4340 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 61, No. 13, 1996
Ramachandran et al.
halogen bond (Table 2). The mechanism that would be
more consistent with the observed results may be the
concerted E2-like mechanism in which decarboxylation
and debromination occur in a single step via an imine-
like transition state as suggested by Hand and Margerum
in N-chloroamino acids.5 In the activated state carbon-
nitrogen bond formation and C-COO- bond fission may
occur to a large extent while the change in the nitrogen-
halogen bond would be relatively small. Since the -I
effects of Cl and Br are almost equal (as measured from
the σ* values),15 one cannot expect much energy differ-
ence between the activated states of N-chloro- and
N-bromoamino acids. Since the bonded halogen atom
would be solvated appreciably,5 the change in the degree
of solvation of halogen, as it gains (partial) negative
charge, is negligible. Thus, the contribution for ∆Sq from
the N-Cl and N-Br bonds is almost identical. This will
explain why the ∆Sq values for N-chloro- and N-bro-
moalanine are identical.
The influence of substituents on the stability of sub-
stituted imines may be same as that of the stability of
olefins.16 Thus, the transition state with highly substi-
tuted imines may be more stable and more reactive.
Each methyl substitution at the amino carbon increases
the unimolecular decomposition of N-chloroamino acids5
by a factor of ∼60. The similar trend may hold true for
N-bromoamino acid also. This will explain why N-
bromoglycine disintegrates very slowly while the N-bromo-
R-amino isobutyric acid decomposes rapidly.
For unimolecular decomposition, the halogen element
effect (k1Br/k1Cl) is calculated for alanine and N-meth-
ylgycine and the values are 3.6 and 7.6,17 respectively.
Thus, the halogen atom effect is more pronounced in
N-substituted amino acid. Comparison of the results for
glycine and N-methylglycine in Table 5 indicates that the
methyl substitution at the amino nitrogen enhances the
fragmentation through the unimolecular process. These
two observations indicate that the mechanism of unimo-
lecular fragmentation of N-bromo-N-methylglycine may
be different from other N-bromoamino acids. Some
authors7,18 have suggested the formation of nitrenium ion
as an alternative for the E2-like unimolecular mechanism
in N-chloroamino acids. Therefore, N-bromo-N-methyl-
glycine may disintegrate through the formation of a
nitrenium ion intermediate which would be stabilized by
the electron-donating methyl group. Moreover, a nitre-
nium ion would be expected to yield substitution and/or
elimination products. This will explain why the major
reaction product in sarcosine is glyoxalic acid rather than
formaldehyde.
N-Bromoglycine and to a smaller extent (∼30-40%)
other N-bromoamino acids disintegrate through the
hydroxide ion- and R-amino acid anion-catalyzed mech-
anism. We can suggest a E2 mechanism for the base-
catalyzed reaction in which the R-hydrogen and bromine
atom would be in an antiperiplanar configuration, thereby
eliminating hydrogen bromide (Figure 5). The resultant
intermediate R-imino acid may rapidly hydrolize to give
R-carbonyl carboxylate. The large negative entropies of
activation observed for k2 and k3 are also consistent with
the reactions involving E2 elimination of hydrogen halide
from N-chloro compounds.19
F igu r e 5. Mechanistic scheme.
The factors that influence the carbon-heteroatom
multiple bond formation through â-elimination are (i)
lower stability of the heteroatom-leaving group bond and
(ii) increased basicity of â-hydrogen.20 Thus, the observed
variation in the base-catalyzed reaction contants (k2 and
k3) with the structure of amino acid should come from
the relative basicity of the hydrogen atom at the R-car-
bon.
Earlier reports on the oxidation of R-amino acids
suggest that the hydrogen atom at the R-carbon is
slightly acidic and can interact with hydroxide ion.1,14
This interaction is influenced by the substituent R at the
R-carbon, and the observed order14 is H > CH3 > (CH3)2-
CH. Perusal of the k2 values in Table 1 shows that the
observed values are also in the above order. Thus, the
inductive effect (+I) of alkyl substituent R is an impor-
tant factor in the base-catalyzed elimination. A simple
linear free energy relationship (LFER) analysis21 of k2
with Taft’s constant σ* shows a reasonably good correla-
tion (r ) 0.967) even with limited amino acid anions such
as glycine, alanine, and valine. The observed relation-
ship is log k2 ) -0.86 + 0.79σ*. Phenylalanine shows a
positive vertical deviation (to this correlation line), and
this could be assigned to the R effect.22 Similar deviation
is exhibited by phenylalanine in the reaction with N-
bromosuccinimide also.23 Even though great reliance
cannot be placed on the absolute value of the reaction
constant F*, the positive value indicates the presence of
the carbanion character at the R-carbon in the transition
state; i.e., the transition state has appreciable scission
of the C-H bond. We would expect that an electron-
donating/releasing substituent at the R-position (relative
to the halogen) may slightly increase the base-catalyzed
reaction constant k2 or at least should remain the same
as that of the unsubstituted one.24 Comparison of the k2
values of N-bromo-N-methylglycine and N-bromoglycine
shows that the methyl substitution at the nitrogen atom
actually decreases the rate. This means that the electron-
donating/releasing substituent at the nitrogen, i.e., R-po-
sition, probably destabilizes the incipient negative charge
or double bond.25 This is in accordance with the proposed
(18) Armesto, X. L.; Canle, M.; Losada, M.; Santaballa, J . A. Int. J .
Chem. Kinet. 1993, 25, 1.
(19) Bartsch, R. A.; Cho, B. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 3587.
(20) Hine, J . Physical Organic Chemistry; McGraw-Hill: New York,
1962; p 207.
(15) Lange’s Hand Book of Chemistry; Dean, J . A., Ed.; McGraw-
Hill: New York, 1979; Section 3, pp 134-135.
(21) Pavelich, W. A.; Taft, R. W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 4935.
(22) Edwards, J . O.; Pearson, R. G. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 16.
(23) Ramachandran, M. S.; Easwaramoorthy, D.; Rajasingh, V.;
Vivekanandam, T. S. Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn. 1990, 63, 2393.
(24) Reference 16, p 883.
(16) March, J . Advanced Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Wiley East-
ern: New Delhi, 1986; p 889.
Cl
(17) The k1 values at 35 °C are calculated from the data in ref 5.