3812
J. Lazaar et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 3811–3813
THF (15 mL) at À78 °C under argon. The mixture
OLi
1. nBuLi (1 equiv.)
LTMP (3 equiv.)
THF, -78°C
O
O
was stirred for 30 min at the same temperature before
dried acetone (3 mL) was added dropwise. After
30 min at À78 °C, the mixture was allowed to reach rt
before hydrolysis with water (0.5 mL). After removal
of the solvents under reduced pressure, EtOH (30 mL),
H2SO4 (2 mL, 96%) and glacial AcOH (3 mL) were
added to the crude material and the resulting solution
was heated at reflux for 3 h. EtOH and AcOH were then
removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
dissolved in EtOH (30 mL). Caesium carbonate (2.1 g,
6.6 mmol) and CH3I (3 mL) were added and the mixture
was stirred for 48 h at rt. After evaporation of the
solvents under reduced pressure, hot CH2Cl2 (10 mL)
was added and the resulting solution was filtered. The
organic phase was dried over Na2SO4. After concentra-
tion, the crude material was chromatographed on a sil-
ica gel column using CH2Cl2/MeOH (9:1) as eluent to
give cerpegin (1, 2.1 g, 71%) as a beige solid.18
H2SO4 / AcOH
OH
OLi
OMe
EtOH, ∆, 3h
O
2.
N
OMe
N
3
2
Cs2CO3 (2 equiv.)
CH3I (15 equiv.)
O
O
Cerpegin
EtOH, rt, 24h
N
H
O
4
O
O
O
O
N
Br
N
Cl
6
5
Scheme 1. ÔOne-potÕ four-step synthesis of 1.
halopyridolactones 5 and 6 result from surprising direct
substitution of the methoxy group by the halide.17
References and notes
1. Sivakumar, K.; Eswaramurthy, S.; Sabramanian, K.;
Natarajan, S. Acta Crystallogr. 1990, C46, 839–841.
2. (a) Adibatti, N. A.; Thirugnanasambantham, P.; Kuilo-
thungan, C.; Viswanathan, S.; Kameswean, L.; Bala-
krishna, K.; Sukumar, E. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 2449–
2450; (b) Sukumar, E.; Gopal, R. H.; Rao, R. B.;
Viswanathan, S.; Thirugnanasambantham, P.; Vijayasek-
aran, V. Fitoterapia 1995, 66, 403–406.
3. Guillier, F.; Nivoliers, F.; Bourguignon, J.; Dupas, G.;
´
Marsais, F.; Godard, A.; Queguiner, G. Tetrahedron Lett.
1992, 33, 7355–7356.
4. Kelly, T. R.; Walsh, J. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 6657–
6658.
In order to counter the formation of the halopyridolac-
tone we decided to use the non-nucleophilic strong acid
H2SO4. We observed in this case by H NMR spectro-
1
scopy monitoring the total conversion of dilithium salt
3 to the desired lactopyridone 4 a 3 h reflux period.
Faced with the difficulty to extract the lactopyridone 4
from ethanol, it was decided to simply remove the sol-
vent and acetic acid under reduced pressure, and to finish
cerpegin synthesis before purification. This was effected
by adding to the residue an excess of methyl iodide and
caesium carbonate, the latter allowing neutralization of
residual H2SO4 and catalyzing the methylation of the
nitrogen atom.7 Cerpegin (1) was then isolated after re-
moval of the solvent, extraction and purification by flash
chromatography in 71% overall yield.
5. (a) Maisuo, K.; Arase, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1995, 43,
2091–2094; (b) Maisuo, K.; Arase, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1994, 42, 715–717.
6. Hong, H.; Comins, D. L. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 391–
392.
In conclusion, as in three of the previously described
syntheses of cerpegin, our strategy utilizes lithiation as
key step. However, unlike our first synthesis3 and that
of Kelly and Walsh,4 the method we here described
avoids masking the lithium carboxylic group since the
lithium carboxylate was directly used as a directed met-
allation group. Starting with 2-methoxypyridine and
employing as key step a Ôone-potÕ dilithiation of the pyr-
idine ring at C3 then C4 positions, the CominsÕ synthesis
stays certainly the most elegant strategy based upon
directed lithiation of pyridine but it suffers from a
modest 38% overall yield. Our present Ôone-potÕ synthe-
sis of cerpegin from commercially available 2-meth-
oxynicotinic acid is a really improved way towards
cerpegin, as efficient as the VilleminÕs Ôone-potÕ judicious
procedure, which is based upon a condensation of eth-
oxycarbonyl-a,b-insaturated-c-lactone with triazine
leading directly to cerpegin skeleton.7
7. Villemin, D.; Liao, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8733–
8734.
8. Matsuo, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Sugimoto, K.-I. Heterocycles
1997, 45, 1191–1195.
9. Tarasov, E. V.; Henckens, A.; Ceulemans, E.; Dehaen, W.
Synlett 2000, 625–626.
10. Sarkar, T. K.; Basak, S. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2925–
2927.
´
11. (a) Mongin, F.; Trecourt, F.; Queguiner, G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1999, 40, 5483–5486; (b) Lazaar, J.; Rebstock, A.-S.;
´
´
Mongin, F.; Godard, A.; Trecourt, F.; Marsais, F.;
Queguiner, G. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 6723–6728.
´
12. These conditions were successful for 2-chloronicotinic
acid; see Ref. 11.
13. After the dilithium salts 3 were hydrolyzed by adding water
(0.5 mL), THF was removed under reduced pressure. A
2 M aqueous solution of HCl (0.5 mL), AcOH (5 mL) and
EtOH (10 mL) were then added to the crude material and
the resulting solution was heated at reflux for 3 h.
1
14. Spectral data of 5: H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): 8.58 (s,
1H, H6), 7.34 (s, 1H, H5), 1.62 (s, 6H, 2Me); m/z (EI): 197–
Typical one-pot four-step synthesis of cerpegin 1: 2-
Methoxynicotinic acid (2, 0.5 g, 3.2 mmol) was added
to a solution of BuLi (5.2 mL, 2.5 M in hexane) and
2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (1.2 mL, 9.8 mmol) in
199 (70%), 182–184 (100%).
15. Spectral data of 6: H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO): 7.83 (d,
1
1H, H6, J = 5.3 Hz), 6.80 (d, 1H, H5, J = 5.3 Hz), 1.41 (s,
6H, 2Me); m/z (EI): 241–243 (10%), 226–228 (100%).