tiation14 in the formation of the products. In the reaction
of the more basic organolithium compounds SET may
precede carbon-carbon bond formation, which then
occurs with an early transition state by combination of
a radical pair. Stereodifferentiation is accordingly low.
(3) For
a review, see: Hoppe, D. In Houben-Weyl, Methods of
Organic Synthesis; Helmchen, G., Hoffmann, R. W., Mulzer, J .,
Schaumann, E., Eds.; G. Thieme: Stuttgart, 1995; Vol. E21b; pp 1341-
1347.
(4) For further examples of diastereogenic addition of R-hetero-
substituted organolithium compounds to aldehydes: R-nitrogen-
substituted cases, see ref 20; R-oxygen-substituted cases, see refs 21
and 22; R-sulphur-substituted cases, see ref 23; R-selenium-substituted
cases, see ref 24; for unexpected high diastereoselectivities in these
reactions see refs 22 and 25.
(5) (a) Seebach, D.; Syfrig, M. A. Angew. Chem. 1984, 96, 235-236;
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 248. (b) Seebach, D.; Hansen,
J .; Seiler, P.; Gromek, J . M. J . Organomet. Chem. 1985, 285, 1-13. (c)
Seebach D.; Huber, I. M. P.; Syfrig, M. A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1987, 70,
1357-1379. These findings on the system 5 have since been substanti-
ated by others.
(6) (a) Rein, K. S.; Gawley, R. E. J . Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 1564-
1569. (b) Zhang, P.; Gawley, R. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 2945-
2948. (c) Gawley, R. E.; Zhang, P. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8103-8112.
(7) Rein, K. S.; Chen, Z.-H.; Perumal, P. T.; Echegoyen, L.; Gawley,
R. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 1941-1944.
(8) The beneficial effect of transmetalation from lithium to magne-
sium on simple diastereoselectivity in the addition to aldehydes has
been noted on several occasions.26-30
(9) Mu¨ller, M.; Stiasny, H.-C.; Bro¨nstrup, M.; Burton, A.; Hoffmann,
R. W. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 731-736.
(10) Schulze, V.; Hoffmann, R. W. Chem. Eur. J . 1999, 5, 337-344.
(11) Hoffmann, R. W.; Nell, P.; Leo, R.; Harms, K. Chem. Eur. J .
2000, 6, 3359-3365.
(12) Nell, P. G. New. J . Chem. 1999, 23, 973-975.
(13) Ko¨brich, G.; Trapp, H. Chem. Ber. 1966, 99, 670-679.
(14) Bassindale, A. R.; Ellis, R. J .; Lau, J . C. Y.; Taylor, P. G. J .
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1986, 98-100.
10.1021/jo034138m CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 05/02/2003
4546
J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4546-4548