F(000) = 1616, T = 293(2) K, 19 172 reflections collected, 6977 unique with
˚
Table 1 Bond lengths (A) in the C
free ligand and two complexes
b
LN
b
–N
a
(H)–C
a
LO moiety of the
[
R
int = 0.0263], R1[I . 2s(I)] = 0.0575, final (for all data) R1 = 0.0815,
wR2 0.1392, GOF 1.187; Complex 2, CCDC 646864:
27 4 11
C H23Cu N O4.5, orthorhombic, space group Pcca, M = 827.72, a =
=
=
4-Hpcih
1
2
3
˚ ˚ ˚ ˚
1.9969(15) A, b = 7.3578(5) A, c = 20.3447(14) A, V = 3292.8(4) A , Z = 4,
3
calcd = 1.670 g cm , F(000) = 1656, T = 293(2) K, 20 812 reflections
2
r
2
C
C
N
a
LO/C
LN /C
–N
a
–O
1.2117(18)
1.355(2)
1.3765(17)
1.265(2)
1.223(5)/1.229(5)
1.331(5)/1.331(5)
1.383(4)/1.378(4)
1.279(5)/1.280(5)
1.281(4)
1.305(4)
1.390(4)
1.269(4)
a
a
a
–N
a
collected, 4066 unique with [Rint = 0.0333], R1[I . 2s(I)] = 0.0475, final
(for all data) R1 = 0.0673, wR2 = 0.1353, GOF = 1.074. Data collections of
˚
crystals were performed with Mo Ka radiation (l = 0.71073 A) on a Bruker
Smart Apex CCD diffractometer at T = 293(2) K using SMART. See
Fig. S1–S3{ for XP drawings of the ligand and the complexes, respectively.
For crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format, see DOI:
b
a
b
C
b
LN
The enol form of 4-pcih in the metalloligand can be verified by
10.1039/b705603f
crystallographic and spectroscopic data. The corresponding C–N,
N–N and C–O bond distances in the CLN–N(H)–CLO moiety in
free 4-Hpcih and the two complexes show significant differences
1
(a) J. S. Seo, D. Whang, H. Lee, S. I. Jun, J. Oh, Y. J. Jeon and K. Kim,
Nature, 2000, 404, 982; (b) D. N. Dybtsev, H. Chun, S. H. Yoon,
D. Kim and K. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 32; (c) M. Ogawa
and K. Kuroda, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 399; (d) M.-H. Zeng,
W.-X. Zhang, X.-Z. Sun and X.-M. Chen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
(Table 1), which indicates that the CLN–N(H)–CLO moiety exists
2
in the free ligand and 1, whereas the conjugated CLN–NLC–O
9
moiety is present in 2. The negative charge, arising upon the loss
of the proton originally bound to the amido-N atom, is delocalized
to the carbonyl-O atom. The electron delocalization enhances the
coordination ability of the oxygen atom, hence the oxygen atom
2005, 44, 3079.
2
3
(a) M. Eddaoudi, D. B. Moler, H. Li, B. Chen, T. M. Reineke,
M. O’Keeffe and O. M. Yaghi, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 319; (b)
O. R. Evans and W. Lin, Acc. Chem. Res., 2002, 35, 511; (c)
L. Brammer, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2004, 33, 476.
(a) S. Kitagawa, R. Kitaura and S.-i. Noro, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2004, 43, 2334; (b) R. Vaidhyanathan, S. Natarajan and C. N. R. Rao,
2
+
binds to Cu in 2 but stays vacant in 1. The amide N–H (ca. 3448
21
2
1
and 3443 cm , respectively) and CLO (ca. 1688 and 1650 cm
respectively) stretching vibrations are found in the IR spectra of
,
Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 4496; (c) M. J. Zaworotko, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2000, 39, 3052; (d) L. Carlucci, G. Ciani and D. M. Proserpio,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 2003, 246, 247; (e) S. R. Batten and R. Robson,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 1460.
4 (a) D. Li, T. Wu, X.-P. Zhou, R. Zhou and X.-C. Huang, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 4175; (b) R. Peng, D. Li, T. Wu, X.-P. Zhou
and S. W. Ng, Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45, 4035; (c) S.-Z. Zhan, D. Li,
X.-P. Zhou and X.-H. Zhou, Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45, 9163; (d)
X.-P. Zhou, W.-X. Ni, S.-Z. Zhan, J. Ni, D. Li and Y.-G. Yin, Inorg.
