G. Deka et al. / Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 504 (2018) 40e45
41
and scaled using SCALA of the CCP4 suite [16]. The crystal belonged
to the space group C2 with unit cell parameters of a ¼ 108.31 Å,
ꢀ
b ¼ 46.14 Å, c ¼ 99.28 Å and
b
¼ 100.8 . Although the space group is
the same, the unit cell parameters for the T166A mutant were
different from those of the wild type enzyme (PDB code: 3R0Z) for
ꢀ
which a ¼ 100.02 Å, b ¼ 46.79 Å, c ¼ 100.04 Å and
b
¼ 93.75 .
Scheme 1. The degradation of D-Ser to pyruvate and ammonia by D-Serine deaminase,
a PLP dependent enzyme.
2.4. Structure determination and refinement
The structure of StDSD-T166A mutant was determined by mo-
lecular replacement using Wt-StDSD (PDB code: 3R0Z) as the
phasing model. All hetero atoms and water molecules of the
phasing model were removed to avoid model bias. The solution
obtained by PHASER [17] was first subjected to rigid body refine-
ment and then subjected to positional refinement using Refmac5 of
CCP4 suite [18]. Each cycle of refinement was followed by manual
model building using COOT [19].
not be validated further.
In this manuscript, we present the X-ray crystal structure of an
active site mutant (T166A) of StDSD; representing the first PLP-
bound (holo) form of the enzyme. We have carried out biochemical
studies on the T166A and D236L mutants of DSD to understand the
role of Thr166 and Asp236 in the function of DSD. The structural
features that are important for catalysis are discussed in the light of
these structural and biochemical investigations.
2.5. Spectral studies and activity assays
2
. Materials and methods
Spectral studies were carried out to monitor the formation of
2
.1. Cloning, over-expression and purification of active site mutants
internal aldimine as well as the product pyruvate using a Jasco
UVeVisible V-630 spectrophotometer. 1 mg/ml of protein in 50 mM
HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl buffer were used for the study. The
reactions were initiated by addition of 1 mM of D-Ser and spectra
were recorded in the range of 300e550 nm as a function of time.
The specific activities of the Wt-StDSD as well as the two active
site mutants (T166A and D236L) were estimated using 2,4-
dinitrophenyl hydrazine (DNPH) method by measuring the a-keto
acid released during the reaction as described previously [12]. The
reaction mixture was composed of 50 mM potassium phosphate
The gene for StDSD cloned in pET21b vector was used as the
template for the generation of single site mutants [12]. Two active
site residues Thr166 and Asp236 were targeted for mutagenesis
(
shown in red italics) using single primer extension method [15].
The primers were designed so as to contain a restriction site
shown in green italics) by choosing appropriate degenerate co-
(
dons. The mutants were further confirmed by sequencing.
buffer (pH 7.5), 50
of enzyme.
mM PLP, 100 mM of the substrate D-Ser and 50 ng
3. Results
The two active site mutants of StDSD were over-expressed and
purified using the protocol found suitable for the wild type enzyme
3.1. X-ray crystal structure determination of StDSD-T166A
[
12]. The purified proteins corresponded to a size of 49 kDa when
examined on a 12% SDS-PAGE.
All the diffraction datasets collected for T166A-DSD mutant
crystals contained spots from polycrystalline contaminations
making meaningful data processing very difficult. Only a single data
set collected on a crystal of T166A which contained multiple ice
rings that could be processed (Supplementary Fig. S1) by excluding
the contaminating rings [20]. Because of the ice rings, the quality of
the processed data was low. This is reflected in the data statistics
(Table 1).
The structure of StDSD-T166A was determined by molecular
replacement using the wild type structure as the phasing model
from which all non-protein atoms were removed. The solution
obtained was refined to a final Rwork and Rfree of 28.91% and 34.85%,
respectively, using REFMAC5 of CCP4 suite [18]. The refinement
statistics is listed in Table 2.
2.2. Crystallization of StDSD
The purified proteins were incubated with 0.1% of n-octyl-b-
glucopyranoside prior to setting up crystallization. Initial trials of
crystallization were carried out at 298 K using the hanging drop
method under the conditions found suitable for the wild type
enzyme [12]. Crystals of mutant proteins (T166A and D236L) could
not be obtained under this condition or with small variations of the
condition. Therefore, screening for suitable conditions was carried
out using a number of commercially available screens including
Hampton Crystal screens 1 and 2, Index screens 1 and 2, Jena Basic
screens 1e4 and Jena classic screens 1e10. No hits were obtained
for D236L. However, crystals of T166A were obtained from 20% w/v
polyethylene glycol 4,000, 100 mM MES pH 6.5, 600 mM sodium
chloride (JBscreen classic 3/C2). These crystals were fragile and
difficult to mount. The diffraction data obtained from the best
crystal was used for structural studies.
3.2. Quality of the model
Despite the limited resolution (2.7 Å) and data quality, a model
(residues 2e439) of the mutant protein StDSD-T166A could be built
into the final electron density map with 99.4% of the residues in the
allowed regions of the Ramachandran map and only two residues
2.3. X-ray diffraction data collection
(0.60%) in the disallowed region. Continuous electron density could
A single crystal of StDSD-T166A was mounted on a cryo-loop
and frozen in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction data extending to
.7 Å were recorded using a CCD image plate detector while
maintaining a temperature of 100 K at the BM14 beamline at ESRF,
Grenoble. The data were processed using the program iMOSFLM
be traced for most of the main chain as well as the side chain atoms
with the exception of a few residues (69e73, 212e227 and the C-
terminal hexa-histidine tag) where electron densities were either
missing or fragmented. These residues have not been included in
the final model.
2