long-standing challenges associated with the use of organo-
metallic reagents in cross-coupling chemistry.6
reported for this type of transformation. The successful
realization of these reaction conditions should, in most cases,
replace the use of pentafluorophenyl organometallics in the
synthesis of these biaryl molecules.
Catalyst and reaction condition screens were performed
with 2-bromotoluene (1) and bromomesitylene (2) as the
model substrates in a reaction with pentafluorobenzene.
Under the conditions we previously described,12 very poor
conversion was obtained with 1 (Table 1, entry 1) and no
As noted, electron-deficient aryl (heteroaryl) organome-
tallic reagents constitute a challenging substrate class in
cross-coupling reactions and use of pentafluorophenyl or-
ganometallics is illustrative. Recent advances include the use
of C6F5B(OMe)3Li7 or C6F5BF3K8 salts, which enable
successful cross-coupling with aryl iodides. Very recently,
the use of C6F5B(OH)2 in conjunction with a stoichiometric
silver additive was discovered to enable reactions with both
aryl iodides and bromides.9 To our knowledge, there are no
reports of high-yielding cross-couplings with aryl chlorides
or with more sterically encumbered aryl halides. Given the
importance of perfluoroarenes in medicinal10 and particularly
materials chemistry,11 a general solution to this limitation
would be valuable in the synthesis of these molecules.
We recently reported the use of perfluorobenzenes as
replacements for the corresponding organometallic reagents
in cross-coupling reactions.12 These reactions were found to
occur in high yield with several aryl bromides but suffered
from low yields with aryl chlorides or with ortho-substituted
aryl bromides. These limitations prompted a reevaluation of
the catalyst and reaction conditions, focusing on these more
challenging substrates.
Table 1. Establishment of Conditions for Sterically
Encumbered Aryl Bromidesa
Herein, we report the discovery of new conditions for
reaction with a wide range of sterically encumbered bromides
and chlorides as well as aryl iodides, triflates, and hetero-
cyclic aryl halides. Strikingly, these new reactions also occur
at 80 °C, which is milder than our initially disclosed
conditions at 120 °C, and are among the mildest conditions
a Method A: Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), PtBu2MeHBF4 (10 mol %), K2CO3,
DMA, 120 °C. Method B: Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), S-Phos (10 mol %), K2CO3,
iPrOAc, 80 °C. b Determined by GCMS analysis. c Isolated Yield.
reaction was observed with 2 (entry 3). After extensive
optimization, a catalyst generated by mixing Pd(OAc)2 with
2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,6′-dimethoxybiphenyl (S-Phos)13
in isopropyl acetate at 80 °C with K2CO3 as the base emerged
as an excellent catalyst-solvent system. Under these condi-
tions, complete conversion was achieved with both aryl
bromides 1 and 2, resulting in 99% and 98% isolated yields,
respectively. The combination of the Pd(OAc)2/S-Phos
catalyst and the iPrOAc14 solvent appears to be an excellent
combination for these reactions. Notably, use of our previ-
(4) For recent examples involving metallacyclic intermediates, see: (a)
Daugulis, O.; Zaitsev, V. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4046. (b)
Kalyani, D.; Deprez, N. R.; Desai, L. V.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 7330. (c) Kakiuchi, F.; Kan, S.; Igi, K.; Chatani, N.; Murai,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1698. (d) Bedford, R. B.; Coles, S. J.;
Hursthouse, M. B.; Limmert, M. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 112.
(5) For recent examples of intramolecular reactions with simple arenes,
see: (a) Campeau, L.-C.; Parisien, M.; Leblanc, M.; Fagnou, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9186. (b) Campeau, L.-C.; Parisien, M.; Jean, A.;
Fagnou, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 581. (c) Huang, Q.; Fazio, A.;
Dai, G.; Campo, M. A.; Larock, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7460.
(d) Garcia-Cuadrado, D.; Braga, A. A. C.; Maseras, F.; Echavarren, A. M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1066.
i
ously reported Pd(OAc)2/PtBu2MeHBF4 catalyst in PrOAc
or use of Pd(OAc)2/S-Phos in DMA leads to significantly
diminished outcomes. We also note that the reaction tem-
perature can be lowered to 70 °C, but occasionally incom-
plete conversion is obtained; thus, we chose 80 °C as the
standard reaction temperature for subsequent studies.
The scope of the reaction with pentafluorobenzene and a
range of aryl halides were investigated and are outlined in
Table 2. In addition to ortho-substituted aryl bromides (entry
2), aryl iodides may also be employed (entry 3). With aryl
iodides, 0.5 equiv of Ag2CO3 must be employed as an
additive. An inhibitory effect of iodide salts on direct
arylation has previously been observed,5b,15 and we postulate
(6) Campeau, L. C.; Rousseaux, S.; Fagnou, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 18020.
(7) Frohn, H.-J.; Adonin, N. Y.; Bardin, V. V.; Starichenko, V. F. J.
Fluorine Chem. 2003, 122, 195.
(8) (a) Frohn, H.-J.; Adonin, N. Y.; Bardin, V. V.; Starichenko, V. F.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8111. (b) Molander, G. A.; Biolatto, B. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 4302.
(9) Korenga, T.; Kosaki, T.; Fukumura, R.; Ema, T.; Sakai, T. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 4915.
(10) (a) Zahn, A.; Brotschi, C.; Leumann, C. J. Chem. Eur. 2005, 11,
2125. (b) Russell, M. G. N.; Carling, R. W.; Atack, J. R.; Bromidge, F. A.;
Cook, S. M.; Hunt, P.; Isted, C.; Lucas, M.; McKernan, R. M.; Mitchinson,
A.; Moore, K. W.; Narquizian, R.; Macaulay, A. J.; Thomas, D.; Thompson,
S.-A.; Wafford, K. A.; Castro, J. L. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 1367.
(11) (a) Sakamoto, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Miura, A.; Fujikawa, H.; Tokito, S.;
Taga, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1832. (b) Hwang, D. H.; Song, S.
Y.; Ahn, T.; Chu, H. Y.; Do, L. M.; Kim, S. H.; Shim, H. K.; Zyung, T.
Synth. Met. 2000, 111, 485. (c) Montes, V. A.; Li, G.; Pohl, R.; Shinar, J.;
Anzenbacher, P. AdV. Mater. 2004, 16, 2001. (d) Tsuzuki, T.; Shirasawa,
N.; Suzuki, T.; Tokito, S. AdV. Mater. 2003, 15, 1455. (e) Kitamura, T.;
Wada, Y.; Yanagida, S. J. Fluorine Chem. 2000, 105, 305. (f) Weck, M.;
Dunn, A. R.; Matsumoto, K.; Coates, G. W.; Lobkovsky, E. B.; Grubbs,
R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2741. (g) Nitschke, J. R.; Tilley, T.
D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10183.
(13) Walker, S. D.; Barder, T. E.; Martinelli, J. R.; Buchwald, S. L.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1871.
(14) EtOAc can also be employed. However, the lower volatility and
i
slightly higher boiling point of PrOAc results in greater reproducibility
and greater ease in performing the reactions. Notably, it allows the reactions
to be run below the solvent boiling point (85-91 °C).
(15) Pivsa-Art, S.; Satoh, T.; Kawamura, Y.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1998, 71, 467.
(12) Lafrance, M.; Rowley, C. N.; Woo, T. K.; Fagnou, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 8754.
5098
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 22, 2006