Use of in Situ Isopropoxide Protection in the
Metal-Halogen Exchange of Arylboronates
SCHEME 1. Protection of Boronates with Lithium
Qin Jiang, Meagan Ryan, and Paul Zhichkin*
AMRI, 26 Corporate Circle, P.O. Box 15098,
Albany, New York, 12212
SCHEME 2. Synthesis of Functionalized
Isopropoxide protection of arylboronates allowed their use
in metal-halogen exchange reactions. The isopropoxide-
protected borate species were obtained from a boronate or
in situ from dibromoarenes. meta- and para-dibromoarenes
were converted via these intermediates into functionalized
arylboronates in a one-pot manner.
In this Note we disclose a method for effecting a metal-
halogen exchange in halogenated arylboronates, which is free
from the disadvantages of the above two methods. Inexpensive
dibromoarenes or commercially available and easily prepared
bromoarylpinacolatoboronates are employed in our method as
the starting materials. The reaction affords pinacolatoboronates
5
which can be purified by flash chromatography.
Metal-halogen exchange is an important and widely used
method of selective functionalization of organic compounds. It
has been clear since the first unsuccessful attempt by Gilman
in 1958 that a “halogen-metal interconversion in bromosub-
stituted benzeneboronic acids [...] would have provided many
The key to preventing side reactions with the metalating agent
is the reversible protection of the boron atom as an aryltri-
alkoxyborate anion. To the best of our knowledge, this paper
is the first reported case of such protection. The choice of
protecting pinacolatoisopropoxyborate group is important. Pi-
nacolatoboronates are more stable than isopropoxyboronates;
therefore, isopropoxide can be cleaved selectively, avoiding the
1
possibilities for new syntheses.” However, until very recently
there have been no precedents of a successful metal-halogen
exchange employing molecules containing a boronate or boronic
acid moiety. This can be explained by the fact that boronates,
being Lewis acids, actively react with most organometallic
6
scrambling of the ester. For example, p-bromophenylpinaco-
latoboronate (1a) was protected by a reaction with commercially
available lithium isopropoxide to provide anionic species 2a.
The subsequent metal-halogen exchange and quench with
benzaldehyde followed by a standard aqueous workup afforded
the desired product 3a (Scheme 1). This reaction is also
applicable to meta-substituted aryl boronates as illustrated by
conversion of 1b into 3b (Scheme 1). Boronates 1a,b are
2
reagents used in metal-halogen exchange. In 2005, Knochel
established that iodo-substituted aryl boronates could be meta-
3
lated with i-PrMgCl‚LiCl. Although Knochel’s method has a
wide applicability, the substrates are not commercially available
and are prepared from expensive diiodoarenes. In 2006, Molan-
der proposed metalation of readily available potassium bro-
moaryltrifluoroborates with n-BuLi-TMEDA as an alternative
7
commercially available and can also be easily prepared from
the corresponding boronic acids (see the Supporting Informa-
tion). The yield of 3a (78%) and 3b (70%) was similar to the
yield reported by Knochel (83% of 3a and 71% of 3b) starting
with iodophenylboronates. Lower yield (62%) of the trifluo-
4
approach. However, as trifluoroborates are purified by crystal-
lization, his method is applicable only to 1,4-substituted
benzenes. When the products are less crystalline, as in the case
of 1,3-disubstituted benzenes, the purification becomes prob-
lematic.4
(5) (a) Tucker, C. E.; Davidson, J.; Knochel, P. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
3
482. (b) Pereira, S.; Srebnik, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3283.
(6) Pinacolatoboronates have been prepared via hydrolysis of pinacola-
(1) Santucci, L.; Gilman, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 193.
(
2) For example, see: (a) Letsinger, R. L.; Remes, N. J. Am. Chem.
toisopropoxyborate intermediate, for example, see: (a) Hoffmann, R. W.;
Metternich, R.; Lanz, J. W. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1987, 881. (b) Krueger, J.;
Hoffmann, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7499. (c) Mohacrishnan,
A. K.; Hucke, A.; Lyon, M. A.; Lakshmikantham, M. V.; Cava, M. P.
Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 11745. (d) Karsten, M.; Dimichele, L.; Mills, P.;
Frantz, D. E.; Nelson, T. D.; Kress, M. H. Synlett 2006, 1948.
Soc. 1955, 77, 2489. (b) Letsinger, R. L.; Skoog, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1
1
1
955, 77, 2491. (c) Brown, H. C.; Cole, T. E.; Srebnik, M. Organometallics
985, 4, 1788. (d) Brown, H. C.; Srebnik, M.; Cole, T. E. Organometallics
986, 5, 2300.
(
(
3) Baron, O.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3133.
4) Molander, G. A.; Ellis, N. M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7491.
(7) Combi-Blocks: 1a (cat. no. PN-2629) and 1b (cat. no. PN-2655).
10.1021/jo0710329 CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
6
618
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6618-6620
Published on Web 07/26/2007