A R T I C L E S
Auernheimer et al.
For the second set of peptides (5-7), N-acryloylglycine,20 N-acryloyl-
δ-amino valeric acid,21 and N-acryloyl-ꢀ-amino hexanoic acid were
preactivated with HATU/HOAt/collidine for acylation of 4-(4-ami-
nophenyl)azobenzoic acid.
Coating. Twenty microliter solutions of peptides 1-7 in 2-propanol/
DMSO were placed on PMMA disks (Palacos R, 1 cm)ssix for each
peptidesfollowed by irradiation at 254 nm for 2 h. After standing
overnight in the dark, every disk was rinsed with 2 mL of PBS buffer
of cyclic peptides, and the effects of light-switched conforma-
tional preferences on the binding affinities to integrin have been
21
analyzed.14
15
Surface-immobilized photoswitchable 4-arylazopyridine and
1
6
azobenzene can be used to form self-assembled monolayers
SAMs) on gold surfaces and Langmuir-Blodgett films (LB
(
films) on glass and silicon. Thereby, it was shown that surface-
positioned photoisomerizable substances retain their light-
responsiveness. In the dark, at equilibrium, azobenzene is
predominantly in the more stable E form, and its switching
kinetics was found to be altered by immobilization, but both
diastereomers could be generated by irradiation with appropriate
(pH 6.0) to remove uncoated peptide. Three disks from every peptide
were irradiated at 450 nm for 3 h and stored for 5 days in the dark to
ensure that thermal equilibrium is reached even on bound material.
The other three disks were irradiated at 366 nm for 12 h directly before
seeding with cells. All disks were transferred to cell culture plates (48
wells).
Cell Adhesion Assay. The cell adhesion assays were performed as
described by Landegren.22 MC3T3 E1 mouse osteoblasts were seeded
on the BSA blocked substrate at a density of 50 000 cells per well.
The cells were allowed to adhere for 1 h under standard tissue culture
wavelengths of light. On the other hand, previous studies from
our laboratory and others17 clearly revealed that cell adhesion
on different surfaces depends on the spacer length applied
between the ligand peptide and the surface. From these
experiments, it was compelling to analyze the effect of photo-
responsive units in the spacer for anchoring cyclic RGD peptides
to surfaces with the working assumption that a shorter spacer
would not mediate cell adhesion whereas a longer one would
do it. If such concept is realized, photolithographic structuring
of surfaces in cell adhesive and cell repulsive areas would
become possible.
2
conditions (37 °C, 5% CO ) in serum-free culture medium (DMEM)
containing 1% BSA (w/v). The wells were washed three times with
PBS (pH 7.4) to remove nonadherent cells. Attached cells were
quantified by an ELISA detection of the activity of the lysosomal
enzyme hexosaminidase. p-Nitrophenol-N-acetyl-â-D-glucosaminide
was cleaved by the enzyme, and the amount of colored p-nitrophenol
was measured with an ELISA reader (Dynatech Laboratories, MRX)
at 405 nm. Results are given as the percentage of the total number of
cells seeded (which is considered as 100% of cell adhesion). In all
experiments, the mean value of each point given in the figures is the
result of triplicates; the error bars represent standard deviations.
Materials and Methods
Peptide Synthesis. The cyclic pentapeptide cyclo(-RGDfK-) was
4
b,17d
synthesized as described previously
and coupled in solution to the
spacer/anchor construct with HATU/HOAt/collidine. In one set of
peptides (1-4), the azobenzene moiety was placed near the anchor
group and thus in proximity of the solid surface, while in a second set
Results and Discussion
For this study, 4-[(4-aminophenyl)azo]benzoic acid was
chosen as the light switch as it was shown to retain all typical
properties of azobenzene derivatives in terms of photoisomer-
(
5-7), it was grafted directly to the cyclic RGD peptide. Correspond-
18,19
ingly, for compounds 1-4, 4-(4-aminophenyl)azobenzoic acid
was
acylated with acryloyl chloride and then C-terminally elongated by
coupling to glycine, γ-amino butyric acid, and ꢀ-amino hexanoic acid
attached to TCP-resin with TBTU/HOBt/DIEA.
13c
ization and photostability.
As known for this and other
azobenzene derivatives, at thermodynamic equilibrium in the
dark, the E isomer, which is about 3 Å longer than the Z isomer,
is obtained in almost quantitative yield. It can be switched to
the Z form by irradiation with light at 360 nm, but at the
photostationary equilibrium, conversion to the Z isomer proceeds
(
13) (a) Ulysse, L.; Cubillos, J.; Chmielewski, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
8
466-8467. (b) Renner, C.; Behrendt, R.; Sp o¨ rlein, S.; Wachtveitl, J.;
Moroder, L. Biopolymers 2000, 54, 489-500. (c) Renner, C.; Cramer, J.;
Behrendt, R.; Moroder, L. Biopolymers 2000, 54, 501-514. (d) Pieroni,
O.; Fissi, A.; Angelini, N.; Lenci, F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 9-17. (e)
Cattani-Scholz, A.; Renner, C.; Cabrele, C.; Behrendt, R.; Oesterhelt, D.;
Moroder, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 289-292. (f) Sp o¨ rlein, S.;
Carstens, H.; Satzger, H.; Renner, C.; Behrendt, R.; Moroder, L.; Tavan,
P.; Zinth, W.; Wachtveitl, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 7998-
7
only with yields of about 70-90%. Therefore, in cell adhesion
assays, the lack of 100% E isomer has to be taken into account.