Chem., 2007, 46, 2345; (e) S.-S. Zhang, S.-Z. Zhan, M. Li, R. Peng and
D. Li, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46, 4365.
the free ligand and 1, but are not observed in that of 2. An
21
absorption band at 1614 cm due to the enol resonance in the
2
conjugated CLN–NLC–O moiety, which is absent in the spectra
of the free ligand and 1, exists in the spectrum of 2.
9a,11
It is noted that the formation of the metalloligand in 2 was
accompanied by the oxidation of CuCN to Cu(II), likely due to the
dissolved atmospheric oxygen in the solution. Because the hard
2+
+
base oxygen donors tend to coordinate Cu rather than Cu , the
deprotonation of the ligand seems to facilitate the oxidation of
Cu(I) to form the metalloligand.
5
Y. Liang, R. Cao, W. Su, M. Hong and W. Zhang, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2000, 39, 3304.
6
(a) A.-L. Cheng, N. Liu, J.-Y. Zhang and E.-Q. Gao, Inorg. Chem.,
2007, 46, 1034; (b) Z. Matsumoto, T. Aridomi, A. Igashira-Kamiyama,
T. Kawamoto and T. Konno, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46, 2968; (c)
J. E. Beves, E. C. Constable, C. E. Housecroft, C. J. Kepert and
D. J. Price, CrystEngComm, 2007, 9, 456; (d) D. L. Murphy,
M. R. Malachowski, C. F. Campana and S. M. Cohen, Chem.
Commun., 2005, 5506.
In summary, we have developed a synthetic approach toward
higher dimensionality entangled frameworks by pH-induced
formation of the metalloligand. This work successfully demon-
strates that increasing the coordination sites of the ligand favors
assembling a more complicated and higher-dimensional structure.
The resulting 3D two-fold interpenetrating network constructed by
7
(a) S. R. Halper, L. Do, J. R. Stork and S. M. Cohen, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2006, 128, 15255; (b) R. Kitaura, G. Onoyama, H. Sakamoto,
R. Matsuda, S.-i. Noro and S. Kitagawa, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004,
2D self-penetrated sheets is unique.
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 20571050 and
4
3, 2684.
8 (a) R. Custelcean and M. G. Gorbunova, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
6362; (b) E. V. Anokhina, Y. B. Go, Y. Lee, T. Vogt and A. J.
1
20271031) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong
Jacobson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 9957; (c) K. Nakabayashi,
M. Kawano and M. Fujita, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 5322; (d)
J. W. Karr and V. A. Szalai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 3796.
(a) C. M. Armstrong, P. V. Bernhardt, P. Chin and D. R. Richardson,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2003, 1145; (b) P. V. Bernhardt, P. Chin and
D. R. Richardson, Dalton Trans., 2004, 3342; (c) P. Domiano,
A. Musatti, M. Nardelli, C. Pelizzi and G. Predieri, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans., 1979, 1266.
Province of China (No. 021240).
9
Notes and references
{
10 4
Crystal data for Ligand, CCDC 643873: C12H N O, monoclinic, space
˚ ˚
1
/n, M = 226.4, a = 7.7099(11) A, b = 14.665(2) A, c =
3
group P2
˚
˚
1
0.2423(15) A, b = 109.166(3)u, V = 1093.8(3) A , Z = 4, rcalcd
=
23
1.374 g cm , F(000) = 472, T = 293(2) K, 7486 reflections collected, 2684
10 (a) H.-L. Sun, S. Gao, B.-Q. Ma and S. R. Batten, CrystEngComm,
2004, 6, 579; (b) A. M. Chippindale, S. M. Cheyne and S. J. Hibble,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 7942; (c) X.-L. Wang, C. Qin,
E.-B. Wang, Z.-M. Su, L. Xua and S. R. Batten, Chem. Commun., 2005,
4789.
unique with (Rint = 0.0276), R1[I . 2s(I)] = 0.0512, final (for all data)
R1 = 0.0769, wR2 = 0.1419, GOF = 1.028; Complex 1, CCDC 646863:
C
28
H
20Cu
4 12 2 1
N O , monoclinic, space group P2 /n, M = 810.72,
˚
˚
˚
a = 9.4337(6) A, b = 32.490(2) A, c = 10.2061(7) A, a = c = 90u,
b = 105.3930(10)u, V = 3015.9(3) A , Z = 4, rcalcd = 1.785 g cm
3
23
,
˚
11 L. El-Sayed and M. F. Iskander, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1971, 33, 435.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
Chem. Commun., 2007, 3479–3481 | 3481