However, if the density of RGD is relatively low, the depletion
of RGD peptides which are exposed to be recognized by the
integrins can switch the recognition from “binding” to essentially
“no stimulated binding”. It is known from our previous studies
that cells need oligomeric binding with a maximum distance of
8
002. (g) Hugel, T.; Holland, N. B.; Cattani, A.; Moroder, L.; Seitz, M.;
Gaub, H. E. Science 2002, 296, 1103-1106. (h) Bredenbeck, J.; Helbing,
J.; Sieg, A.; Schrader, T.; Zinth, W.; Renner, C.; Behrendt, R.; Moroder,
L.; Wachtveitl, J.; Hamm, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 6452-
6
457. (i) Renner, C.; Kusebauch, U.; L o¨ weneck, M.; Milbradt, A. G.;
Moroder, L. J. Pept. Res. 2005, 65, 4-14.
2
3
(
14) (a) Milbradt, A. G.; L o¨ weneck, M.; Krupka, S. S.; Reif, M.; Sinner, E.-K.;
Moroder, L.; Renner, C. Biopolymers 2005, 77, 304-13. (b) Sch u¨ tt, M.;
Krupka, S. S.; Milbradt, A. G.; Deindl, S.; Sinner, E.-K.; Oesterhelt, D.;
Renner, C.; Moroder, L. Chem. Biol. 2003, 10, 487-490.
about 65 nm between RGD peptides.
An acrylamide anchor on PMMA was chosen for im-
mobilization of the cyclo(-RGDfK-), as the influence of spacer
length on the integrin-mediated cell adhesion is already known
(
15) Cook, M. J.; Nygård, A.-M.; Wang, Z.; Russell, D. A. Chem. Commun.
2
002, 1056-1057.
17d
(
16) (a) Evans, S. D.; Johnson, S. R.; Ringsdorf, H.; Williams, L. M.; Wolf, H.
Langmuir 1998, 14, 6436-6440. (b) Walter, D. G.; Champbell, D. J.;
Mirkin, C. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 402-405. (c) Tamada, K.;
Akiyama, H.; Wei, T. X. Langmuir 2002, 18, 5239-5246. (d) Sidorenko,
A.; Houphouet-Boigny, C.; Villavicencio, O.; McGrath, D. V.; Tsukruk,
V. V. Thin Solid Films 2002, 410, 147-158.
for this system. For an effective spacer, two ꢀ-amino hexanoic
acids (Ahx) and an acrylamide as anchor was required, which
corresponds to a length of 1.7 nm (distance between both
external carbonyl carbon atoms), while the acryloyl-Ahx spacer
with 0.9 nm length was found to be too short to mediate cell
adhesion. Taking this information into account, a set of peptide
constructs was designed (Figure 1) containing the photoswit-
(
17) (a) Beer, J. H.; Springer, K. T.; Coller, B. S. Blood 1992, 79, 117-128.
(b) Craig, W. S.; Cheng, S.; Mullen, D. G.; Blevitt, J.; Pierschbacher, M.
D. Biopolymers 1995, 37, 157-175. (c) Kantlehner, M.; Finsinger, D.;
Meyer, J.; Schaffner, P.; Jonczyk, A.; Diefenbach, B.; Nies, B.; Kessler,
H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 560-562. (d) Kantlehner, M.;
Schaffner, P.; Finsinger, D.; Meyer, J.; Jonczyk, A.; Diefenbach, B.; Nies,
B.; H o¨ lzemann, G.; Goodman, S. L.; Kessler, H. ChemBioChem 2000, 1,
(20) Korte, F.; St o¨ riko, K. Chem. Ber. 1960, 93, 1033-1042.
(21) Pless, D. D.; Lee, Y. C.; Roseman, S.; Schnaar, R. L. J. Biol. Chem. 1983,
258, 2340-2349.
(22) Landegren, U. J. Immunol. Methods 1984, 67, 379-388.
(23) Arnold, M.; Cavalcanti-Adam, E. A.; Glass, G.; Bl u¨ mmel, J.; Eck, W.;
Kantlehner, M.; Kessler, H.; Spatz, J. ChemPhysChem 2004, 5, 383-388.
1
07-114.
(
18) Sch u¨ ndeh u¨ tte, K. H. In Houben-Weyl; Thieme Verlag: Stuttgart, 1965;
Vol. 10/3, p 340.
(
19) Behrendt, R.; Schenk, M.; Musiol, H.-J.; Moroder, L. J. Pept. Sci. 1999,
5
, 519-529.
16108 J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 127, NO. 46, 2005